Guerra 1 - California State University, Sacramento
Guerra 1 - California State University, Sacramento
Guerra 1 - California State University, Sacramento
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Guerra</strong> 1<br />
"Rauschenberg was the man who in this century invented the most since Picasso," Jasper<br />
Johns told the Village Voice about his longtime friend and seven-year lover Robert Rauschenberg. 1<br />
This incredibly profound compliment is evidence of the deep respect Johns had for Rauschenberg<br />
and his work, but the respect was definitely mutual. Johns and Rauschenberg, who have been<br />
recognized at different times as being associated with Pop Art, with Neo-Dada, or Abstract<br />
Expressionism; the consensus remains, however, that both together are “jointly responsible…for a<br />
historic shift in the ambitions of art.” 2 Some art historians would go as far as to say that, although<br />
“artistic movements generally involve more than two artists, theirs was confined to them alone.” 3<br />
The “historic shift” they created had everything to do with Johns and Rauschenberg’s unique<br />
relationship, which was indisputably influenced by their connection to Abstract Expressionism and<br />
the tension that connection generated. This paper will explore their relationship, from the year they<br />
met in New York, following their exploration of Abstract Expressionist ideas, their joint-<br />
development of new ideas, the importance of homosexuality in their art, and the culmination of all<br />
of this into some of the most important art American history has seen.<br />
Jasper Johns (American, born 1930) and Robert Rauschenberg (American 1925-2008), met<br />
in the winter of 1953 while both artists were living in New York. Johns was visiting Black<br />
Mountain College, a progressive college in North Carolina that saw art as central to a liberal arts<br />
education, where he was introduced to Robert Rauschenberg through a mutual friend, Suzi Gablik.<br />
They met again later on at an artists party, where they “struck up a friendship.” 4 Johns had moved<br />
1<br />
Jerry Saltz, "Our Picasso?" Village Voice, 3 January 2006.<br />
.<br />
2<br />
John Russell, "Art View; Rauschenberg and Johns: Mr. Outisde and Mr. Inside," New York Times,<br />
15 February 1987.<br />
3<br />
Jonathan Katz, “The Art of Code: Jasper Johns and Robert Rauschenberg,” in Whitney Chadwick,<br />
Significant Others: Creativity and Intimate Partnership, 189.<br />
4<br />
Katz in Chadwick, 191-2.
<strong>Guerra</strong> 2<br />
to New York in 1949 in order to attend commercial art school. He was drafted into the military in<br />
1950 and returned to New York in 1952. During the time that he met Rauschenberg, Johns had<br />
been working at Marboro bookstore and dabbling in painting, but he was unsure whether or not he<br />
wanted to become an artist. 5 By 1953, Rauschenberg was already somewhat established as an<br />
artist. As a member of the Abstract Expressionists’ circle, he had already shown in a few shows on<br />
invitation of the Abstract Expressionists and individually in prestigious avant-garde galleries as<br />
well. 6 He saw immense potential in Johns’ artwork and eventually convinced him to quit his job at<br />
the bookstore to pursue his art more seriously. They worked together designing window displays<br />
for department stores for extra cash and, after some vigorous encouragement by Rauschenberg,<br />
Johns moved into the same building in 1954. 7 It was in this building that Leo Castelli<br />
(Rauschenberg’s dealer) would discover Johns’ work and throw Johns into the spotlight. 8<br />
Perhaps the most prevalent factor in making the relationship between Johns and<br />
Rauschenberg so influential was the particular tension that surrounded male-male relationships of<br />
the time, especially within the Abstract Expressionist circle. In her essay, "Finishing School: John<br />
Cage and the Abstract Expressionist Ego," Caroline Jones sums up the Abstract Expressionist<br />
sentiment quintessentially:<br />
Briefly put, the subjectivity of the New York school abstract expressionist was<br />
constructed in the American culture of the late 1940s and early 1950s as that of an<br />
isolated, autochthonic, angst-ridden male genius, alternating between bouts of<br />
melancholic depression and volcanic creativity. 9<br />
5<br />
Jill Johnston, Jasper Johns: Privileged Information, New York: Thames and Hudson, (1996): 176.<br />
6<br />
Katz in Chadwick, 191.<br />
7<br />
Johnston, 129.<br />
8<br />
Louis Castelli, Jasper Johns: 35 years [with] Leo Castelli. New York: Leo Castelli Gallery,<br />
1993,163.<br />
9<br />
Caroline A. Jones, "Finishing School: John Cage and the Abstract Expressionist Ego," Critical<br />
Inquiry 19, 4 (1993): 639.
For both men, the nature of their sexuality acted as a unique obstacle to their art. For<br />
<strong>Guerra</strong> 3<br />
Rauschenberg, the Abstract Expressionist circle provided an environment that was hostile to the<br />
idea of homosexuality. In a world where art was already not seen as the epitome of masculinity,<br />
many of the Abstract Expressionists felt that their masculinity was in particular need of defending.<br />
The idea of homosexuality was positively unwelcome. In addition, the promotion of individual<br />
truth and authenticity that was held so valuable among the Abstract Expressionists acted as a<br />
challenge to confront the artist’s inner self and present it on the canvas. However, “the intense<br />
male-bonding of this almost exclusively masculine art world, coupled with its generalized anxiety<br />
over the very act of art-making, created an atmosphere in which the merest suggestion of<br />
homosexuality was opposed.” 10<br />
Johns felt the pressure of this homophobic environment as well. At the time he met<br />
Rauschenberg, Johns had been living with a good friend of burgeoning New York artists and<br />
faithful patron of both Rauschenberg and Johns, Rachel Rosenthal. Much the more reserved,<br />
introverted individual, Johns had more trouble coming to terms with his sexuality than<br />
Rauschenberg. According to Rosenthal, at an artists party both attended, Johns “‘kind of threw<br />
himself on [her],’” who would act as a “kind of Xenia role to Johns during Rauschenberg’s<br />
courtship of him.” 11 Rosenthal’s idea was that he was “‘trying to avoid a relationship with Bob, not<br />
because he wasn’t attracted to Bob, but because of the stigma, and the fact that in those days it was<br />
a real problem.’” 12 This tension, coupled with Rauschenberg and Johns’ mutual awareness of the<br />
hostility, actually threw them together more profoundly. It isolated them from a community that<br />
would not have accepted their “individual truths,” and forced them to look for new ways of thinking<br />
10 Katz in Chadwick, 193.<br />
11 Johnston, 128.<br />
12 Johnston, 128.
<strong>Guerra</strong> 4<br />
about art. Johns remarked, “‘Our world was very limited. I think we were very dependent on one<br />
another. There was that business of triggering energies, other people fed into that, but it was<br />
basically a two way operation.’” 13 Together they started a new life, a separate circle in which, as<br />
Rauschenberg put it, “‘Jasper and I used to start each day by [moving] out from Abstract<br />
Expressionism.’” 14<br />
The methods in which both artists moved out from Abstract Expressionism were deeply<br />
entwined. Rauschenberg’s ideas about the role of the artist were obvious. “‘I don’t want my<br />
personality to come out through the pieces,’” he said. “‘That’s why I keep the TV on all the<br />
time….And I keep the windows open. I want my paintings to be reflections of life,’” whereas<br />
Johns had said, “‘In my early work I tried to hide my personality, my psychological state, my<br />
emotions. This was partly to do with<br />
feelings about painting at the time.’” 15<br />
These “feelings” had everything to do<br />
with the unique situation these two artists<br />
had found themselves in. Much of<br />
Rauschenberg’s earlier work reflected the<br />
painterly drips and gestural strokes of the<br />
Abstract Expressionists’ individualism.<br />
1) Robert Rauschenberg, White Painting [seven panel], 1951. Oil on<br />
canvas, 72 x 125 x 1 1/2 inches. Guggenheim Museum, New York, New<br />
York.<br />
However, in the early 1950s, he began to employ media that showed “a restless, reactive, inventive,<br />
and autonomous personality.” 16 He began to explore the possibility that art was not always about<br />
the individual feelings of the painter, but about what the viewer might bring to the piece. His series<br />
13 Katz in Chadwick, 200.<br />
14 Ibid., 197.<br />
15 Johnston, 136.<br />
16 Johnston., 134.
2) Jasper Johns. Target with Plaster Casts, 1955.<br />
Encaustic and collage on canvas with objects. 129.5 x<br />
111.8 cm (51 x 44 in) Collection Mr. and Mrs. Leo<br />
Castelli.<br />
<strong>Guerra</strong> 5<br />
White Paintings (1951) [Figure 1], which consisted of seven white canvases painted flat white (no<br />
gestural strokes, no texture), was indicative of these feelings of silence of the artist, a reaction to the<br />
Abstract Expressionist movement, and the beginning of the idea he would explore most with Jasper<br />
Johns through the use of culturally familiar imagery in order to involve the viewer.<br />
Johns’ work explored this idea of silence as well. Beginning with his solemn, “silent” works<br />
such as Target with Plaster Casts (1955) [Figure 2], Johns presents work that is laboriously<br />
works, essentially, are about silence.<br />
manifested in encaustic, a temperamental mix of pigment<br />
suspended in beeswax. The composition consists of<br />
fragmented pieces of a plaster-cast male body enclosed in<br />
compartments above an encaustic target. Johns describes<br />
the painting in a sketchbook as “an object that tells of the<br />
loss, destructions, disappearance of objects. Does not<br />
speak of itself. Tells of others.” 17 This passage sums up<br />
the essence of the work perfectly. Target is in opposition<br />
to the idea of personal revelation through painting, and in<br />
the same spirit as Rauschenberg’s White Paintings. Both<br />
On top of this reaction to the soul-bearing individualism of Abstract Expressionism, both<br />
Rauschenberg and Johns move into a humorous parody of Abstract Expressionist style. Together<br />
they explored methods of creating seemingly original, expressionist works in styles that make the<br />
17 Jasper Johns [undated sketchbook] published in Jasper Johns, Ed. Alan R. Solomon, Jewish<br />
Museum, New York, 1964.
perceived sincerity practically impossible. The exploration of this idea is evident in<br />
Rauschenberg’s Factum I and Factum II<br />
(1957) [Figure 3], and Johns’ False Start<br />
(1959) [Figure 4]. In Rauschenberg’s Factum<br />
I and Factum II (1957), this fabricated sincerity<br />
is executed in the duplication of strokes and<br />
gestures, making their spontaneity obviously<br />
impossible. 18 The same sort of impossible<br />
sincerity is evident in Johns’ False Start<br />
(1959), an “Abstract Expressionist color field<br />
4) Jasper Johns, False Start, 1959. Oil on<br />
canvas170.8 x 137.2 cm (67 1/4 x 54 in.)<br />
Private collection, New York.<br />
<strong>Guerra</strong> 6<br />
3) Robert Rauschenberg, Factum I and Factum II, 1957. Combine<br />
paintings. 155.9 x 90.2 cm (61 3/8 x 35 1/2 in.). Museum of Modern Art,<br />
New York.<br />
labeled with unmatched color names.” 19 The field itself is seemingly expressionist and spur-of-the-<br />
moment, but the carefully stenciled words, discordant to their<br />
respective colors, mock “emotional authenticity,” and create “an<br />
Abstract Expressionist picture that is manifestly untrue.” 20 The<br />
almost camp-like humor of this brave confrontation of Abstract<br />
Expressionism is highly Rauschenberg, the older artist being the<br />
more outgoing, humorous individual. Rauschenberg and Johns,<br />
having “moved out of Abstract Expressionism” together, began<br />
their departure with a rejection of the representation of the artist’s<br />
18 Barbara Rose, “Pop Art at the Guggenheim,” in Steven H. Madoff, Pop Art: A Critical History,<br />
83.<br />
19 Katz in Chadwick, 204.<br />
20 Ibid.
5) Robert Rauschenberg. Bed.<br />
1955. Oil, pencil on pillow, quilt,<br />
sheet on wood supports, 6' 3 1/4 x<br />
31 1/2 x 8 in. MoMa New York<br />
<strong>Guerra</strong> 7<br />
“inner truth” and continued it with a good-natured mockery of content and parody of style.<br />
The two not only parodied Abstract Expressionism aesthetically, but they also used it as a<br />
means to explore the concept of homosexuality. This topic, rendered in a<br />
mockery of Abstract Expressionist style as well, was an example of how<br />
Johns and Rauschenberg (according to Rauschenberg), “‘gave each other<br />
permission,’” both artistically as well as sexually. Rauschenberg’s Bed<br />
(1955) [Figure 5] has been connected with sexuality in that it is a<br />
reconfiguration of the Abstract Expressionist linking of aesthetics and<br />
sexual politics. Reviews of Bed “claimed that the piece resembled nothing<br />
so much as the sight of a rape, or maybe even a murder.” 21 Johns’ Painting<br />
with Two Balls (1960) [Figure 6], is a little more overt in its assertion of<br />
homoeroticism. The “two balls” of the title refer to actual wooden balls<br />
inserted into the structure of the piece and recall the essence of<br />
maleness. The piece is painted in Abstract Expressionist gestures,<br />
as if directly confronting the Abstract Expressionist hostility toward<br />
homosexuality. 22 Johns’ works of this time are much more vocal<br />
than his earlier work. We begin to see him adopt more<br />
“Rauschenberg ways of doing things” as their relationship<br />
21 Katz in Chadwick, 205.<br />
22 Ibid,, 203.<br />
6) Jasper Johns. Painting with Two<br />
Balls,1960. Encaustic and collage on canvas<br />
with objects 65 x 54 in. Collection of the<br />
artist.
<strong>Guerra</strong> 8<br />
progresses. 23 With its purposefully weak attempts at mimicking Abstract Expressionist brush-<br />
strokes as well as its desecration of the integrity of the field (the title is scrawled across the front of<br />
the work), Painting with Two Balls is what John Loughery in the Hudson Review calls “good old-<br />
fashioned sass.” 24<br />
Arguably the most influential works of Rauschenberg and Johns, however, were the works<br />
that ultimately influenced Pop Art through the use of culturally familiar media. These works<br />
(Rauschenberg’s Combines, specifically Untitled (1955) [Figure 7] and Johns Flag (1954-55)<br />
[Figure 8]) are truly the culmination of the artists’ shared ideas about the silence of the artist, the<br />
reactions to Abstract Expressionism, and the handling of political sexualized imagery.<br />
Rauschenberg’s Combines are perhaps some of his best-known works, and the time in which he<br />
was making them correlates to the time he was in a relationship with Johns. They were ultimately<br />
about what the viewer can bring to the piece, and Rauschenberg dedicated his first combine to<br />
Johns, perhaps as “a sign of his determining role in its development.” 25 One Combine in particular,<br />
Untitled (1955) is unmistakably soaked in Johns. It<br />
not only contains a photograph of Johns that<br />
Rauschenberg referred to as “gorgeous,” but also torn<br />
up letters from Johns, as well as a small drawing of an<br />
American flag – an homage to Johns’ art. 26 Beyond<br />
23 Roberta Bernstein, Jasper Johns' Paintings and Sculptures, 1954–1974: The Changing Focus of the Eye,<br />
Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press, 1985: 141.<br />
24<br />
John Loughery, "Bits and Pieces," The Hudson Review<br />
50, 1 (1997): 116.<br />
25<br />
Katz in Chadwick, 199.<br />
26<br />
Ibid., 201.<br />
7) Robert Rauschenberg. Untitled, 1955. Combine painting.<br />
15 1/2 x 20 3/4 in. Jasper Johns Collection.
<strong>Guerra</strong> 9<br />
the somewhat intimate content of the piece, it also encompasses the idea of using culturally familiar<br />
objects such as post-cards, printed-paper (which would have been available to any and everyone),<br />
as well as text. Rauschenberg’s combines “are an accurate reflection of the historical situation of a<br />
society everywhere totalized by the forces of commodification and mass media.” 27 This appeal to<br />
the role of the viewer is mirrored in Johns’ Flag<br />
(1955), done the same year. The subject of the<br />
painting seems to be the American flag, however,<br />
the true subject is the neutrality of the object. A<br />
flag was “nobody’s preference; not even his<br />
own.” 28 The fact that the subject is familiar makes<br />
the viewer an active participant in the artwork – a<br />
very Johns-Rauschenberg concept. In addition,<br />
Flag is painted over scraps of newspaper and other pieces of print, so that one can almost read<br />
them. Yet another example of familiarized objects.<br />
8) Jasper Johns, Flag, 1954-55. Encaustic, oil and collage on fabric<br />
mounted on plywood. 42 x 60 5/8 in. Gift of Philip Johnson in honor of<br />
Alfred H. Barr, Jr., Museum of Modern Art, New York.<br />
Rauschenberg and Johns’ mutual influence on each other is undeniably apparent in the work<br />
they produced during the time they were together, however, this influence continued long after they<br />
split up in 1961. The break-up devastated both artists. It was so painful, in fact, that the artists<br />
severed all contact for some time. Johns returned to his native South Carolina and retracted into the<br />
27 Branden W. Joseph, "Random Order: Robert Rauschenberg and the Neo-Avant-Garde,"<br />
Modernism/Modernity 12, 2 (2005): 168.<br />
28 Leo Steinberg, Jasper Johns. New York: George Wittenborn, 1963: 8.
<strong>Guerra</strong> 10<br />
“highly coded and idiosyncratic imagery” of his earlier work. 29 He created images that spoke of the<br />
break-up, including In Memory of My Feelings – Frank O’Hara (1961) [Figure 9], in which he<br />
echoes earlier work about silence and<br />
concealment by painting an envelope shut. 30<br />
The painting even aesthetically suggests the<br />
work he did during his relationship with<br />
Rauschenberg; its shape quite resembles a flag.<br />
Rauschenberg, on his part, created a combine<br />
entitled Slow or South Carolina Fall (1961)<br />
[Figure 10], the title, of course, alluding to<br />
9) Jasper Johns, In Memory of my Feelings – Frank O’hara, 1961,<br />
Oil on canvas with objects. 40-1/4 x 60 x 2-7/8 in. (102.2 x 152.4 x<br />
7.3 cm). Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago.<br />
Johns’ home state to which he had returned. Besides creating cathartic works, however, both artists<br />
began to explore each other’s favorite elements, as if the distance allowed them to toy with each<br />
other’s ideas and styles. Rauschenberg left his characteristic style of using found objects and<br />
elaborate assemblage to explore the two dimensional medium of silkscreen while Johns began to<br />
create larger, more eclectic works consisting of painting as well as collage and assemblage with<br />
found objects. 31<br />
It is impossible to deny the deep connection Jasper Johns and Robert Rauschenberg had<br />
together and the mutual influence they had on each other. They not only admired each other as<br />
fellow artists, but also lovingly as human beings. Rauschenberg was once said, “I have photos of<br />
29 Seth McCormick, "In Memory of My Feelings: Jasper Johns, Psychoanalysis, and the Expressive<br />
Gesture," Source 27, 2/3 (2008): 89.<br />
30 Frank O’Hara was the author of a poem called “In Memory of My Feelings,” a poem about gay<br />
love.<br />
31 Katz in Chadwick, 206.
<strong>Guerra</strong> 11<br />
him that would break your heart. Jasper was soft, beautiful, lean, and poetic. He looked almost<br />
ill.” 32 The tenderness they felt for each other and each other’s work came through in their own<br />
work, as well as the ways in which they have spoken of each other. Both artists created within the<br />
time they knew each other arguably their best work to date, and the influence of Abstract<br />
Expressionism in creating the time of crisis and environment of tension that encouraged their<br />
exploration of new ideas is glaringly apparent. As gay artists in the 1950s, Rauschenberg and<br />
Johns were extremely fortunate to find in each other lovers, mentors, fellow artists with which to<br />
share ideas, and most importantly, “some semblance of the kind of community that the Abstract<br />
Expressionists took for granted.” 33 Indeed, Robert Rauschenberg and Jasper Johns’ relationship<br />
was unique and influential, not only on each other, but on the art world as a whole.<br />
32 Johnston, 128.<br />
33 Katz in Chadwick, 196.
Bibliography<br />
<strong>Guerra</strong> 12<br />
Bernstein, Roberta. Jasper Johns' Paintings and Sculptures, 1954–1974: The Changing Focus<br />
of the Eye. Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press, 1985.<br />
Castelli, Leo. Jasper Johns: 35 years [with] Leo Castelli. New York: Leo Castelli Gallery,<br />
1993.<br />
Chadwick, Whitney and Isabelle de Courtivron, ed. Significant Others: Creativity and Intimate<br />
Partnership. New York: Thames and Hudson, 1996.<br />
Jasper Johns, ed. Alan R. Solomon, Jewish Museum, New York, 1964.<br />
Johnston, Jill. Jasper Johns: Privileged Information. New York: Thames and Hudson, 1996.<br />
Jones, Caroline A. "Finishing School: John Cage and the Abstract Expressionist Ego." Critical<br />
Inquiry 19, 4 (1993): 628-665.<br />
Joseph, Branden W. "Random Order: Robert Rauschenberg and the Neo-Avant-Garde."<br />
Modernism/Modernity 12, 2 (2005): 360-362.<br />
Kachurin, Pamela. "The ROCI Road to Peace: Robert Rauschenberg, Perestroika, and the End of<br />
the Cold War." Journal of Cold War Studies 4, 1 (2002): 27-43.<br />
Katz, Johnathan. “Lovers and Divers: Interpictorial Dialogue in the work of Robert<br />
Rauschenberg and Jasper Johns.”<br />
.<br />
Loughery, John. "Bits and Pieces." The Hudson Review 50, 1 (1997): 115-121.<br />
Madoff, Steven H. Pop Art: A Critical History. Berkeley: <strong>University</strong> of <strong>California</strong> Press, 1997.<br />
McCormick, Seth. "In Memory of My Feelings: Jasper Johns, Psychoanalysis, and the<br />
Expressive Gesture." Source 27, 2/3 (2008): 82-9.<br />
Russell, John. "Art View; Rauschenberg and Johns: Mr. Outisde and Mr. Inside." New York<br />
Times. 15 February 1987.<br />
.
Saltz, Jerry. "Our Picasso?" Village Voice. 3 January 2006.<br />
.<br />
Steinberg, Leo. Jasper Johns. New York: George Wittenborn, 1963.<br />
<strong>Guerra</strong> 13