22.08.2013 Views

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />

Verse 38-39. Jire<strong>on</strong> ( Ir<strong>on</strong> ) is probably the present village of Jarûn , an hour to the<br />

south-east of Bint-Jebeil, with the ruins of an ancient Christian church ( Seetzen , ii.<br />

pp. 123-4; Van de Velde , R. i. p. 133). Migdal-el , so far as the name is c<strong>on</strong>cerned,<br />

might be Magdala (Matt 15:39), <strong>on</strong> the western shore of the Lake of Gennesareth,<br />

between Capernaum and Tiberias ( Rob. iii. pp. 279ff.); the <strong>on</strong>ly difficulty is, that the<br />

towns up<strong>on</strong> this lake have already been menti<strong>on</strong>ed in v. 35. Knobel c<strong>on</strong>nects Migdalel<br />

with Chorem , so as to form <strong>on</strong>e name, and finds Migdal el Chorem in the present<br />

Mejdel Kerum , <strong>on</strong> the west of Rameh ( Seetzen , ii. p. 130; Van de Velde , i. p.<br />

215), a comm<strong>on</strong> Mahometan village. But there is nothing to favour this combinati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

except the similarity in sound between the two names; whereas it has against it not<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly the situati<strong>on</strong> of the village, which was so far to the west, being not more than<br />

three hours from Acca, that the territory of Naphtali can hardly have reached so far,<br />

but also the very small resemblance between Chorem and Kerum , not to menti<strong>on</strong> the<br />

fact that the accents separate Chorem from Migdal-el , whilst the omissi<strong>on</strong> of the<br />

copula ( vav ) before Chorem cannot have any weight, as the copula is also wanting<br />

before Zer and Rakkath. Chorem and Beth-anath have not yet been discovered.<br />

From the latter place Naphtali was unable to expel the Canaanites (Judg 1:33). Bethshemesh<br />

, a different place from the town of the same name in Issachar (v. 22), is also<br />

still unknown. The total number of towns is given as nineteen, whereas <strong>on</strong>ly sixteen<br />

are menti<strong>on</strong>ed by name. It is hardly correct to seek for the missing places am<strong>on</strong>g the<br />

border towns menti<strong>on</strong>ed in vv. 33 and 34, as the enumerati<strong>on</strong> of the towns themselves<br />

is introduced by mibªtsaar (OT:4014) wª`aareey (OT:5892) in v. 35, and in this way<br />

the list of towns is separated from the descripti<strong>on</strong> of the boundaries. To this we may<br />

add, that the town of Karthan or Kirjathaim, which Naphtali gave up to the Levites<br />

(Josh 21:32; 1 Chr<strong>on</strong> 6:61), does not occur either am<strong>on</strong>g the border towns or in the<br />

list of towns, from which we may see that the list of towns is an imperfect <strong>on</strong>e.<br />

<strong>Joshua</strong> 19:40-48<br />

<br />

http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos123.html (2 of 2) [13/08/2004 01:19:13 p.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!