Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox
Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox
Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />
<br />
children who had been born between the departure from Egypt and the c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> of the covenant at<br />
Sinai. We are also prevented from pressing the little word "all" in this manner by the evident meaning of<br />
the words before us. In vv. 4 and 5 the Israelites are divided into two classes:<br />
(1) All the people that came out of Egypt and were circumcised; and (2) All the<br />
people that were born in the desert and were uncircumcised. The first of these died in<br />
the wilderness, the sec<strong>on</strong>d came to Canaan and were circumcised by <strong>Joshua</strong> at Gilgal.<br />
But if we should press the word "all" in these clauses, it would follow that all the<br />
male children who were under twenty years of age at the time of the exodus, either<br />
died in the desert or were circumcised a sec<strong>on</strong>d time at Gilgal. Lastly, it does not<br />
follow from v. 6 that the circumcisi<strong>on</strong> was suspended for exactly forty years; for the<br />
forty years during which Israel journeyed in the desert until the murmuring<br />
generati<strong>on</strong> was c<strong>on</strong>sumed, are to be interpreted by Num 14:33-34, and amounted,<br />
chr<strong>on</strong>ologically c<strong>on</strong>sidered, to no more than thirty-eight years and a few m<strong>on</strong>ths (see<br />
the commentary <strong>on</strong> Num. 24:28 ff.). On the other hand, the other very general view<br />
which Kurtz adopts-namely, that the circumcisi<strong>on</strong> was omitted during the journey<br />
through the desert <strong>on</strong> account of the hardships c<strong>on</strong>nected with travelling, and because<br />
it was impossible to have regard to particular families who might wish for l<strong>on</strong>ger rest<br />
<strong>on</strong> account of their children who had just been circumcised, and were suffering from<br />
the wound, just at the time when they had to decamp and journey <strong>on</strong>ward, and they<br />
could not well be left behind-throws but little light up<strong>on</strong> the subject, as the<br />
assumpti<strong>on</strong> that the people were c<strong>on</strong>stantly wandering about for forty years is<br />
altogether an unfounded <strong>on</strong>e.<br />
The Israelites were not always wandering about: not <strong>on</strong>ly did they stay at Sinai for<br />
eleven whole m<strong>on</strong>ths, but even after that they halted for weeks and m<strong>on</strong>ths at the<br />
different places of encampment, when they might have circumcised their children<br />
without the slightest danger of their suffering from the wound.) it did not commence<br />
till the sec<strong>on</strong>d year of their journey, viz., at the time when the murmuring nati<strong>on</strong> was<br />
rejected at Kadesh (Num 14); so that by "all the people that were born in the<br />
wilderness" we are to understand those who were born after that time, and during the<br />
last thirty-eight years of their wanderings, just as "all the people that came out of<br />
http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos22.html (1 of 3) [13/08/2004 01:17:08 p.m.]