22.08.2013 Views

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />

<br />

( Tobler , pp. 150-1), with which Knobel identifies it, is up<strong>on</strong> the mountains and not<br />

in the plain. Mizpeh , i.e., specula , a different place from the Mizpeh of Benjamin<br />

(Josh 18:26), was <strong>on</strong> the north of Eleutheropolis, according to the Onom. ( s. v.<br />

Maspha ), and therefore may possibly be the castle Alba Specula , or Alba Custodia<br />

of the middle ages, the present Tell es Saphieh , in the middle of the plain and up<strong>on</strong><br />

the top of a lofty hill, from which there is an extensive prospect in all directi<strong>on</strong>s (see<br />

Rob. ii. p. 363). Joktheel has possibly been preserved in the ruins of Keitulaneh (<br />

Rob. Pal. iii. App.), which are said to lie in that neighbourhood.<br />

Verse 39. Lachish , i.e., Um Lakis (see at Josh 10:3). Bozkath is unknown: according<br />

to Knobel , it may possibly be the ruins of Tubakah , <strong>on</strong> the south of Um Lakis and<br />

Ajlan ( Rob. ii. pp. 388, 648). Egl<strong>on</strong> , i.e., Ajlan; see at Josh 10:3.<br />

Verse 40. Cabb<strong>on</strong> , probably the heap of ruins called Kubeibeh or Kebeibeh , "which<br />

must at some time or other have been a str<strong>on</strong>g fortificati<strong>on</strong>, and have formed the key<br />

to the central mountains of Judah" ( v. de Velde , R. ii. p.<br />

156), and which lie to the south of Beit-jibrin, and two hours and a half to the east of<br />

Ajlan ( Rob. Pal. ii. p. 394). Lachmas: according to Knobel a corrupti<strong>on</strong> of Lachmam,<br />

which is the reading given in many MSS and editi<strong>on</strong>s, whilst the Vulgate has<br />

Leheman , and Luther (and the Eng. Ver ). Lahmam. Knobel c<strong>on</strong>nects it with the ruins<br />

of el Lahem to the south of Beit-jibrin ( Tobler ). Kithlish ( Chitlis ) is unknown,<br />

unless it is to be found in Tell Chilchis , to the S.S.E. of Beit-jibrin ( V. de Velde , R.<br />

ii. p. 157).<br />

Verse 41. Gederoth, Beth-dag<strong>on</strong> , and Naamah have not yet been traced. The village<br />

menti<strong>on</strong>ed in the Onom. ( s. v. Beth-dag<strong>on</strong> ) as grandis vicus Capher-dag<strong>on</strong> , and said<br />

to lie between Diospolis and Jamnia , the present Beit-dejan ( Rob. iii. p. 30), was far<br />

bey<strong>on</strong>d the northern boundary of the tribe of Judah. Makkedah: see at Josh 10:10.<br />

Verse 42-44. The third group, c<strong>on</strong>sisting of the towns in the southern half of the hilly<br />

regi<strong>on</strong>: nine towns.<br />

http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos98.html (1 of 2) [13/08/2004 01:18:42 p.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!