Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox
Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox
Keil and Delitzsch
Keil and Delitzsch
- Page 29 and 30: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 31 and 32: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 33 and 34: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 35 and 36: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 37 and 38: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 39 and 40: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 41 and 42: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 43 and 44: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 45 and 46: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 47 and 48: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 49 and 50: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 51 and 52: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 53 and 54: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 55 and 56: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 57 and 58: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 59 and 60: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 61 and 62: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 63 and 64: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 65 and 66: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 67 and 68: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 69 and 70: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 71 and 72: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 73 and 74: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 75 and 76: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 77 and 78: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 79: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 83 and 84: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 85 and 86: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 87 and 88: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 89 and 90: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 91 and 92: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 93 and 94: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 95 and 96: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 97 and 98: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 99 and 100: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 101 and 102: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 103 and 104: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 105 and 106: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 107 and 108: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 109 and 110: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 111 and 112: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 113 and 114: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 115 and 116: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 117 and 118: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 119 and 120: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 121 and 122: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 123 and 124: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 125 and 126: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 127 and 128: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 129 and 130: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />
<br />
And the LORD said unto <strong>Joshua</strong>, Get thee up; wherefore liest thou thus up<strong>on</strong> thy<br />
face?<br />
The answer of the Lord, which was addressed to <strong>Joshua</strong> directly and not through the<br />
high priest, breathed anger against the sin of Israel. The questi<strong>on</strong>, "Wherefore liest<br />
thou up<strong>on</strong> thy face?" ("fallest," as in Deut 21:1) involved the reproof that <strong>Joshua</strong> had<br />
no reas<strong>on</strong> to doubt the fidelity of the Lord. Instead of seeking for the cause of the<br />
calamity in God, he ought to seek it in the sin of the people.<br />
Verse 11. Israel had sinned, and that very grievously. This is affirmed in the clauses<br />
which follow, and which are rendered emphatic by the repetiti<strong>on</strong> of gam (OT:1571) as<br />
an expressi<strong>on</strong> of displeasure. The sin of <strong>on</strong>e man was resting as a burden up<strong>on</strong> the<br />
whole nati<strong>on</strong> in the manner explained above (<strong>on</strong> v. 1). This sin was a breach of the<br />
covenant, being a transgressi<strong>on</strong> of the obligati<strong>on</strong> into which the people had entered in<br />
their covenant with the Lord, to keep His commandments (Ex 19:8; 24:7); yea, it was<br />
a grasping at the ban, and a theft, and a c<strong>on</strong>cealment, and an appropriati<strong>on</strong> of that<br />
which was stolen to their own use. The first three clauses describe the sin in its<br />
relati<strong>on</strong> to God, as a grievous offence; the three following according to its true<br />
character, as a great, obstinate, and reckless crime. "They have put it am<strong>on</strong>g their own<br />
stuff" (house furniture), viz., to use and appropriate it as their own property. As all that<br />
had been stolen was a property c<strong>on</strong>secrated to the Lord, the appropriati<strong>on</strong> of it to<br />
private use was the height of wickedness.<br />
Verse 12. On account of this sin the Israelites could not stand before their foes,<br />
because they had fallen under the ban (cf. Josh 6:18). And until this ban had been<br />
removed from their midst, the Lord would not help them any further.<br />
Verse 13-15. <strong>Joshua</strong> was to take away this ban from the nati<strong>on</strong>. To discover who had<br />
laid hands up<strong>on</strong> the ban, he was to direct the people to sanctify themselves for the<br />
following day (see at Josh 3:5), and then to cause them to come before God according<br />
http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos37.html (1 of 3) [13/08/2004 01:17:25 p.m.]