Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox
Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox
Keil and Delitzsch
Keil and Delitzsch
- Page 43 and 44: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 45 and 46: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 47 and 48: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 49 and 50: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 51 and 52: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 53 and 54: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 55 and 56: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 57 and 58: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 59 and 60: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 61 and 62: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 63 and 64: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 65 and 66: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 67 and 68: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 69 and 70: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 71 and 72: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 73 and 74: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 75 and 76: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 77 and 78: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 79 and 80: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 81 and 82: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 83 and 84: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 85 and 86: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 87 and 88: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 89 and 90: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 91 and 92: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 93: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 97 and 98: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 99 and 100: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 101 and 102: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 103 and 104: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 105 and 106: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 107 and 108: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 109 and 110: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 111 and 112: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 113 and 114: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 115 and 116: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 117 and 118: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 119 and 120: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 121 and 122: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 123 and 124: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 125 and 126: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 127 and 128: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 129 and 130: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 131 and 132: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 133 and 134: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 135 and 136: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 137 and 138: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 139 and 140: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 141 and 142: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 143 and 144: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />
<br />
every commentator. In my earlier commentary <strong>on</strong> <strong>Joshua</strong>, I attempted to solve the difficulty by the<br />
twofold assumpti<strong>on</strong>: first , that v. 12 c<strong>on</strong>tains a supplementary statement, in which the number of the men<br />
posted in ambush is given for the firs time; and sec<strong>on</strong>dly , that the historian forgot to notice that out of the<br />
30,000 men whom <strong>Joshua</strong> chose to make war up<strong>on</strong> Ai, 5000 were set apart to lie in ambush. But, <strong>on</strong><br />
further examinati<strong>on</strong> of the text, I have come to the c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> that the sec<strong>on</strong>d assumpti<strong>on</strong> is irrec<strong>on</strong>cilable<br />
with the distinct words of v. 3, and feel obliged to give it up. On the other hand, I still adhere to the<br />
c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong> that there is not sufficient ground either for the assumpti<strong>on</strong> that vv. 12, 13, c<strong>on</strong>tain an old<br />
marginal gloss that has crept into the text, or for the hypothesis of Ewald and Knobel , that these verses<br />
were introduced by the last editor of the book out of some other document. The last hypothesis amounts<br />
to a charge of thoughtlessness against the latest editor, which is hardly rec<strong>on</strong>cilable with the endeavour,<br />
for which he is praised in other places, to rec<strong>on</strong>cile the discrepancies in the different documents.) - In v.<br />
13a, haa`aam (OT:5971) (the people) is to be taken as the subject of the sentence: "The people had set<br />
all the host, that was <strong>on</strong> the north of the city, and its ambuscade <strong>on</strong> the west of the city." In the night,<br />
namely the night before the army arrived at the north of the town, <strong>Joshua</strong> went through the midst of the<br />
valley, which separated the Israelites from the town, so that in the morning he stood with all the army<br />
close before the town.<br />
Verse 14-23. When the king of Ai saw the Israelites, he hurried out in the morning<br />
against them to battle at the (previously) appointed place ( lamow`eed (OT:4150), in<br />
locum c<strong>on</strong>dictum , as in 1 Sam 20:35) before the steppe ( Arabah , not the valley of<br />
the Jordan, but the steppe or desert of Bethaven; see at Josh 7:2), as he knew nothing<br />
of the ambuscade behind the town.<br />
Verse 15. But the Israelites let them beat them, and fled al<strong>on</strong>g the desert (of<br />
Bethaven).<br />
Verse 16-17. And all the people in the town were called together to pursue the<br />
Israelites, and were drawn away from the town, so that not a man, i.e., not a single<br />
soldier who could take part in the pursuit, remained either in Ai or the neighbouring<br />
town of Bethel, and the town stood open behind them. It is evident from v. 17 that the<br />
inhabitants of Bethel, which was about three hours' journey from Ai, took part in the<br />
battle, probably in c<strong>on</strong>sequence of a treaty which the king of Ai had made with them<br />
in the expectati<strong>on</strong> of a renewed and still str<strong>on</strong>ger attack <strong>on</strong> the part of the Israelites.<br />
http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos43.html (1 of 2) [13/08/2004 01:17:31 p.m.]