Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox
Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox
Keil and Delitzsch
Keil and Delitzsch
- Page 167 and 168: http://207.44.232.113/~bible/commen
- Page 169 and 170: http://207.44.232.113/~bible/commen
- Page 171 and 172: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 173 and 174: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 175 and 176: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 177 and 178: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 179 and 180: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 181 and 182: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 183 and 184: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 185 and 186: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 187 and 188: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 189 and 190: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 191 and 192: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 193 and 194: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 195 and 196: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 197 and 198: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 199 and 200: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 201 and 202: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 203 and 204: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 205 and 206: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 207 and 208: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 209 and 210: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 211 and 212: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 213 and 214: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 215 and 216: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 217: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 221 and 222: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 223 and 224: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 225 and 226: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 227 and 228: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 229 and 230: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 231 and 232: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 233 and 234: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 235 and 236: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 237 and 238: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 239 and 240: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 241 and 242: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 243 and 244: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 245 and 246: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 247 and 248: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 249 and 250: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 251 and 252: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 253 and 254: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 255 and 256: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 257 and 258: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 259 and 260: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 261 and 262: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 263 and 264: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 265 and 266: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
- Page 267 and 268: Keil and Delitzsch Commenta
<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />
see at Josh 10:10.<br />
Verse 36. Sharaim , which was <strong>on</strong> the west of Socoh and Azekah, according to 1<br />
Sam 17:52, and is called Dakari'm or Dargarei'm in the Sept. , is probably to be<br />
sought for in the present Tell Zakariya and the village of Kefr Zakariya opposite,<br />
between which there is the broad deep valley called Wady Sumt, which is <strong>on</strong>ly<br />
twenty minutes in breadth ( Rob. ii. p. 350). This is the more probable as the Hebrew<br />
name is a dual. Adithaim is unknown. Gederah is possibly the same as the Gederoth<br />
which was taken by the Philistines in the time of Ahaz (2 Chr<strong>on</strong> 28:18), and the<br />
Gedrus of the Onom. ( s. v. Gaedur , or Gahedur ), ten Roman miles to the south of<br />
Diospolis, <strong>on</strong> the road to Eleutheropolis, as the Gederoth in v. 41 was in the actual<br />
plain, and therefore did not stand between Diospolis and Eleutheropolis.<br />
Gederothaim is supposed by Winer, Knobel , and others, to be an ancient gloss. This<br />
is possible no doubt, but it is not certain, as neither the omissi<strong>on</strong> of the name from the<br />
Sept. , nor the circumstance that the full number of towns is given as fourteen, and<br />
that this is not the number obtained if we reck<strong>on</strong> Gederothaim, can be adduced as a<br />
decisive proof, since this difference may have arisen in the same manner as the<br />
similar discrepancy in v. 32.<br />
Verse 37-41. The sec<strong>on</strong>d group, c<strong>on</strong>taining the towns of the actual plain in its full<br />
extent from north to south, between the hilly regi<strong>on</strong> and the line of coast held by the<br />
Philistines: sixteen towns in all.<br />
Verse 37. Zenan , probably the same as Zaanan (Mic 1:11), is supposed by Knobel to<br />
be the ruins of Chirbet-es-Senat , a short distance to the north of Beit-jibrin ( Tobler ,<br />
Dritte Wand. p. 124). Hadashah , according to the Mishnah Erub. v. vi. the smallest<br />
place in Judah, c<strong>on</strong>taining <strong>on</strong>ly fifty houses, is unknown, and a different place from<br />
the Adasa of 1 Macc. 7:40, 45, and Joseph. Ant. xii. 10, 5, as this was to the north of<br />
Jerusalem ( Onom. ) . - Migdal-gad is unknown. Knobel supposes it to be the small<br />
hill called Jedeideh , with ruins up<strong>on</strong> it, towards the north of Beit-jibrin ( V. de Velde<br />
, R. ii. pp. 162, 188).<br />
http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos97.html (2 of 3) [13/08/2004 01:18:41 p.m.]