Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

davidcox.com.mx
from davidcox.com.mx More from this publisher
22.08.2013 Views

Keil and Delitzsch ong>Commentaryong> on the Old Testament see at Josh 10:10. Verse 36. Sharaim , which was on the west of Socoh and Azekah, according to 1 Sam 17:52, and is called Dakari'm or Dargarei'm in the Sept. , is probably to be sought for in the present Tell Zakariya and the village of Kefr Zakariya opposite, between which there is the broad deep valley called Wady Sumt, which is only twenty minutes in breadth ( Rob. ii. p. 350). This is the more probable as the Hebrew name is a dual. Adithaim is unknown. Gederah is possibly the same as the Gederoth which was taken by the Philistines in the time of Ahaz (2 Chron 28:18), and the Gedrus of the Onom. ( s. v. Gaedur , or Gahedur ), ten Roman miles to the south of Diospolis, on the road to Eleutheropolis, as the Gederoth in v. 41 was in the actual plain, and therefore did not stand between Diospolis and Eleutheropolis. Gederothaim is supposed by Winer, Knobel , and others, to be an ancient gloss. This is possible no doubt, but it is not certain, as neither the omission of the name from the Sept. , nor the circumstance that the full number of towns is given as fourteen, and that this is not the number obtained if we reckon Gederothaim, can be adduced as a decisive proof, since this difference may have arisen in the same manner as the similar discrepancy in v. 32. Verse 37-41. The second group, containing the towns of the actual plain in its full extent from north to south, between the hilly region and the line of coast held by the Philistines: sixteen towns in all. Verse 37. Zenan , probably the same as Zaanan (Mic 1:11), is supposed by Knobel to be the ruins of Chirbet-es-Senat , a short distance to the north of Beit-jibrin ( Tobler , Dritte Wand. p. 124). Hadashah , according to the Mishnah Erub. v. vi. the smallest place in Judah, containing only fifty houses, is unknown, and a different place from the Adasa of 1 Macc. 7:40, 45, and Joseph. Ant. xii. 10, 5, as this was to the north of Jerusalem ( Onom. ) . - Migdal-gad is unknown. Knobel supposes it to be the small hill called Jedeideh , with ruins upon it, towards the north of Beit-jibrin ( V. de Velde , R. ii. pp. 162, 188). http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos97.html (2 of 3) [13/08/2004 01:18:41 p.m.]

Keil and Delitzsch ong>Commentaryong> on the Old Testament Verse 38. Dilean is unknown; for Bet Dula , three full hours to the east of Beit-jibrin, with some relics of antiquity http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos97.html (3 of 3) [13/08/2004 01:18:41 p.m.]

<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />

see at Josh 10:10.<br />

Verse 36. Sharaim , which was <strong>on</strong> the west of Socoh and Azekah, according to 1<br />

Sam 17:52, and is called Dakari'm or Dargarei'm in the Sept. , is probably to be<br />

sought for in the present Tell Zakariya and the village of Kefr Zakariya opposite,<br />

between which there is the broad deep valley called Wady Sumt, which is <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

twenty minutes in breadth ( Rob. ii. p. 350). This is the more probable as the Hebrew<br />

name is a dual. Adithaim is unknown. Gederah is possibly the same as the Gederoth<br />

which was taken by the Philistines in the time of Ahaz (2 Chr<strong>on</strong> 28:18), and the<br />

Gedrus of the Onom. ( s. v. Gaedur , or Gahedur ), ten Roman miles to the south of<br />

Diospolis, <strong>on</strong> the road to Eleutheropolis, as the Gederoth in v. 41 was in the actual<br />

plain, and therefore did not stand between Diospolis and Eleutheropolis.<br />

Gederothaim is supposed by Winer, Knobel , and others, to be an ancient gloss. This<br />

is possible no doubt, but it is not certain, as neither the omissi<strong>on</strong> of the name from the<br />

Sept. , nor the circumstance that the full number of towns is given as fourteen, and<br />

that this is not the number obtained if we reck<strong>on</strong> Gederothaim, can be adduced as a<br />

decisive proof, since this difference may have arisen in the same manner as the<br />

similar discrepancy in v. 32.<br />

Verse 37-41. The sec<strong>on</strong>d group, c<strong>on</strong>taining the towns of the actual plain in its full<br />

extent from north to south, between the hilly regi<strong>on</strong> and the line of coast held by the<br />

Philistines: sixteen towns in all.<br />

Verse 37. Zenan , probably the same as Zaanan (Mic 1:11), is supposed by Knobel to<br />

be the ruins of Chirbet-es-Senat , a short distance to the north of Beit-jibrin ( Tobler ,<br />

Dritte Wand. p. 124). Hadashah , according to the Mishnah Erub. v. vi. the smallest<br />

place in Judah, c<strong>on</strong>taining <strong>on</strong>ly fifty houses, is unknown, and a different place from<br />

the Adasa of 1 Macc. 7:40, 45, and Joseph. Ant. xii. 10, 5, as this was to the north of<br />

Jerusalem ( Onom. ) . - Migdal-gad is unknown. Knobel supposes it to be the small<br />

hill called Jedeideh , with ruins up<strong>on</strong> it, towards the north of Beit-jibrin ( V. de Velde<br />

, R. ii. pp. 162, 188).<br />

http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos97.html (2 of 3) [13/08/2004 01:18:41 p.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!