Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

davidcox.com.mx
from davidcox.com.mx More from this publisher
22.08.2013 Views

Keil and Delitzsch ong>Commentaryong> on the Old Testament numbers given in the books of Samuel and Kings with those in the books of Chronicles, and is admitted by http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos42.html (3 of 3) [13/08/2004 01:17:30 p.m.]

Keil and Delitzsch ong>Commentaryong> on the Old Testament every commentator. In my earlier commentary on Joshua, I attempted to solve the difficulty by the twofold assumption: first , that v. 12 contains a supplementary statement, in which the number of the men posted in ambush is given for the firs time; and secondly , that the historian forgot to notice that out of the 30,000 men whom Joshua chose to make war upon Ai, 5000 were set apart to lie in ambush. But, on further examination of the text, I have come to the conclusion that the second assumption is irreconcilable with the distinct words of v. 3, and feel obliged to give it up. On the other hand, I still adhere to the conviction that there is not sufficient ground either for the assumption that vv. 12, 13, contain an old marginal gloss that has crept into the text, or for the hypothesis of Ewald and Knobel , that these verses were introduced by the last editor of the book out of some other document. The last hypothesis amounts to a charge of thoughtlessness against the latest editor, which is hardly reconcilable with the endeavour, for which he is praised in other places, to reconcile the discrepancies in the different documents.) - In v. 13a, haa`aam (OT:5971) (the people) is to be taken as the subject of the sentence: "The people had set all the host, that was on the north of the city, and its ambuscade on the west of the city." In the night, namely the night before the army arrived at the north of the town, Joshua went through the midst of the valley, which separated the Israelites from the town, so that in the morning he stood with all the army close before the town. Verse 14-23. When the king of Ai saw the Israelites, he hurried out in the morning against them to battle at the (previously) appointed place ( lamow`eed (OT:4150), in locum condictum , as in 1 Sam 20:35) before the steppe ( Arabah , not the valley of the Jordan, but the steppe or desert of Bethaven; see at Josh 7:2), as he knew nothing of the ambuscade behind the town. Verse 15. But the Israelites let them beat them, and fled along the desert (of Bethaven). Verse 16-17. And all the people in the town were called together to pursue the Israelites, and were drawn away from the town, so that not a man, i.e., not a single soldier who could take part in the pursuit, remained either in Ai or the neighbouring town of Bethel, and the town stood open behind them. It is evident from v. 17 that the inhabitants of Bethel, which was about three hours' journey from Ai, took part in the battle, probably in consequence of a treaty which the king of Ai had made with them in the expectation of a renewed and still stronger attack on the part of the Israelites. http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos43.html (1 of 2) [13/08/2004 01:17:31 p.m.]

<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />

<br />

every commentator. In my earlier commentary <strong>on</strong> <strong>Joshua</strong>, I attempted to solve the difficulty by the<br />

twofold assumpti<strong>on</strong>: first , that v. 12 c<strong>on</strong>tains a supplementary statement, in which the number of the men<br />

posted in ambush is given for the firs time; and sec<strong>on</strong>dly , that the historian forgot to notice that out of the<br />

30,000 men whom <strong>Joshua</strong> chose to make war up<strong>on</strong> Ai, 5000 were set apart to lie in ambush. But, <strong>on</strong><br />

further examinati<strong>on</strong> of the text, I have come to the c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> that the sec<strong>on</strong>d assumpti<strong>on</strong> is irrec<strong>on</strong>cilable<br />

with the distinct words of v. 3, and feel obliged to give it up. On the other hand, I still adhere to the<br />

c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong> that there is not sufficient ground either for the assumpti<strong>on</strong> that vv. 12, 13, c<strong>on</strong>tain an old<br />

marginal gloss that has crept into the text, or for the hypothesis of Ewald and Knobel , that these verses<br />

were introduced by the last editor of the book out of some other document. The last hypothesis amounts<br />

to a charge of thoughtlessness against the latest editor, which is hardly rec<strong>on</strong>cilable with the endeavour,<br />

for which he is praised in other places, to rec<strong>on</strong>cile the discrepancies in the different documents.) - In v.<br />

13a, haa`aam (OT:5971) (the people) is to be taken as the subject of the sentence: "The people had set<br />

all the host, that was <strong>on</strong> the north of the city, and its ambuscade <strong>on</strong> the west of the city." In the night,<br />

namely the night before the army arrived at the north of the town, <strong>Joshua</strong> went through the midst of the<br />

valley, which separated the Israelites from the town, so that in the morning he stood with all the army<br />

close before the town.<br />

Verse 14-23. When the king of Ai saw the Israelites, he hurried out in the morning<br />

against them to battle at the (previously) appointed place ( lamow`eed (OT:4150), in<br />

locum c<strong>on</strong>dictum , as in 1 Sam 20:35) before the steppe ( Arabah , not the valley of<br />

the Jordan, but the steppe or desert of Bethaven; see at Josh 7:2), as he knew nothing<br />

of the ambuscade behind the town.<br />

Verse 15. But the Israelites let them beat them, and fled al<strong>on</strong>g the desert (of<br />

Bethaven).<br />

Verse 16-17. And all the people in the town were called together to pursue the<br />

Israelites, and were drawn away from the town, so that not a man, i.e., not a single<br />

soldier who could take part in the pursuit, remained either in Ai or the neighbouring<br />

town of Bethel, and the town stood open behind them. It is evident from v. 17 that the<br />

inhabitants of Bethel, which was about three hours' journey from Ai, took part in the<br />

battle, probably in c<strong>on</strong>sequence of a treaty which the king of Ai had made with them<br />

in the expectati<strong>on</strong> of a renewed and still str<strong>on</strong>ger attack <strong>on</strong> the part of the Israelites.<br />

http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos43.html (1 of 2) [13/08/2004 01:17:31 p.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!