22.08.2013 Views

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />

<br />

by the name of Ain Nunkûr , - is also quite untenable; for it is entirely at variance with Josh 15:49,<br />

according to which Debir was not <strong>on</strong> the west of Hebr<strong>on</strong>, but up<strong>on</strong> the mountains to the south, and rests<br />

entirely up<strong>on</strong> the err<strong>on</strong>eous assumpti<strong>on</strong> that, according to v. 38 ( wayaashaab (OT:7725), he turned<br />

round), as <strong>Joshua</strong> came from Egl<strong>on</strong>, he c<strong>on</strong>quered Hebr<strong>on</strong> first, and after the c<strong>on</strong>quest of this town turned<br />

back to Debir, to take it also. But shuwb (OT:7725), does not mean <strong>on</strong>ly to turn round or turn back: it<br />

signifies turning generally; and it is very evident that this is the sense in which it is used in v. 38, since,<br />

according to Josh 15:49, Debir was <strong>on</strong> the south of Hebr<strong>on</strong>.)<br />

Moreover, not very l<strong>on</strong>g afterwards, probably during the time when the Israelites<br />

were occupied with the subjugati<strong>on</strong> of northern Canaan, Hebr<strong>on</strong> and Debir were<br />

taken again by the Canaanites, particularly the Anakites, as <strong>Joshua</strong> had not entirely<br />

destroyed them, although he had thoroughly cleared the mountains of Judah of them,<br />

but had left them still in the towns of the Philistines (Josh 11:21-22). C<strong>on</strong>sequently,<br />

when the land was divided, there were Anakites living in both Hebr<strong>on</strong> and Debir; so<br />

that Caleb, to whom these towns were given as his inheritance, had first of all to<br />

c<strong>on</strong>quer them again, and to exterminate the Anakites (Josh 14:12; 15:13-17: cf. Judg<br />

1:10-13).<br />

(Note: By this simple assumpti<strong>on</strong> we get rid of the pretended c<strong>on</strong>tradicti<strong>on</strong>s, which neological critics have<br />

discovered between Josh 10:36-39 <strong>on</strong> the <strong>on</strong>e hand, and ch. 11:21-22, and 14:12; 15:13-17 <strong>on</strong> the other,<br />

and <strong>on</strong> account of which Knobel would assign the passages last named to a different document. On the<br />

first c<strong>on</strong>quest of the land by <strong>Joshua</strong>, Masius observes that "in this expediti<strong>on</strong> <strong>Joshua</strong> ran through the<br />

southern regi<strong>on</strong> with an armed band, in too hurried a manner to depopulate it entirely. All that he needed<br />

was to strike such terror into the hearts of all through his victories, that no <strong>on</strong>e should henceforth offer<br />

any resistance to himself and to the people of God. Those whom he pursued, therefore, he destroyed<br />

according to the commands of God, not sparing a single <strong>on</strong>e, but he did not search out every possible<br />

hiding-place in which any could be c<strong>on</strong>cealed. This was left as a gleaning to the valour of each particular<br />

tribe, when it should take possessi<strong>on</strong> of its own inheritance.")<br />

<strong>Joshua</strong> 10:40-41<br />

So <strong>Joshua</strong> smote all the country of the hills, and of the south, and of the vale, and<br />

of the springs, and all their kings: he left n<strong>on</strong>e remaining, but utterly destroyed all<br />

http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos64.html (1 of 2) [13/08/2004 01:17:58 p.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!