here - ERIM - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
here - ERIM - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam here - ERIM - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
A validation Study of House of Quality key performance indicators Phase I: Exploratory research; defining member’s needs Several sources will be used in order to indentify the specific needs of the members that can be considered as key performance drivers for the online union. One source is the literature research discussed in chapter two. Exploratory research to define the needs will be done by two types of planned in-depth interviews. Interviews with Union experts: The knowledge embedded by experts can be valuable for the classification of the service aspects desired by the members. Union experts in this case are employees of De Unie that are in a professional way related to the online union. The knowledge of experts about the firm and the industry can help in diagnosing the nature of the research problem (Malhotra and Birks 2003). Three structured interviews will be conducted with members of the management team of the online union. The results of the interviews are used as input for the in- depth interviews with members of the online union. Interviews with members: Based on the results of the in-depth interviews with union experts, semi- structured in-depth interviews will be held with individual members of the online union. Purpose of the interviews is to get a deeper understanding of factors that determine member’s perception of the online union. Important to notice in this case is that all interviewed members are also employee of De Unie. From this perspective they have a certain double role. While the online union is an organization that operates on the internet, its members are geographically dispersed over the Netherlands. For practical reasons I decided to interview employees who are also members of the online union and therefore located on one of the offices of De Unie. The interviewed members are selected from different departments in order to get a deeper understanding of the needs from different perspectives. The interviews with the union experts and the members of the online union will result in a list of items that are assumed to be related to the overall performance of the online union. Propositions will be formulated to test the assumed relationships. The explored items will be validated by surveying a statistically reliable sample of members of the online union. Results of the exploratory research are present in chapter 4. Phase II Quantitative research; online survey After exploratory research conducted in phase I, an online survey will be used to quantify the explored items and to test the formulated propositions by advanced statistical techniques. Based on the SERVQUAL concept, the online survey will collect data of member’s perceptions and expectations 44
A validation Study of House of Quality key performance indicators of the explored items in phase I. Besides perceptions and expectations, the survey will measure the priorities of the explored items based on the Kano model. Data gathered by the SERVQUAL model and Kano model will be processed into the House of Quality. The content and methodology of the online survey will be discussed in section 3.3. The statistical analysis of the data gathered with the online survey will be presented in chapter 5. Phase III Establishing the House of Quality The data collected from the survey of phase II will be processed into the House of Quality. As mentioned in section 2.5 this technique is used to translate the needs of the members of the online union into appropriate technical requirements. The House of Quality will provide information for De Unie about performance drivers of the online union that are expected and desired by its members. Therefore the results in terms of requirements and prioritized expectations can be used as input for improvement, innovation and strategic direction (Gonzales 2006) of the online union. On the other hand, the House of Quality will be used to provide answers for the research questions and to validate the conceptual model. The construction and analysis of the House of Quality will be presented in chapter 5. 3.3 Instrument development and quality A survey can be defined as a “pre-formulated set of questions to which respondents record their answers, usually within rather closely defined alternatives” (Sekaran 2003, p.236). An online survey will be conducted to quantify the items investigated by exploratory research. Hence, it will provide data for statistical analysis and integration into the House of Quality. Construction of the survey instrument is based on the SERVQUAL model by Parasuraman et al (1988), that measures the service quality. Its original service dimensions determined by Parasuraman et al (1985) have a universal nature and are in a certain way applicable for many service organizations to measure the gap between the delivered quality of services and the expected quality of services. By exploratory research we will look if the SERVQUAL attributes are appropriate for this specific research. Moreover we are interested to look for new items in relation to the service quality of the online union. After exploratory research, the investigated items will be grouped into dimensions. Each dimension consists of several items. Items will be measured on a five-point Likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Each item is measured by two questions. The first question measures the overall expectation, whereas the second questions measures the respondent’s perception about the item in relation to the online union. 45
- Page 1 and 2: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 3 and 4: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 5 and 6: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 7 and 8: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 9 and 10: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 11 and 12: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 13 and 14: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 15 and 16: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 17 and 18: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 19 and 20: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 21 and 22: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 23 and 24: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 25 and 26: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 27 and 28: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 29 and 30: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 31 and 32: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 33 and 34: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 35 and 36: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 37 and 38: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 39 and 40: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 41 and 42: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 43: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 47 and 48: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 49 and 50: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 51 and 52: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 53 and 54: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 55 and 56: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 57 and 58: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 59 and 60: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 61 and 62: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 63 and 64: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 65 and 66: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 67 and 68: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 69 and 70: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 71 and 72: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 73 and 74: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 75 and 76: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 77 and 78: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 79 and 80: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 81 and 82: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 83 and 84: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 85 and 86: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 87 and 88: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 89 and 90: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 91 and 92: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 93 and 94: A validation Study of House of Qual
A validation Study of House of Quality key performance indicators<br />
of the explored items in phase I. Besides perceptions and expectations, the survey will measure the<br />
priorities of the explored items based on the Kano model. Data gat<strong>here</strong>d by the SERVQUAL model<br />
and Kano model will be processed into the House of Quality.<br />
The content and methodology of the online survey will be discussed in section 3.3. The statistical<br />
analysis of the data gat<strong>here</strong>d with the online survey will be presented in chapter 5.<br />
Phase III Establishing the House of Quality<br />
The data collected from the survey of phase II will be processed into the House of Quality. As<br />
mentioned in section 2.5 this technique is used to translate the needs of the members of the online<br />
union into appropriate technical requirements. The House of Quality will provide information for De<br />
Unie about performance drivers of the online union that are expected and desired by its members.<br />
T<strong>here</strong>fore the results in terms of requirements and prioritized expectations can be used as input for<br />
improvement, innovation and strategic direction (Gonzales 2006) of the online union. On the other<br />
hand, the House of Quality will be used to provide answers for the research questions and to validate<br />
the conceptual model. The construction and analysis of the House of Quality will be presented in<br />
chapter 5.<br />
3.3 Instrument development and quality<br />
A survey can be defined as a “pre-formulated set of questions to which respondents record their<br />
answers, usually within rather closely defined alternatives” (Sekaran 2003, p.236). An online survey<br />
will be conducted to quantify the items investigated by exploratory research. Hence, it will provide<br />
data for statistical analysis and integration into the House of Quality.<br />
Construction of the survey instrument is based on the SERVQUAL model by Parasuraman et al (1988),<br />
that measures the service quality. Its original service dimensions determined by Parasuraman et al<br />
(1985) have a universal nature and are in a certain way applicable for many service organizations to<br />
measure the gap between the delivered quality of services and the expected quality of services. By<br />
exploratory research we will look if the SERVQUAL attributes are appropriate for this specific<br />
research. Moreover we are interested to look for new items in relation to the service quality of the<br />
online union. After exploratory research, the investigated items will be grouped into dimensions.<br />
Each dimension consists of several items. Items will be measured on a five-point Likert scale from<br />
strongly disagree to strongly agree. Each item is measured by two questions. The first question<br />
measures the overall expectation, w<strong>here</strong>as the second questions measures the respondent’s<br />
perception about the item in relation to the online union.<br />
45