Hawkesbury-Nepean River Environmental Monitoring Program
Hawkesbury-Nepean River Environmental Monitoring Program
Hawkesbury-Nepean River Environmental Monitoring Program
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 6.6: Principal components analysis of water quality, illustrating differences<br />
between sites upstream (US) and downstream (DS) of Yarramundi and among<br />
individual sites<br />
Temporal trends in SIGNAL-based assessments. Average SIGNAL-SG<br />
(Chessman et al. 2007) scores were calculated for macroinvertebrates found at sites<br />
on the main-stem of the <strong>Hawkesbury</strong> <strong>River</strong>, and these data are presented graphically<br />
in Figures 6.7, 6.8 and 6.9. At sites upstream of Yarramundi (Figure 6.7) the average<br />
SIGNAL-SG scores in edge habitats indicated a very consistent pattern over time<br />
that does not suggest major changes have occurred in macroinvertebrate<br />
communities (in terms of average SIGNAL-SG scores). Greater variation was found<br />
at edge sites below Yarramundi (Figure 6.7), but there was an absence of more<br />
recent macroinvertebrate data in these areas. Further sampling at these sites may<br />
help determine whether these sites have also remained relatively stable over this<br />
time period (in terms of average SIGNAL-SG scores).<br />
The large variation between sampling events for the edge habitat may, at least in<br />
part, be due to the types of microhabitats sampled. Sydney Water also sampled<br />
submerged macrophyte habitat in the fluvio-tidal reaches of the <strong>Hawkesbury</strong>, finding<br />
it a more stable habitat with a relatively extensive taxa list when compared with the<br />
edge habitat (C. Besley (SWC) pers. comm. 2008). From 2003 onwards, the<br />
macrophyte habitat was therefore replicated in this reach. Average SIGNAL-SG<br />
scores in macrophyte edge habitats also indicated a very consistent pattern over time<br />
(Figure 6.8), which again does not suggest that major changes have occurred over<br />
time in macroinvertebrate communities in this stretch of the <strong>Hawkesbury</strong>-<strong>Nepean</strong><br />
<strong>River</strong> (in terms of average SIGNAL-SG scores).<br />
Data from riffle habitats in the lower sections of the <strong>Hawkesbury</strong>-<strong>Nepean</strong> <strong>River</strong> were<br />
less common, but, where they occurred, again there was little evidence of major<br />
changes in average SIGNAL-SG scores over time (Figure 6.8). An unusual peak in<br />
average SIGNAL-SG scores occurred at N53 (downstream of Penrith STP) in<br />
autumn 2004; the reasons for this need further exploration (including potentially<br />
looking at relationships with water quality at that time).<br />
Although there appears to be a lack of temporal trends in the average SIGNAL-SG<br />
scores at individual sites, there do appear to be longitudinal differences in average<br />
SIGNAL-SG scores as you move down the river (i.e. from Maldon Weir (N92) to<br />
Sackville (N26); Figure 6.9). The change downstream of Yarramundi is quite<br />
<strong>Hawkesbury</strong> <strong>Nepean</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Monitoring</strong> <strong>Program</strong>: Final Technical Report 29