22.08.2013 Views

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />

<br />

4:29. Knobel identifies it with the present Deir Belah , some hours to the south-west<br />

of Gaza Rob. iii. App.; Ritter , Erdk. xvi. pp. 41, 42); but it cannot have been so far to<br />

the west, or so near the coast as this. Iim (or Ivvim, according to the Auei'm of the<br />

LXX) is probably the ruins of Beit-auwa ( Rob. iii. App.). Azem , which was also<br />

given up to the Sime<strong>on</strong>ites (Josh 19:3; 1 Chr<strong>on</strong> 4:29), is supposed by Knobel to be<br />

Eboda , the present Abdeh , eight hours to the south of Elusa , a c<strong>on</strong>siderable mass of<br />

ruins <strong>on</strong> a ridge of rock ( Rob. i. p. 287), because the name signifies firmness or<br />

strength, which is also the meaning of the Arabic name-a very precarious reas<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Verse 30-31. Eltolad , which was given to the Sime<strong>on</strong>ites (Josh 19:4), and is called<br />

Tolad (without the Arabic article) in 1 Chr<strong>on</strong> 4:29, has not been discovered. Chesil ,<br />

for which the LXX have Baithee'l , is probably, as Reland supposes, simply another<br />

name, or as Knobel suggests a corrupt reading for, Bethul or Bethuel , which is<br />

menti<strong>on</strong>ed in Josh 19:4 and 1 Chr<strong>on</strong> 4:30, between Eltolad and Hormah , as a town<br />

of the Sime<strong>on</strong>ites, and the same place as Beth-el in 1 Sam 30:27. As this name points<br />

to the seat of some ancient sanctuary, and there was an idol called Khalasa<br />

worshipped by the Arabs before the time of Mohamet, and also because Jerome<br />

observes ( vita Hilar. c. 25) that there was a temple of Venus at Elusa , in which the<br />

Saracens worshipped Lucifer (see Tuch , Deutsch. Morgenl. Ztschr. iii. pp. 194ff.),<br />

Knobel supposes Bethul ( Chesil ) to be Elusa, a c<strong>on</strong>siderable collecti<strong>on</strong> of ruins five<br />

hours and a half to the south of Beersheba (see Rob. i. p. 296): assuming first of all<br />

that the name el Khulasa , as the Arabs called this place, was derived from the<br />

Mahometan idol already referred to; and sec<strong>on</strong>dly, that the Saracen Lucifer<br />

menti<strong>on</strong>ed by Jerome was the very same idol whose image and temple Janhari and<br />

Kamus call el Khalasa. Hormah: i.e., Zephoth , the present Sepata (see at Josh<br />

12:14).<br />

Ziklag , which was assigned to the Sime<strong>on</strong>ites (Josh 19:5; 1 Chr<strong>on</strong> 4:30), burnt down<br />

by the Amalekites (1 Sam 30:1ff.), and still inhabited after the captivity (Neh 11:28),<br />

is supposed by Rowland to be the ancient place called Asluj or Kasluj , a few hours to<br />

the east of Zepata, with which Knobel , however, in a most remarkable manner,<br />

http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos95.html (1 of 3) [13/08/2004 01:18:38 p.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!