22.08.2013 Views

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos76.html<br />

death; whereas he might very possibly suppose that, under existing circumstances, the<br />

time for allotting the land had not yet arrived. - In vv. 2-6 the districts that were not<br />

yet c<strong>on</strong>quered are enumerated separately.<br />

Verse 2-4. All the circles of the Philistines ( geliloth , circles of well-defined districts<br />

lying round the chief city). The reference is to the five towns of the Philistines, whose<br />

princes are menti<strong>on</strong>ed in v. 3. "And all Geshuri:" not the district of Geshur in Peraea<br />

(vv. 11, 13, Josh 12:5; Deut 3:14), but the territory of the Geshurites, a small tribe in<br />

the south of Philistia, <strong>on</strong> the edge of the north-western porti<strong>on</strong> of the Arabian desert<br />

which borders <strong>on</strong> Egypt; it is <strong>on</strong>ly menti<strong>on</strong>ed again in 1 Sam 27:8. The land of the<br />

Philistines and Geshurites extended from the Sichor of Egypt (<strong>on</strong> the south) to the<br />

territory of Ekr<strong>on</strong> (<strong>on</strong> the north). Sichor ( Sihor ), lit. the black river, is not the Nile,<br />

because this is always called hayª'or (OT:2975) (the river) in simple prose (Gen<br />

41:1,3; Ex 1:22), and was not "before Egypt," i.e., to the east of it, but flowed through<br />

the middle of the land.<br />

The "Sichor before Egypt" was the brook ( Nachal ) of Egypt, the Chinokorou'ra ,<br />

the modern Wady el Arish , which is menti<strong>on</strong>ed in Josh 15:4,47, etc., as the southern<br />

border of Canaan towards Egypt (see at Num 34:5). Ekr<strong>on</strong> ( Arrakoo'n , LXX), the<br />

most northerly of the five chief cities of the Philistines, was first of all allotted to the<br />

tribe of Judah (Josh 15:11,45), then <strong>on</strong> the further distributi<strong>on</strong> it was given to Dan<br />

(Dan 19:43 ); after <strong>Joshua</strong>'s death it was c<strong>on</strong>quered by Judah (Judg 1:18), though it<br />

was not permanently occupied. It is the present Akîr, a c<strong>on</strong>siderable village in the<br />

plain, two hours to the south-west of Ramlah, and <strong>on</strong> the east of Jamnia, without<br />

ruins of any antiquity, with the excepti<strong>on</strong> of two old wells walled round, which<br />

probably bel<strong>on</strong>g to the times of the Crusaders (see Rob. Pal. iii. p. 23). "To the<br />

Canaanites is reck<strong>on</strong>ed (the territory of the) five lords of the Philistines," i.e., it was<br />

reck<strong>on</strong>ed as bel<strong>on</strong>ging to the land of Canaan, and allotted to the Israelites like all the<br />

rest.<br />

This remark was necessary because the Philistines were not descendants of Canaan<br />

(see at Gen 10:14), but yet<br />

http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos76.html (2 of 3) [13/08/2004 01:18:14 p.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!