Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

davidcox.com.mx
from davidcox.com.mx More from this publisher
22.08.2013 Views

Keil and Delitzsch ong>Commentaryong> on the Old Testament should come and surround the Israelites, and destroy them without a single trace from off the face of the earth. (Note: Calovius has therefore given the correct interpretation: "When they have destroyed our name, after Thou hast chosen us to be Thy people, and brought us hither with such great wonders, what will become of Thy name? Our name is of little moment, but wilt Thou consult the honour of Thine own name, if Thou destroyest us? For Thou didst promise us this land; and what people is there that will honour Thy name if ours should be destroyed?") In the words, "the Canaanites and all the inhabitants of the land," there is involved the thought that there were other people living in Canaan beside the Canaanites, e.g., the Philistines. The question, "What wilt Thou do with regard to Thy great name?" signifies, according to the parallel passages, Ex 32:11-12; Num 14:13ff., Deut 9:28, "How wilt Thou preserve Thy great name, which Thou hast acquired thus far in the sight of all nations through the miraculous guidance of Israel, from being misunderstood and blasphemed among the heathen?" ("what wilt Thou do?" as in Gen 26:29). Joshua 7:10-15 http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos36.html (2 of 2) [13/08/2004 01:17:23 p.m.]

Keil and Delitzsch ong>Commentaryong> on the Old Testament And the LORD said unto Joshua, Get thee up; wherefore liest thou thus upon thy face? The answer of the Lord, which was addressed to Joshua directly and not through the high priest, breathed anger against the sin of Israel. The question, "Wherefore liest thou upon thy face?" ("fallest," as in Deut 21:1) involved the reproof that Joshua had no reason to doubt the fidelity of the Lord. Instead of seeking for the cause of the calamity in God, he ought to seek it in the sin of the people. Verse 11. Israel had sinned, and that very grievously. This is affirmed in the clauses which follow, and which are rendered emphatic by the repetition of gam (OT:1571) as an expression of displeasure. The sin of one man was resting as a burden upon the whole nation in the manner explained above (on v. 1). This sin was a breach of the covenant, being a transgression of the obligation into which the people had entered in their covenant with the Lord, to keep His commandments (Ex 19:8; 24:7); yea, it was a grasping at the ban, and a theft, and a concealment, and an appropriation of that which was stolen to their own use. The first three clauses describe the sin in its relation to God, as a grievous offence; the three following according to its true character, as a great, obstinate, and reckless crime. "They have put it among their own stuff" (house furniture), viz., to use and appropriate it as their own property. As all that had been stolen was a property consecrated to the Lord, the appropriation of it to private use was the height of wickedness. Verse 12. On account of this sin the Israelites could not stand before their foes, because they had fallen under the ban (cf. Josh 6:18). And until this ban had been removed from their midst, the Lord would not help them any further. Verse 13-15. Joshua was to take away this ban from the nation. To discover who had laid hands upon the ban, he was to direct the people to sanctify themselves for the following day (see at Josh 3:5), and then to cause them to come before God according http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos37.html (1 of 3) [13/08/2004 01:17:25 p.m.]

<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />

<br />

And the LORD said unto <strong>Joshua</strong>, Get thee up; wherefore liest thou thus up<strong>on</strong> thy<br />

face?<br />

The answer of the Lord, which was addressed to <strong>Joshua</strong> directly and not through the<br />

high priest, breathed anger against the sin of Israel. The questi<strong>on</strong>, "Wherefore liest<br />

thou up<strong>on</strong> thy face?" ("fallest," as in Deut 21:1) involved the reproof that <strong>Joshua</strong> had<br />

no reas<strong>on</strong> to doubt the fidelity of the Lord. Instead of seeking for the cause of the<br />

calamity in God, he ought to seek it in the sin of the people.<br />

Verse 11. Israel had sinned, and that very grievously. This is affirmed in the clauses<br />

which follow, and which are rendered emphatic by the repetiti<strong>on</strong> of gam (OT:1571) as<br />

an expressi<strong>on</strong> of displeasure. The sin of <strong>on</strong>e man was resting as a burden up<strong>on</strong> the<br />

whole nati<strong>on</strong> in the manner explained above (<strong>on</strong> v. 1). This sin was a breach of the<br />

covenant, being a transgressi<strong>on</strong> of the obligati<strong>on</strong> into which the people had entered in<br />

their covenant with the Lord, to keep His commandments (Ex 19:8; 24:7); yea, it was<br />

a grasping at the ban, and a theft, and a c<strong>on</strong>cealment, and an appropriati<strong>on</strong> of that<br />

which was stolen to their own use. The first three clauses describe the sin in its<br />

relati<strong>on</strong> to God, as a grievous offence; the three following according to its true<br />

character, as a great, obstinate, and reckless crime. "They have put it am<strong>on</strong>g their own<br />

stuff" (house furniture), viz., to use and appropriate it as their own property. As all that<br />

had been stolen was a property c<strong>on</strong>secrated to the Lord, the appropriati<strong>on</strong> of it to<br />

private use was the height of wickedness.<br />

Verse 12. On account of this sin the Israelites could not stand before their foes,<br />

because they had fallen under the ban (cf. Josh 6:18). And until this ban had been<br />

removed from their midst, the Lord would not help them any further.<br />

Verse 13-15. <strong>Joshua</strong> was to take away this ban from the nati<strong>on</strong>. To discover who had<br />

laid hands up<strong>on</strong> the ban, he was to direct the people to sanctify themselves for the<br />

following day (see at Josh 3:5), and then to cause them to come before God according<br />

http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos37.html (1 of 3) [13/08/2004 01:17:25 p.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!