2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics
2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics
2008 Barcelona - European Society of Human Genetics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Cytogenetics<br />
Rennes, France, 4 Département de Génétique, INSERM U676, Hôpital Robert<br />
Debré, AP-HP, Paris, France, 5 Département d’Histologie Embryologie Cytogénétique,<br />
Hôpital Jean Verdier, Bondy, AP-HP, UFR-USMBH, Paris XIII, Paris,<br />
France, 6 Service de Génétique Médicale, Rennes, France.<br />
Background: Genome-wide screening <strong>of</strong> patients with mental retardation<br />
using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (array-CGH) has<br />
identified several novel imbalances. With this genotype-first approach,<br />
the 2q22 .3q23 .3 deletion was recently described as a novel microdeletion<br />
syndrome . We report two unrelated patients with a de novo<br />
interstitial deletion mapping in this genomic region and presenting<br />
similar “pseudo-Angelman” phenotypes, including severe psychomotor<br />
retardation, speech impairment, epilepsy, microcephaly, ataxia and<br />
behavioural disabilities .<br />
Methods: The microdeletions were identified by array-CGH using oligonucleotide<br />
and BAC-arrays, and further confirmed by Fluorescence<br />
In Situ Hybridization (FISH) and semi-quantitative PCR .<br />
Results: The boundaries and sizes <strong>of</strong> the deletions in the two patients<br />
were different but an overlapping region <strong>of</strong> about 250 kb was defined,<br />
which mapped to 2q23 .1 and included two genes: MBD5 and EPC2 .<br />
The SIP1 gene associated with the Mowat Wilson syndrome was not<br />
included in the deleted genomic region .<br />
Discussion: Haploinsufficiency <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the deleted genes (MBD5 or<br />
EPC2) could be responsible for the common clinical features observed<br />
in the 2q23 .1 microdeletion syndrome and this hypothesis needs further<br />
investigation .<br />
P02.165<br />
Etiological investigation <strong>of</strong> the midline Facial Defects with<br />
Hipertelorism by molecular and cytogenetic techniques<br />
E. L. Freitas1 , S. M. Gribble2 , M. Simioni1 , E. Prigmore2 , N. P. Carter2 , V. L.<br />
Gil-da-Silva-Lopes1 ;<br />
1 2 Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil, The Wellcome Trust<br />
Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.<br />
The Midline Facial Defects with Hipertelorism (MFDH) are a heterogeneous<br />
and rare group <strong>of</strong> crani<strong>of</strong>acial disorders mainly characterized<br />
by ocular hypertelorism and bifid nose. The pathogenesis <strong>of</strong> these<br />
conditions is still unknown . All 14 individuals in this study were previously<br />
investigated by clinical, dysmorphologic and neurological evaluation,<br />
skull and facial X-rays, computerized tomography and MRI <strong>of</strong><br />
the brain, and ophthalmologic and otorhynolaringologic evaluation and<br />
GTG banding . The evaluations demonstrate facial alterations, structural<br />
and functional anomalies <strong>of</strong> the central nervous system, indicating,<br />
mainly, cortical migrations errors, perfusion variances and cerebella<br />
involvement . Based upon these observations, we determined an initial<br />
molecular investigation strategy . The phenotypes and a review <strong>of</strong> the<br />
literature suggested genes related to face and CNS development such<br />
as SHH, PAX3 and FGF8 may be involved in these disorders . These<br />
genes have been reported to participate in embryological development<br />
and are associated with some syndromes with crani<strong>of</strong>acial anomalies .<br />
The SHH, PAX3 and FGF8 genes were screened by direct sequencing<br />
and however mutations were found . To complement these studies, the<br />
whole genome tiling path array-CGH technique was performed and<br />
one deletion was found that affected PAX3 in a familial case .Other<br />
copy number changes were detected and these findings are currently<br />
being confirmed by FISH and PCR . These preliminary results suggest<br />
our initial hypothesis that developmental genes, such as PAX3, play a<br />
role in the MFDH etiology .<br />
P02.166<br />
Diagnosis <strong>of</strong> Miller-Dieker syndrome (MDS) by fluorescence in<br />
situ hybridization (FisH)<br />
M. Bassecourt, M. Alcaine, S. Izquierdo, E. Garcia, M. Calvo;<br />
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.<br />
Introduction: Mieller Dieker Syndrome (MDS) involves a deletion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
chromosomic band 17p13 .3 which contains the gene called LIS 1 (lissencephaly-1)<br />
. It is a syndrome with a very low frecuency, estimated<br />
in 11,7 cases for each million <strong>of</strong> births, although the incidence and the<br />
prevalence are probably higher .<br />
Objective: The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to report a case from “breast-fed<br />
baby” with a extensive record: premature baby, dismorfic phenotype,<br />
lissencephaly, agenesis <strong>of</strong> the corpus callosum and septum pellucidum.<br />
Molecular techniques are used to confirm the submicroscopic<br />
deletion on 17p13 .3 .<br />
Methods: It was realized a double culture <strong>of</strong> lymphocytes with conventional<br />
banding GTG high resolution, followed by a FISH with the probe<br />
LSI 1 (maps to the 17p13 .3 region on chromosome 17 containing the<br />
gene localization <strong>of</strong> the MDS) .<br />
Results: The fetu´s karyotype is: Male: 46, XY, del (17) (p13 .3) . After<br />
hybridization with the probe, the SpectrumOrange LSI 1 signal was<br />
present in only one chromosome 17 and the SprectrumGreen LSI<br />
RARA 17q21 .1 signal (control) was present in both chromosomes 17 .<br />
Male: 46, XY . ish del (17)(p13 .3 p13 .3)(LIS1-) .<br />
The parents´ karyotypes are in progress .<br />
Conclusions: Our results postulate that approximately 90 percent <strong>of</strong><br />
the patients with MDS phenotype show deletion <strong>of</strong> the band 17p13 .3<br />
but only in a 50 percent <strong>of</strong> these cases the deletion is visible by<br />
high resolution cytogenetic techniques. The own specificity <strong>of</strong> FISH<br />
achieves cytogenetic diagnosis that rarely it is obtained with banding<br />
techniques, unless prometaphasic chromosomes with high number <strong>of</strong><br />
bands would be used .<br />
P02.167<br />
the results <strong>of</strong> missed abortus testing from istanbul memorial<br />
Hospital<br />
O. Oner, G. Ozgon, C. Aslan, B. Onal, F. Fiorentino;<br />
Genoma Turkey, istanbul, Turkey.<br />
INTRODUCTION: The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is the retrospective data collection<br />
for patients underwent IVF treatment and spontaneous pregnancy<br />
lost between 2000-2007 for missed abortus with indications<br />
such as; advanced maternal age (ama), recurrent implantation failure<br />
(rif), recurrent pregnancy lost (rpl) and male factor .<br />
MAT- METHOD: Tissue cultures were performed for missed abortus<br />
materials . Culture developments were observed and underwent harvesting<br />
steps in the optimum timing . Slides were stained with giemsa<br />
staining techniques (GTG) and 30 cells were counted .<br />
Between years 2000-2007, tissue cultures were performed to 308<br />
patients in our center . 149 <strong>of</strong> them were IVF patients, and 159 were<br />
spontaneous missed abort .<br />
38/149 IVF and 48/159 spontaneous missed abort cases had abnormal<br />
karyotypes . We also analiysed Trisomy 9, Trisomy 8, Trisomy 4<br />
and Mosaic X in 4 PGD cases .The indications and chromosome analysis<br />
results <strong>of</strong> 38/149 IVF cases are represented in the table .1 below .<br />
Table 1<br />
Indications Results<br />
RPL<br />
(n=3)<br />
AMA<br />
(n=4)<br />
RIF<br />
(n=22)<br />
Male<br />
Factor(n=9)<br />
Trisomy 8 (n=1)<br />
Triploidy (n=1)<br />
Trisomy X/ Trisomy 20 (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 13 (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 16 (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 18 (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 13/16 (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 3 (n=1) Trisomy 13/16 (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 12 (n=2) Trisomy 16/20 (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 13 (n=1) 45,X (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 15 (n=1) 47,XXY (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 16 (n=4) Tetraploidy (n=3)<br />
Trisomy 18 (n=1) del(1)(q32 .1q42 .1) (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 19 (n=1) der(14;14),+14 (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 20 (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 22 (n=1)<br />
45,X (n=4) Trisomy 16 (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 4 (n=1) inv(10q) (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 7 (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 9 (n=1)<br />
Spontaneous missed abortus results<br />
(n=48)<br />
Trisomy 3 (n=1) Trisomy 21 (n=3)<br />
Trisomy 6 (n=2) Trisomy 22 (n=6)<br />
Trisomy 7 (n=1) Triploidy (n=5)<br />
Trisomy 8 (n=3) Tetraploidy (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 16 (n=5) 45,X (n=11)<br />
Trisomy 15 (n=5) Mosaic X (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 17 (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 18 (n=1)<br />
Trisomy 20 (n=2)