Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox
Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox
Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />
<br />
Canaanites." If, however, we were disposed to adopt the opini<strong>on</strong> held by Masius and<br />
Rosenmüller , and understand these words as relating to the southern boundaries of<br />
Canaan, "the possessi<strong>on</strong>s of the king of Arad and the neighbouring petty kings who<br />
ruled in the southern extremity of Judaea down to the desert of Paran, Zin, Kadesh,"<br />
etc., the fact that Arad and the adjoining districts are always reck<strong>on</strong>ed as bel<strong>on</strong>ging to<br />
the Negeb would at <strong>on</strong>ce be decisive against it (compare Josh 15:21ff. with ch. 10:40;<br />
11:16, also Num 21:1).<br />
Moreover, according to Josh 10:40,21, and 11:16-17, <strong>Joshua</strong> had smitten the whole of<br />
the south of Canaan from Kadesh-barnea to Gaza and taken it; so that nothing<br />
remained unc<strong>on</strong>quered there, which could possibly have been menti<strong>on</strong>ed in this<br />
passage as not yet taken by the Israelites. For the fact that the districts, which <strong>Joshua</strong><br />
traversed so victoriously and took possessi<strong>on</strong> of, were not all permanently held by the<br />
Israelites, does not come into c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> here at all. If the author had thought of<br />
enumerating all these places, he would have had to include many other districts as<br />
well.<br />
Beside the territory of the Philistines <strong>on</strong> the south-west, there still remained to be<br />
taken (vv. 4, 5) in the north, "all the land of the Canaanites," i.e., of the Phoenicians<br />
dwelling <strong>on</strong> the coast, and "the caves which bel<strong>on</strong>ged to the Sid<strong>on</strong>ians unto Aphek."<br />
Mearah (the cave) is the present Mugr Jezzin , i.e., cave of Jezzin, <strong>on</strong> the east of<br />
Sid<strong>on</strong>, in a steep rocky wall of Leban<strong>on</strong>, a hiding-place of the Druses at the present<br />
time (see at Num 34:8; also<br />
F. v. Richter , Wallfahrten in Morgenland, p. 133). Aphek , or Aphik , was allotted to<br />
the tribe of Asher (Josh 19:30; Judg 1:31); it was called A'faka by the Greeks; there<br />
was a temple of Venus there, which C<strong>on</strong>stantine ordered to be destroyed, <strong>on</strong> account<br />
of the licentious nature of the worship ( Euseb. Vita C<strong>on</strong>st. iii. 55). It is the present<br />
Afka , a small village, but a place of rare beauty, up<strong>on</strong> a terrace of Leban<strong>on</strong>, near the<br />
chief source of the river Ad<strong>on</strong>is ( Nahr Ibrahim ), with ruins of an ancient temple in<br />
the neighbourhood, surrounded by groves of the most splendid walnut trees <strong>on</strong> the<br />
north-east of Beirut (see O. F. v. Richter , pp. 106-7; Rob. Bibl. Res. p. 663; and V. de<br />
Velde , Reise. ii. p. 398). "To the territory of the Amorites:" this is obscure. We<br />
http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos78.html (1 of 3) [13/08/2004 01:18:17 p.m.]