22.08.2013 Views

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />

<br />

c<strong>on</strong>jecture. For, in the first place, not <strong>on</strong>ly would it be a surprising thing to find the<br />

places menti<strong>on</strong>ed as boundaries included am<strong>on</strong>g the towns of the territory bel<strong>on</strong>ging<br />

to the tribe, especially as some of the places so menti<strong>on</strong>ed did not bel<strong>on</strong>g to Zebulun<br />

at all; but the copula vav , with which the enumerati<strong>on</strong> of the towns commences, is<br />

equally surprising, since this is introduced in other cases with he'aariym (OT:5892)<br />

wªhaayuw (OT:1961) ( wayihªyuw (OT:1961)), e.g., Josh 18:21; 15:21. And, in the<br />

sec<strong>on</strong>d place, it is not a probable thing in itself, that, with the excepti<strong>on</strong> of the five<br />

towns menti<strong>on</strong>ed in v. 15, the other towns of Zebulun should all be situated up<strong>on</strong> the<br />

border. And lastly, the towns of Kartah and Dimnah , which Zebulun gave up to the<br />

Levites (Josh 21:34), are actually wanting. Under these circumstances, it is a natural<br />

c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> that there is a gap in the text here, just as in Josh 15:59 and 21:36.<br />

<strong>Joshua</strong> 19:17-23<br />

And the fourth lot came out to Issachar, for the children of Issachar according to<br />

their families.<br />

The Inheritance of Issachar. - In this instance <strong>on</strong>ly towns are given, and the<br />

boundaries are not delineated, with the excepti<strong>on</strong> of the eastern porti<strong>on</strong> of the<br />

northern boundary and the boundary line; at the same time, they may easily be traced<br />

from the boundaries of the surrounding tribes. Issachar received for the most part the<br />

large and very fertile plain of Jezreel (see at Josh 17:16, and Ritter , Erdk. xvi. pp.<br />

689ff.), and was bounded <strong>on</strong> the south by Manasseh, <strong>on</strong> the west by Manasseh and<br />

Asher, <strong>on</strong> the north by Zebulun, and farther east by Naphtali also, and <strong>on</strong> the east by<br />

the Jordan.<br />

Verse 18. "And their boundary was towards Jezreel," i.e., their territory extended<br />

bey<strong>on</strong>d Jezreel. Jezreel , the summer residence of Ahab and his house (1 Kings 18:45-<br />

46, etc.), was situated up<strong>on</strong> a mountain, with an extensive and splendid prospect over<br />

the large plain that was called by its name. It was afterwards called Esdraela , a place<br />

described in the Onom. ( s. v. Jezreel ) as standing between Scythopolis and Legio; it<br />

http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos117.html (1 of 2) [13/08/2004 01:19:05 p.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!