here - ERIM - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
here - ERIM - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam here - ERIM - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
A validation Study of House of Quality key performance indicators The scree plot and eigenvalues provided by SPSS, indicate a composition of four factors. After deciding the number of factors, the communality values were inspected. A communality (hi2) = % of variance in xi explained by the factor model. When a communality value of a variable is relative low (.414. The Varimax rotation procedure was used to select variables into factors. The varimax rotation procedure is an orthogonal method of rotation (axes are maintained at right angles) that minimizes the number of variables with high loading factors on a factor thereby enhancing the interpretability of the factor (Malhotra & Birks, 2004). Component 1 2 3 4 Up-to-date information ,807 Reliability of information ,796 Offering relevant information ,728 Member involvement on development ,481 Interaction between Union and members ,425 ,500 Interaction between members ,674 Involvement third parties ,604 Recognizing needs of the members ,461 Perception of solidarity ,499 Opportunity of physical meetings ,721 Opportunity of virtual meetings ,779 Members in the same position ,639 Good representation of interests ,641 Perception of safety and protection ,509 ,656 Influence of online union ,756 Intelligibility objectives and services ,507 Offering effective support ,646 Reliability and quality of services ,556 Professional presentation ,511 ,632 Good online facilities ,777 Accessibility of information ,608 Custom-made services ,658 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. a Rotation converged in 6 iterations. Table 6 - Rotated component matrix Factor analysis, as presented in Table 6 indicates four factors which collectively explained 58,7% of the variance in all items. Based on the exploratory investigations of phase I, the original model ( 58
A validation Study of House of Quality key performance indicators Table 2) consisted five dimensions (factors). The explored dimension “Solidarity” was not recognized as a single dimension. Factor analysis merged the dimensions “Interaction” and “Solidarity” and indicated it as one dimension, that we (still) name “Interaction”. Furthermore the item “recognizing the needs of the members” switched from the dimension “Interaction” to “Information”, whereas the item “reliability and quality of services” was replaced from the dimension “Tangibles” to “Safety”. Due to the high factor loadings and plausible interpretations, we decided to adopt the new structure. The new dimensional structure is presented in Table 7. Scale Reliablity Table 7 - Dimensional structure after Factor Analysis After the factor analysis, item analysis was conducted to test if the dimensions composed by the factor analysis are reliable. Cronbach’s alphas were employed to test the reliability of the dimensions. Item anlysis is conducted after the factor anlysis because Cronbach’s alphas measures how well a set of items measures a unidimensial construct; the scale has no underlying factors. Cronbach’s alphas value varies betwen 0 and 1, where values 0.7 are acceptable. As presented in Table 8, for all dimensions Cronbach’s alphas are >0.7 which implicates that the scales are reliable. 59
- Page 7 and 8: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 9 and 10: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 11 and 12: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 13 and 14: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 15 and 16: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 17 and 18: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 19 and 20: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 21 and 22: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 23 and 24: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 25 and 26: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 27 and 28: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 29 and 30: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 31 and 32: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 33 and 34: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 35 and 36: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 37 and 38: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 39 and 40: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 41 and 42: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 43 and 44: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 45 and 46: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 47 and 48: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 49 and 50: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 51 and 52: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 53 and 54: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 55 and 56: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 57: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 61 and 62: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 63 and 64: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 65 and 66: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 67 and 68: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 69 and 70: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 71 and 72: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 73 and 74: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 75 and 76: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 77 and 78: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 79 and 80: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 81 and 82: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 83 and 84: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 85 and 86: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 87 and 88: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 89 and 90: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 91 and 92: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 93 and 94: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 95 and 96: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 97 and 98: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 99 and 100: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 101 and 102: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 103 and 104: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 105 and 106: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 107 and 108: A validation Study of House of Qual
A validation Study of House of Quality key performance indicators<br />
The scree plot and eigenvalues provided by SPSS, indicate a composition of four factors. After<br />
deciding the number of factors, the communality values were inspected. A communality (hi2) = % of<br />
variance in xi explained by the factor model. When a communality value of a variable is relative low<br />
(.414.<br />
The Varimax rotation procedure was used to select variables into factors. The varimax rotation<br />
procedure is an orthogonal method of rotation (axes are maintained at right angles) that minimizes<br />
the number of variables with high loading factors on a factor t<strong>here</strong>by enhancing the interpretability<br />
of the factor (Malhotra & Birks, 2004).<br />
Component<br />
1 2 3 4<br />
Up-to-date information ,807<br />
Reliability of information ,796<br />
Offering relevant information ,728<br />
Member involvement on development ,481<br />
Interaction between Union and members ,425 ,500<br />
Interaction between members ,674<br />
Involvement third parties ,604<br />
Recognizing needs of the members ,461<br />
Perception of solidarity ,499<br />
Opportunity of physical meetings ,721<br />
Opportunity of virtual meetings ,779<br />
Members in the same position ,639<br />
Good representation of interests ,641<br />
Perception of safety and protection ,509 ,656<br />
Influence of online union ,756<br />
Intelligibility objectives and services ,507<br />
Offering effective support ,646<br />
Reliability and quality of services ,556<br />
Professional presentation ,511 ,632<br />
Good online facilities ,777<br />
Accessibility of information ,608<br />
Custom-made services ,658<br />
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.<br />
Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.<br />
a Rotation converged in 6 iterations.<br />
Table 6 - Rotated component matrix<br />
Factor analysis, as presented in Table 6 indicates four factors which collectively explained 58,7% of<br />
the variance in all items. Based on the exploratory investigations of phase I, the original model (<br />
58