22.08.2013 Views

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />

achievements interwoven, and that the collecti<strong>on</strong> was formed by degrees; so that the<br />

reference to this work is neither a proof that the passage has been interpolated by a<br />

later hand, nor that the work was composed at a very late period. That the passage<br />

quoted from this work is extracted from a s<strong>on</strong>g is evident enough, both from the<br />

poetical form of the compositi<strong>on</strong>, and also from the parallelism of the sentences. The<br />

quotati<strong>on</strong>, however, does not begin with wayo'mer (OT:559) ( and he said ) in v. 12b,<br />

but with teet (OT:5414) bªyowm (OT:3117) ( in the day when the Lord delivered ) in<br />

v. 12a, and vv. 13 and 14 also form part of it; so that the title of the book from which<br />

the quotati<strong>on</strong> is taken is inserted in the middle of the quotati<strong>on</strong> itself.<br />

In other cases, unquesti<strong>on</strong>ably, such formulas of quotati<strong>on</strong> are placed either at the<br />

beginning (as in Num 21:14,27; 2 Sam 1:18), or else at the close of the account,<br />

which is frequently the case in the books of Kings and Chr<strong>on</strong>icles; but it by no means<br />

follows that there were no excepti<strong>on</strong>s to this rule, especially as the reas<strong>on</strong> for<br />

menti<strong>on</strong>ing the original sources is a totally different <strong>on</strong>e in the books of Kings, where<br />

the works cited are not the simple vouchers for the facts related, but works c<strong>on</strong>taining<br />

fuller and more elaborate accounts of events which have <strong>on</strong>ly been cursorily<br />

described. The poetical form of the passage in v. 13 also leaves no doubt whatever<br />

that<br />

vv. 13 and 14 c<strong>on</strong>tain the words of the old poet, and are not a prose comment made<br />

by the historian up<strong>on</strong> the poetical passage quoted. The <strong>on</strong>ly purely historical<br />

statement in v. 15; and this is repeated in v. 43, at the close of the account of the wars<br />

and the victory. But this literal repetiti<strong>on</strong> of v. 15 in v. 43, and the fact that the<br />

statement, that <strong>Joshua</strong> returned with all the people to the camp at Gilgal, anticipates<br />

the historical course of the events in a very remarkable manner, render it highly<br />

probable, it not absolutely certain, that v. 15 was also taken from the book of the<br />

righteous.<br />

In the day when Jehovah delivered up the Amorites to the children of Israel ("before,"<br />

as in Deut 2:31,33, etc.),<br />

<br />

http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos57.html (2 of 2) [13/08/2004 01:17:48 p.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!