Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox
Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox
Commentary on Joshua - Keil & Delitzsch - David Cox
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Keil</strong> and <strong>Delitzsch</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commentary</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the Old Testament<br />
<br />
towards the east, and far away in the north-east even Herm<strong>on</strong> itself ( Rob. Pal. iii. p.<br />
81), was peculiarly well adapted for a place of encampment, from which <strong>Joshua</strong><br />
could carry <strong>on</strong> the c<strong>on</strong>quest of the land toward both the north and south, we can come<br />
to no other c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> than that this Gilgal or Jiljilia was the Gilgal menti<strong>on</strong>ed in<br />
Josh 9:6; 10:6,9,15,43, and 14:6, as the place where the Israelites were encamped.<br />
We therefore assume, that after the setting up of the law <strong>on</strong> Gerizim and Ebal, <strong>Joshua</strong><br />
did not c<strong>on</strong>duct the people with their wives and children back again to the camp<br />
which they had left in the Jordan valley <strong>on</strong> the other side of Jericho, but chose the<br />
Gilgal which was situated up<strong>on</strong> the mountains, and <strong>on</strong>ly seven hours' journey to the<br />
south of Sichem, as the future place of encampment, and made this the central point<br />
of all his further military operati<strong>on</strong>s; and that this was the place to which he returned<br />
after his last campaign in the north, to commence the divisi<strong>on</strong> of the c<strong>on</strong>quered land<br />
am<strong>on</strong>g the tribes of Israel (Josh 14:6), and where he remained till the tabernacle was<br />
permanently erected at Shiloh, when the further distributi<strong>on</strong> was carried <strong>on</strong> there<br />
(Josh 18:1ff.). This view, which even Van de Velde (Memoir, p. 316) has adopted as<br />
probable, is favoured still further by the fact that this Gilgal of Jiljilia, which is still a<br />
large village, is frequently menti<strong>on</strong>ed in the subsequent history of Israel, not <strong>on</strong>ly in 2<br />
Kings 2:1 and 4:38, as the seat of a school of the prophets in the time of Elijah and<br />
Elisha, and in Hos 4:15; 9:15; 12:12; Amos 4:4; 5:5, as a place which was much<br />
frequented for the purpose of idolatrous worship; but even at an earlier date still,<br />
namely, as <strong>on</strong>e of the places where Samuel judged the people (1 Sam 7:16), and as<br />
the place where he offered sacrifice (1 Sam 10:8; cf. Josh 13:7-9), and where he<br />
gathered the people together to c<strong>on</strong>firm the m<strong>on</strong>archy of Saul (1 Sam 11:14-15), at a<br />
time when the tabernacle at Shiloh had ceased to be the <strong>on</strong>ly nati<strong>on</strong>al sanctuary of<br />
Israel, <strong>on</strong> account of the ark having been taken away. Gilgal had no doubt acquired<br />
this significance al<strong>on</strong>g with Bethel, which had been regarded as a holy place ever<br />
since the time of Jacob, from the fact that it was there that <strong>Joshua</strong> had established the<br />
camp of Israel with the ark of the covenant, until the land was divided, and Shiloh<br />
was appointed as the site for the nati<strong>on</strong>al sanctuary.<br />
Stratagem of the Gibe<strong>on</strong>ites, and Their C<strong>on</strong>sequent Preservati<strong>on</strong>. Ch. 9.<br />
http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/josh/jos47.html (1 of 2) [13/08/2004 01:17:37 p.m.]