22.08.2013 Views

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />

from the Jezreel in the plain of Esdrael<strong>on</strong>, has not yet been discovered. This also<br />

applies to Jokdeam and Zanoah , which are <strong>on</strong>ly met with here.<br />

Verse 57. Cain ( Hakkain ) is possibly the same as Jukin , <strong>on</strong> the south-east of<br />

Hebr<strong>on</strong> ( Rob. ii. p. 449). Gibeah cannot be the Gabatha near Bethlehem, menti<strong>on</strong>ed<br />

in the Onom. ( s. v. Gabatha<strong>on</strong> ), or the Gibea menti<strong>on</strong>ed by Robins<strong>on</strong> (ii. p. 327),<br />

i.e., the village of Jeba , <strong>on</strong> a hill in the Wady el Musurr, as this does not come within<br />

the limits of the present group; it must rather be <strong>on</strong>e of the two places ( Gebaa and<br />

Gebatha ) described as viculi c<strong>on</strong>tra orientalem plagam Daromae , though their<br />

situati<strong>on</strong> has not yet been discovered. Timnah , probably the place already menti<strong>on</strong>ed<br />

in Gen 38:12ff., has not been discovered.<br />

Verse 58,59. The fourth group of six towns, <strong>on</strong> the north of Hebr<strong>on</strong> or of the last two<br />

groups. - Halhul , according to the Onom. ( s. v. Elul ) a place near Hebr<strong>on</strong> named<br />

Alula , has been preserved in the ruins of Halhûl , an hour and a half to the north of<br />

Hebr<strong>on</strong> ( Rob. i. p. 319, ii. p. 186, and Bibl. Res. p. 281). Beth-zur , which was<br />

fortified by Rehoboam (2 Chr<strong>on</strong> 11:7), and is frequently menti<strong>on</strong>ed in the time of the<br />

Maccabees as a border defence against the Idumaeans (1 Macc. 4:29, 61, etc.), was<br />

twenty (? fifteen) Roman miles from Jerusalem, according to the Onom. ( s. v. Bethzur<br />

), <strong>on</strong> the road to Hebr<strong>on</strong>. It is the present heap of ruins called Beit-zur <strong>on</strong> the<br />

north-west of Halhûl ( Rob. Bibl. Res. pp. 276-7; Ritter , Erdk. xvi. pp. 236, 267-8).<br />

Gedor , the ruins of Jedûr , an hour and a half to the north-west ( Rob. ii. p. 338; Bibl.<br />

Res. pp. 282-3).<br />

Verse 59. Maarath and Eltek<strong>on</strong> have not yet been discovered. Beth-anoth (probably<br />

a c<strong>on</strong>tracti<strong>on</strong> of Beth-ayanoth ) has been discovered by Wolcott in the ruins of Beitanum<br />

, <strong>on</strong> the east of Halhûl ( Rob. Bibl. Res.<br />

p. 279; cf. Pal. ii. p. 186).<br />

Between vv. 59 and 60, the fifth group of towns given in the Septuagint is wanting in<br />

the Masoretic text. This group lay to the north of the fourth, and reached as far as<br />

Jerusalem, It comprised a district in which even now<br />

http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos101.html (2 of 3) [13/08/2004 01:18:46 p.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!