here - ERIM - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
here - ERIM - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam here - ERIM - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
A validation Study of House of Quality key performance indicators Technical Correlation Matrix The roof of the House of Quality, shows which HOW’S are interrelated and how strong these relationships are. The technical correlation matrix shows for which areas close communication and collaboration is important and for which areas it is less or not important and between which attributes design bottlenecks may occur (Cohen 1995). Like for the relationship matrix, also for the correlation matrix symbols are used to indicate mutual improvement (+) or trade off (-) relationships between the HOW’S. Technical Matrix The last part of the House of Quality is the Technical Matrix. This part provides a lot of technical information that is linked to both customer needs and parts characteristics in the second phase of QFD (Chan, 2002). First the relative importance ratings of each HOW to all the WHAT’S needs to be determined by multiplying the final importance ratings and the weightings from the plannin matrix. Next step is to set the targets for the HOW’S, also called the HOW MUCH’es (American Supplier Institute 1994). These targets represents levels of performance for the HOW’S in a way that the organization believes that is required in oder to be competitive in comparison to competitive products or services. In order to be specific and measurable each target should be quantified. It is also important that the targets that are set, are reachable according to the technical sources of the The HOW’S with the highest final rates are moved to Phase II of Quality Function Deployment, the parts deployment. 2.6 Conceptual model Previous sections discussed the literature relevant for the present research study. Based on the literature findings we developed the conceptual model as depicted in Figure - 7. As discussed in the literature review, new types of interaction are becoming more significant. For the present research we focus on virtual communities, which nowadays form the basis of the internet. More specifically, the concept of the online union can be classified as an online community. The present research seeks to provide new insights on how to create value by matching the needs of the members of the online union on the demand side and the design of the online union on the supply side. Therefore, exploratory research followed by a validation study, through a statistically reliable sample of members of the online union, is applied to identify key performance drivers of the online union. 40
A validation Study of House of Quality key performance indicators Figure - 7 Conceptual Model (Based on Go, 2005) The conceptual model is based on the matchmaker model of demand, mediation and supply and draws on to the idea of Prahalad and Ramaswamy (2004). As described in section 2.2, Prahalad and Ramaswamy (2004, p.5) claim that: “The processes of value creation are shifting from a product view to personalized experiences.” As the value creation is shifting, the market is becoming a forum for interactions between consumers, communities and organizations. Specifically, interactive media is able to strengthen these relationships between consumers and organizations, but is can also strengthen the relationship between consumers (Lievrouw & Livingstone 2006). These relationships can be defined as pseudo relationships (Gutek, 1996). Thus the interaction will result in changing relationships and influences between the different participants. First, the interactivity aspect of the online community makes it possible to share experiences and information and therefore can be a source of knowledge between members. In general within online communities different members can be identified. These different identities have their own specific knowledge, needs, and expectations. As a result, interactivity can create value in a way of mutual benefits. Second, interaction strengthens the relation between the organization and the third parties involved. The identity of the organization fits with the identity of the members of the online community. In other words the organization needs to examine its stakeholders and the expectations of their stakeholders (i.e. members and third parties) to create a matching organizational identity. To sum up, due to interactivity the components linked to internal and external information will provide members of the online union information and knowledge; internal direct from all sorts of members 41
- Page 1 and 2: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 3 and 4: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 5 and 6: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 7 and 8: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 9 and 10: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 11 and 12: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 13 and 14: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 15 and 16: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 17 and 18: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 19 and 20: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 21 and 22: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 23 and 24: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 25 and 26: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 27 and 28: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 29 and 30: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 31 and 32: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 33 and 34: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 35 and 36: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 37 and 38: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 39: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 43 and 44: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 45 and 46: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 47 and 48: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 49 and 50: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 51 and 52: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 53 and 54: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 55 and 56: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 57 and 58: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 59 and 60: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 61 and 62: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 63 and 64: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 65 and 66: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 67 and 68: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 69 and 70: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 71 and 72: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 73 and 74: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 75 and 76: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 77 and 78: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 79 and 80: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 81 and 82: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 83 and 84: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 85 and 86: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 87 and 88: A validation Study of House of Qual
- Page 89 and 90: A validation Study of House of Qual
A validation Study of House of Quality key performance indicators<br />
Technical Correlation Matrix<br />
The roof of the House of Quality, shows which HOW’S are interrelated and how strong these<br />
relationships are. The technical correlation matrix shows for which areas close communication and<br />
collaboration is important and for which areas it is less or not important and between which<br />
attributes design bottlenecks may occur (Cohen 1995). Like for the relationship matrix, also for the<br />
correlation matrix symbols are used to indicate mutual improvement (+) or trade off (-) relationships<br />
between the HOW’S.<br />
Technical Matrix<br />
The last part of the House of Quality is the Technical Matrix. This part provides a lot of technical<br />
information that is linked to both customer needs and parts characteristics in the second phase of<br />
QFD (Chan, 2002). First the relative importance ratings of each HOW to all the WHAT’S needs to be<br />
determined by multiplying the final importance ratings and the weightings from the plannin matrix.<br />
Next step is to set the targets for the HOW’S, also called the HOW MUCH’es (American Supplier<br />
Institute 1994). These targets represents levels of performance for the HOW’S in a way that the<br />
organization believes that is required in oder to be competitive in comparison to competitive<br />
products or services. In order to be specific and measurable each target should be quantified. It is<br />
also important that the targets that are set, are reachable according to the technical sources of the<br />
The HOW’S with the highest final rates are moved to Phase II of Quality Function Deployment, the<br />
parts deployment.<br />
2.6 Conceptual model<br />
Previous sections discussed the literature relevant for the present research study. Based on the<br />
literature findings we developed the conceptual model as depicted in Figure - 7. As discussed in the<br />
literature review, new types of interaction are becoming more significant. For the present research<br />
we focus on virtual communities, which nowadays form the basis of the internet. More specifically,<br />
the concept of the online union can be classified as an online community. The present research seeks<br />
to provide new insights on how to create value by matching the needs of the members of the online<br />
union on the demand side and the design of the online union on the supply side. T<strong>here</strong>fore,<br />
exploratory research followed by a validation study, through a statistically reliable sample of<br />
members of the online union, is applied to identify key performance drivers of the online union.<br />
40