22.08.2013 Views

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />

<strong>on</strong> the <strong>on</strong>e hand, and the rest of Israel, in which the double tribe of Joseph and then the single tribe of<br />

Ephraim acquired such peculiar prominence, <strong>on</strong> the other, shape itself more and more in the mind, and<br />

what already existed in the germ begin to attain maturity even here? And what could be more natural than<br />

that the mountains in which the "children of Judah" had their settlements should be called the mountains<br />

of Judah; and the mountains where all the rest of Israel was encamped, where the "children of Israel"<br />

were gathered together, be called the mountains of Israel , and, as that particular district really bel<strong>on</strong>ged<br />

to the tribe of Ephraim, the mountains of Ephraim also? (Josh 19:50; 20:7; also 24:30.))<br />

Gaza, Gath, and Ashdod were towns of the Philistines; of these Gaza and Ashdod<br />

were allotted to the tribe of Judah (Josh 15:47), but were never taken possessi<strong>on</strong> of by<br />

the Israelites, although the Philistines were sometimes subject to the Israelites (see at<br />

Josh 13:3). - With v. 23a, "thus <strong>Joshua</strong> took the whole land" etc., the history of the<br />

c<strong>on</strong>quest of Canaan by <strong>Joshua</strong> is brought to a close; and v. 23b, "and <strong>Joshua</strong> gave it<br />

for an inheritance unto Israel," forms a kind of introducti<strong>on</strong> to the sec<strong>on</strong>d part of the<br />

book. The list of the c<strong>on</strong>quered kings in ch. 12 is simply an appendix to the first part.<br />

The taking of the whole land does not imply that all the towns and villages to the very<br />

last had been c<strong>on</strong>quered, or that all the Canaanites were rooted out from every corner<br />

of the land, but simply that the c<strong>on</strong>quest was of such a character that the power of the<br />

Canaanites was broken, their domini<strong>on</strong> overthrown, and their whole land so<br />

thoroughly given into the hands of the Israelites, that those who still remained here<br />

and there were crushed into powerless fugitives, who could neither offer any further<br />

oppositi<strong>on</strong> to the Israelites, nor dispute the possessi<strong>on</strong> of the land with them, if they<br />

would <strong>on</strong>ly strive to fulfil the commandments of their God and persevere in the<br />

gradual exterminati<strong>on</strong> of the scattered remnants. Moreover, Israel had received the<br />

str<strong>on</strong>gest pledge, in the powerful help<br />

<br />

http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos69.html (2 of 2) [13/08/2004 01:18:06 p.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!