here - ERIM - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
here - ERIM - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam here - ERIM - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
A validation Study of House of Quality key performance indicators 4.3.4 The House of Quality The different parts of the House of quality are discussed in section 2.5. To recap; the construction of the House of Quality consists of 1) the customer needs (left), 2) the planning matrix , 3) technical requirements or HOW’S, 4) relation matrix (centre) 5) technical correlation matrix (the roof) and 6) technical matrix. The House of Quality as constructed for the online union is presented below (Figure - 13). Although processed in the completion of House of Quality as depicted below, the technical correlation matrix is not displayed in Figure - 13 but will be presented separately. The different elements of the House of Quality will be discussed underneath. Figure - 13 The House of Quality for the online union Customer Requirements The customer requirements or “Whats” are qualified by the interviews with employees of the online union and members of the online union in phase I of this research study. After this the needs were defined into five dimensions and quantified by the online survey of phase II. Factor analysis in phase III classified the needs into four dimensions; interaction, safety, tangibles and information. 66
A validation Study of House of Quality key performance indicators Technical Requirements The technical requirements or “Hows” are established from investigations of the service process of the online union during the past half year of this research study. Furthermore requirements were performed in strong collaboration with the management team of the online union. A clarification of the technical requirements will be discussed below. 1- Contact availability; available options for members to get in contact with online union. 2- Employee availability; number of union experts available for direct services. 3- Knowledge; knowledge available in the organization of the online union (experts, databases, third parties) 4- Frequency of contact; interaction moments with members (newsletter, requests, site visits, etc). 5- Speed of services; process time of the services. 6- Frequency of information updates; number of information updates on website, newsletters. 7- Member feedback processing; how feedback is effectively processed through the organization. 8- Database options; database options with all relevant information of the members. 9- Personalization of services; extent of personalized services for a specific member. 10- Automatization; extent to which service processes are automated. 11- Digitalization; extent to which services and facilities are digitalized. 12- Networking availability; extent of options to create networks between members, the online union and third parties. Planning matrix/ Competitive assessment The results of the benchmark study in chapter 5 were not sufficient enough to be processed into the House of Quality (Figure - 13). This insufficiency of the information can be explained by two factors. First of all, the online union of De Unie is the only virtual union in Holland whereas competitors in this case are the traditional unions. Therefore to compare the activities of the online union we studied other e-services in chapter five. Secondly, as mentioned in the introduction and in section 2.2 the decline in the member population creates a climate where every competitor is searching for new ways to recruit members. The management team of the online union does not have enough knowledge of the competitive projects related to the online union to process into the House of Quality. De Unie has planned to start with a competitive benchmark in the first months of 2008. 67
- Page 15 and 16: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 17 and 18: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 19 and 20: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 21 and 22: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 23 and 24: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 25 and 26: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 27 and 28: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 29 and 30: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 31 and 32: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 33 and 34: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 35 and 36: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 37 and 38: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 39 and 40: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 41 and 42: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 43 and 44: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 45 and 46: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 47 and 48: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 49 and 50: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 51 and 52: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 53 and 54: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 55 and 56: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 57 and 58: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 59 and 60: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 61 and 62: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 63 and 64: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 65: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 69 and 70: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 71 and 72: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 73 and 74: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 75 and 76: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 77 and 78: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 79 and 80: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 81 and 82: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 83 and 84: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 85 and 86: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 87 and 88: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 89 and 90: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 91 and 92: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 93 and 94: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 95 and 96: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 97 and 98: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 99 and 100: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 101 and 102: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 103 and 104: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 105 and 106: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 107 and 108: A validation Study of House of Qual
A validation Study of House of Quality key performance indicators<br />
Technical Requirements<br />
The technical requirements or “Hows” are established from investigations of the service process of<br />
the online union during the past half year of this research study. Furthermore requirements were<br />
performed in strong collaboration with the management team of the online union. A clarification of<br />
the technical requirements will be discussed below.<br />
1- Contact availability; available options for members to get in contact with online union.<br />
2- Employee availability; number of union experts available for direct services.<br />
3- Knowledge; knowledge available in the organization of the online union (experts, databases,<br />
third parties)<br />
4- Frequency of contact; interaction moments with members (newsletter, requests, site visits,<br />
etc).<br />
5- Speed of services; process time of the services.<br />
6- Frequency of information updates; number of information updates on website, newsletters.<br />
7- Member feedback processing; how feedback is effectively processed through the<br />
organization.<br />
8- Database options; database options with all relevant information of the members.<br />
9- Personalization of services; extent of personalized services for a specific member.<br />
10- Automatization; extent to which service processes are automated.<br />
11- Digitalization; extent to which services and facilities are digitalized.<br />
12- Networking availability; extent of options to create networks between members, the online<br />
union and third parties.<br />
Planning matrix/ Competitive assessment<br />
The results of the benchmark study in chapter 5 were not sufficient enough to be processed into the<br />
House of Quality (Figure - 13). This insufficiency of the information can be explained by two factors.<br />
First of all, the online union of De Unie is the only virtual union in Holland w<strong>here</strong>as competitors in<br />
this case are the traditional unions. T<strong>here</strong>fore to compare the activities of the online union we<br />
studied other e-services in chapter five. Secondly, as mentioned in the introduction and in section 2.2<br />
the decline in the member population creates a climate w<strong>here</strong> every competitor is searching for new<br />
ways to recruit members. The management team of the online union does not have enough<br />
knowledge of the competitive projects related to the online union to process into the House of<br />
Quality. De Unie has planned to start with a competitive benchmark in the first months of 2008.<br />
67