22.08.2013 Views

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />

<br />

Knobel supposes it to have been <strong>on</strong> the site of the present Kabate ( Seetzen , ii. p.<br />

166), Kubatiyeh , an hour and a half to the south of Jenin ( Rob. iii. 154), assuming<br />

that Michmethah might also have been pr<strong>on</strong>ounced Chemathah , and that b may have<br />

been substituted for m. But Kabate is six hours to the north of Shechem, and therefore<br />

was certainly not "before Shechem" (Josh 17:7). It then turned "eastward to Taanathshiloh"<br />

( Eeena'th Seeloo' , LXX), according to the Onom. ( s. v. Thenath ) ten<br />

Roman miles from Neapolis (Sichem), <strong>on</strong> the way to the Jordan, most probably the<br />

Thena of Ptol. (v. 16, 5), the present Tana, Ain Tana , a heap of ruins <strong>on</strong> the south-east<br />

of Nabulus, where there are large cisterns to be found (see Rob. Bibl. Res. p. 295;<br />

Ritter , Erdk.<br />

xv. p. 471). And "then went by <strong>on</strong> the east to Janoah" (i.e., Jano in Acrabittena<br />

regi<strong>on</strong>e , twelve Roman miles from Neapolis: Onom. ), the present ruins of Janûn , a<br />

miserable village, with extensive ruins of great antiquity, about three hours to the<br />

south-east of Nabulus, three-quarters of an hour to the north-east of Akrabeh ( Rob.<br />

Bibl. Res. p. 297; Van de Velde , R. ii. p. 268).<br />

<strong>Joshua</strong> 16:7<br />

And it went down from Janohah to Ataroth, and to Naarath, and came to Jericho,<br />

and went out at Jordan.<br />

From Janoah the boundary went down "to Ataroth and Naarath," Ataroth , a different<br />

place from the Ataroth or Atroth-addar menti<strong>on</strong>ed in vv. 3 and 5, is apparently to be<br />

sought for <strong>on</strong> the eastern slope of the mountains by the side of the Ghor, judging from<br />

the expressi<strong>on</strong> "went down;" but it has not yet been discovered. Naarath , probably<br />

the same as Naaran , in eastern Ephraim (1 Chr<strong>on</strong> 7:28), is described in the Onom. ( s.<br />

v. Naaratha ) as viculus Judaeorum Naorath , five Roman miles (i.e., two hours) from<br />

Jericho, probably <strong>on</strong> the north-east. The boundary line then touched Jericho, i.e., the<br />

district of Jericho, namely <strong>on</strong> the north side of the district, as Jericho was allotted to<br />

the tribe of Benjamin (Josh 18:21). At this point it also coincided with the southern<br />

boundary of the tribe of Joseph (v. 1) and the northern boundary of Benjamin (Josh<br />

18:12).<br />

http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos105.html (1 of 2) [13/08/2004 01:18:50 p.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!