22.08.2013 Views

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />

the Canaanites of the south, so likewise in vv. 19 and 20 the capitals of the allied<br />

kings of northern Canaan are given first, and after that the other towns that were<br />

taken in the northern war, but had not been menti<strong>on</strong>ed by name in ch. 11: there can be<br />

no doubt whatever that the four towns in vv. 17 and 18 are to be classed am<strong>on</strong>g the<br />

kings'-towns taken in the war with the king of Jerusalem and his allies, and therefore<br />

are to be sought for in the south of Canaan and not in the north.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sequently we cannot agree with Van de Velde and Knobel in identifying<br />

Tappuach with En-Tappuach (Josh 17:7), and looking for it in Atûf , a place to the<br />

north-east of Nablus and near the valley of the Jordan; we c<strong>on</strong>nect it rather with<br />

Tappuach in the lowlands of Judah (Josh 15:34), though the place itself has not yet<br />

been discovered. Hefer again is neither to be identified with Gath-hepher in the tribe<br />

of Zebulun (Josh 19:13), nor with Chafaraim in the tribe of Issachar (ch. 19:19), but<br />

is most probably the capital of the land of Hefer (1 Kings 4:10), and to be sought for<br />

in the neighbourhood of Socoh in the plain of Judah. Aphek is probably the town of<br />

that name not far from Ebenezer (1 Sam 4:1), where the ark was taken by the<br />

Philistines, and is most likely to be sought for in the plain of Judah, though not in the<br />

village of Ahbek ( Rob. Pal. ii. p. 343); but it has not yet been traced. Knobel<br />

imagines that it was Aphek near to Jezreel (1 Sam 29:1), which was situated,<br />

according to the Onom. , in the neighbourhood of Endor (1 Sam 29:1; 1 Kings<br />

20:25,30); but this Aphek is too far north. Lassar<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly occurs here, and hitherto it<br />

has been impossible to trace it. Knobel supposes it to be the place called Saruneh , to<br />

the west of the lake of Tiberias, and c<strong>on</strong>jectures that the name has been c<strong>on</strong>tracted<br />

from Lassar<strong>on</strong> by aphaeresis of the liquid. This is quite possible, if <strong>on</strong>ly we could<br />

look for Lassar<strong>on</strong> so far to the north. Bachienne and Rosenmüller imagine it to be the<br />

village of Shar<strong>on</strong> in the celebrated plain of that name, between Lydda and Arsuf.<br />

<strong>Joshua</strong> 12:19-20<br />

<br />

http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos72.html (2 of 2) [13/08/2004 01:18:09 p.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!