22.08.2013 Views

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />

<br />

Canaanites." If, however, we were disposed to adopt the opini<strong>on</strong> held by Masius and<br />

Rosenmüller , and understand these words as relating to the southern boundaries of<br />

Canaan, "the possessi<strong>on</strong>s of the king of Arad and the neighbouring petty kings who<br />

ruled in the southern extremity of Judaea down to the desert of Paran, Zin, Kadesh,"<br />

etc., the fact that Arad and the adjoining districts are always reck<strong>on</strong>ed as bel<strong>on</strong>ging to<br />

the Negeb would at <strong>on</strong>ce be decisive against it (compare Josh 15:21ff. with ch. 10:40;<br />

11:16, also Num 21:1).<br />

Moreover, according to Josh 10:40,21, and 11:16-17, <strong>Joshua</strong> had smitten the whole of<br />

the south of Canaan from Kadesh-barnea to Gaza and taken it; so that nothing<br />

remained unc<strong>on</strong>quered there, which could possibly have been menti<strong>on</strong>ed in this<br />

passage as not yet taken by the Israelites. For the fact that the districts, which <strong>Joshua</strong><br />

traversed so victoriously and took possessi<strong>on</strong> of, were not all permanently held by the<br />

Israelites, does not come into c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> here at all. If the author had thought of<br />

enumerating all these places, he would have had to include many other districts as<br />

well.<br />

Beside the territory of the Philistines <strong>on</strong> the south-west, there still remained to be<br />

taken (vv. 4, 5) in the north, "all the land of the Canaanites," i.e., of the Phoenicians<br />

dwelling <strong>on</strong> the coast, and "the caves which bel<strong>on</strong>ged to the Sid<strong>on</strong>ians unto Aphek."<br />

Mearah (the cave) is the present Mugr Jezzin , i.e., cave of Jezzin, <strong>on</strong> the east of<br />

Sid<strong>on</strong>, in a steep rocky wall of Leban<strong>on</strong>, a hiding-place of the Druses at the present<br />

time (see at Num 34:8; also<br />

F. v. Richter , Wallfahrten in Morgenland, p. 133). Aphek , or Aphik , was allotted to<br />

the tribe of Asher (Josh 19:30; Judg 1:31); it was called A'faka by the Greeks; there<br />

was a temple of Venus there, which C<strong>on</strong>stantine ordered to be destroyed, <strong>on</strong> account<br />

of the licentious nature of the worship ( Euseb. Vita C<strong>on</strong>st. iii. 55). It is the present<br />

Afka , a small village, but a place of rare beauty, up<strong>on</strong> a terrace of Leban<strong>on</strong>, near the<br />

chief source of the river Ad<strong>on</strong>is ( Nahr Ibrahim ), with ruins of an ancient temple in<br />

the neighbourhood, surrounded by groves of the most splendid walnut trees <strong>on</strong> the<br />

north-east of Beirut (see O. F. v. Richter , pp. 106-7; Rob. Bibl. Res. p. 663; and V. de<br />

Velde , Reise. ii. p. 398). "To the territory of the Amorites:" this is obscure. We<br />

http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos78.html (1 of 3) [13/08/2004 01:18:17 p.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!