22.08.2013 Views

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />

great perplexity, until C. v. Raumer succeeded in removing the difficulty, by showing<br />

that the district of the sixty towns of Jair, which was up<strong>on</strong> the eastern side of the<br />

Jordan, is called Judah here, or reck<strong>on</strong>ed as bel<strong>on</strong>ging to Judah, because Jair, the<br />

possessor of these towns, was a descendant of Judah <strong>on</strong> the father's side through<br />

Hezr<strong>on</strong> (1 Chr<strong>on</strong> 2:5,21-22); whereas in Josh 13:30, and Num 32:41, he is reck<strong>on</strong>ed<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tra morem , i.e., against the rule laid down in Num 36:7, as a descendant of<br />

Manasseh, <strong>on</strong> account of his descent from Machir the Manassite, <strong>on</strong> his mother's side.<br />

(Note: See C. v. Raumer's article <strong>on</strong> "Judaea <strong>on</strong> the east of Jordan," in Tholuck's litt. Anz. 1834, Nos. 1<br />

and 2, and his Palästina, pp. 233ff. ed. 4; and for the arbitrary attempts that had been made to explain the<br />

passage by alterati<strong>on</strong>s of the text and in other ways, see Rosenmüller's Bibl. Alterthk. ii. 1, pp. 301-2; and<br />

<strong>Keil</strong>'s Comm. <strong>on</strong> <strong>Joshua</strong>, pp. 438-9.)<br />

Verse 35. The fortified towns of Naphtali were the following. Ziddim: unknown,<br />

though Knobel suggests that "it may possibly be preserved in Chirbet es Saudeh , to<br />

the west of the southern extremity of the Lake of Tiberias ( Rob. iii. App.);" but this<br />

place is to the west of the Wady Bessum, i.e., in the territory of Issachar. Zer is also<br />

unknown. As the LXX and Syriac give the name as Zor, Knobel c<strong>on</strong>nects it with<br />

Kerak , which signifies fortress as well as Zor (= maatsowr (OT:4692)), a heap of<br />

ruins at the southern end of the lake ( Rob. iii. p. 263), the place which Josephus calls<br />

Taricheae (see Reland , p. 1026) - a very doubtful combinati<strong>on</strong>! Hammath (i.e.,<br />

thermae ), a Levitical town called Hammaoth-dor in Josh 21:32, and Hamm<strong>on</strong> in 1<br />

Chr<strong>on</strong> 6:61, was situated, according to statements in the Talmud, somewhere near the<br />

later city of Tiberias, <strong>on</strong> the western shore of the Lake of Gennesareth, and was no<br />

doubt identical with the koo'mee Ammaou's in the neighbourhood of Tiberias, a<br />

place with warm baths ( Jos. Ant. xviii. 2, 3; Bell. Judg. iv. 1, 3).<br />

There are warm springs still to be found half an hour to the south of Tabaria, which<br />

are used as baths ( Burckhardt , Syr. pp. 573-4; Rob. iii. pp. 258ff.). Rakkath<br />

(according to the Talm. and Rabb. ripa littus ) was<br />

<br />

http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos122.html (2 of 2) [13/08/2004 01:19:11 p.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!