22.08.2013 Views

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />

<br />

nothing to preclude this suppositi<strong>on</strong> in the fact that several towns occur with different<br />

names, e.g., Beth-shemesh and Ir-shemesh (Josh 15:10; 19:41; 21:16), Madmannah<br />

and Beth-marcaboth, Sansanna and Hazar-susa (Josh 15:31; 19:5), Shilchim and<br />

Sharuchen (Josh 15:32; 19:6), Remeth and Jarmuth (ch. 19:21; 21:29), or in other<br />

smaller differences.<br />

For variati<strong>on</strong>s of this kind may be sufficiently explained from the fact that such<br />

places were known by two different names, which could be used promiscuously;<br />

whilst in other cases the difference in the name amounts to nothing more than a<br />

different mode of writing or pr<strong>on</strong>ouncing it: e.g., Kattah and Kartah (Josh 19:15;<br />

21:34), Eshtemoh and Eshtemoa (Josh 15:50; 21:14), Baalah and Balah (ch. 15:29;<br />

19:3); or simply in the c<strong>on</strong>tracti<strong>on</strong> of a composite name, such as Ramoth in Gilead for<br />

Ramoth-mizpeh (Josh 21:36; 13:26); Bealoth and Baalath-beer (Josh 15:24; 19:8),<br />

Lebaoth and Beth-lebaoth (Josh 15:32; 19:6), Hammath and Hammoth-dor (ch.<br />

19:35; 21:32).<br />

If the author, <strong>on</strong> the other hand, had drawn from later sources, or had simply given<br />

the results of later surveys, as Knobel supposes, there can be no doubt that much<br />

greater uniformity would be found in the different lists.<br />

(Note: The arguments employed by Knobel in support of his asserti<strong>on</strong>, c<strong>on</strong>sist <strong>on</strong> the <strong>on</strong>e had of<br />

inc<strong>on</strong>clusive and incorrect asserti<strong>on</strong>s, and are founded <strong>on</strong> the other hand up<strong>on</strong> arbitrary assumpti<strong>on</strong>s. In<br />

the first place, for example, he asserts that "a large number of towns are omitted from the lists, which<br />

were within the boundaries menti<strong>on</strong>ed and were in existence in the very earliest times, viz., in the south ,<br />

Tamar (Gen 14:7), Arad (Num 21:1), Atbach, Rachal, Aroer, and Siphamoth (1 Sam 30:28ff.), Gerar (<br />

Gen. 20:26<br />

); in the Shephelah , Gaza, Askal<strong>on</strong>, Gath, Ashdod, Jabne, and Joppa (see Josh 15:45ff.); in Benjamin ,<br />

Michmash and Nob (1 Sam 13:2ff., Josh 22:19); in the north , Aphek, Lassar<strong>on</strong>, Mad<strong>on</strong>, Shimr<strong>on</strong>-mer<strong>on</strong>,<br />

and Merom (Josh 11:5; 12:18-20), as well as Meroz and Ajjal<strong>on</strong> (Judg 5:23; 12:12); and these with other<br />

places would assuredly not be wanting here, if <strong>Joshua</strong> and his associates had distributed the towns as well<br />

as the land, and furnished our author with the lists."<br />

http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos75.html (1 of 3) [13/08/2004 01:18:13 p.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!