Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox
Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox
Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />
<br />
But this does not explain the true object of the miracle, or the reas<strong>on</strong> why God gave<br />
up this town to the Israelites without any fighting <strong>on</strong> their part, through the<br />
miraculous overthrow of their walls. The reas<strong>on</strong> for this we have to look for in the<br />
fact that Jericho was not <strong>on</strong>ly the first, but the str<strong>on</strong>gest town of Canaan, and as such<br />
was the key to the c<strong>on</strong>quest of the whole land, the possessi<strong>on</strong> of which would open<br />
the way to the whole, and give the whole, as it were, into their hands. The Lord<br />
would give His people the first and str<strong>on</strong>gest town of Canaan, as the first-fruits of the<br />
land, without any effort <strong>on</strong> their part, as a sign that He was about to give them the<br />
whole land for a possessi<strong>on</strong>, according to His promise; in order that they might not<br />
regard the c<strong>on</strong>quest of it as their own work, or the fruit of their own exerti<strong>on</strong>s, and<br />
look up<strong>on</strong> the land as a well-merited possessi<strong>on</strong> which they could do as they pleased<br />
with, but that they might ever use it as a gracious gift from the Lord, which he had<br />
merely c<strong>on</strong>ferred up<strong>on</strong> them as a trust, and which He could take away again,<br />
whenever they might fall from Him, and render themselves unworthy of His grace.<br />
This design <strong>on</strong> the part of God would of necessity become very obvious in the case of<br />
so str<strong>on</strong>gly fortified a town as Jericho, whose walls would appear impregnable to a<br />
people that had grown up in the desert and was so utterly without experience in the<br />
art of besieging or storming fortified places, and in fact would necessarily remain<br />
impregnable, at all events for a l<strong>on</strong>g time, without the interpositi<strong>on</strong> of God. But if this<br />
was the reas<strong>on</strong> why the Lord gave up Jericho to the Israelites by a miracle, it does not<br />
explain either the c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong> between the blast of trumpets or the war-cry of the<br />
people and the falling of the walls, or the reas<strong>on</strong> for the divine instructi<strong>on</strong>s that the<br />
town was to be marched round every day for seven days, and seven times <strong>on</strong> the<br />
seventh day. Yet as this was an appointment of divine wisdom, it must have had some<br />
meaning.<br />
The significance of this repeated marching round the town culminates unquesti<strong>on</strong>ably<br />
in the ark of the covenant and the trumpet-blast of the priests who went before the<br />
ark. In the account before us the ark is c<strong>on</strong>stantly called the ark of the Lord, to show<br />
that the Lord, who was enthr<strong>on</strong>ed up<strong>on</strong> the cherubim of the ark, was going round the<br />
hostile town in the midst of His people; whilst in v. 8 Jehovah himself is menti<strong>on</strong>ed<br />
http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos30.html (1 of 3) [13/08/2004 01:17:18 p.m.]