Lamna nasus - Cites

Annexes to Draft Proposal to list Lamna nasus in Appendix II - January 2012
Annex 1.
Figures and Tables
Table 1. Indices of percentage decline illustrated in Figure 2 (see proposal p. 5)
Table 2. Lamna nasus life history parameters
Table 3. Summary of population and catch trend data
Table 4. EU Commodity codes related to trade in Lamna nasus.
Table 5. EU imports of porbeagle Lamna nasus products, products (fresh and frozen) by source
countries/territories, value and weight, 2010 and 2011.
Table 6. EU exports of Lamna nasus products (fresh and frozen) by destination, value and weight,
2010-2011.
Figure 1. Porbeagle Lamna nasus (see proposal p. 1)
Figure 2. Decline trends for porbeagle Lamna nasus stocks (see proposal p. 4)
Figure 3. Global Lamna nasus distribution (Source: FAO FIGIS)
Figure 4. FAO fishing areas
Figure 5. Global reported landings (tonnes) of Lamna nasus by major FAO fishing areas, 1950–2009.
(Source: FAO FishStat) (Data will be updated at a later stage)
Figure 6. Landings (tonnes) of Lamna nasus from the Northeast Atlantic by major fishing States, 1950–
2009. (Source: FAO Fishstat) (Data will be updated at a later stage)
Figure 7. Landings (tonnes) of Lamna nasus from ICES Areas (Northeast Atlantic), 1973–2009.
(Source: ICES Working Group on Elasmobranch Fishes 2010) (Data will be updated at a later
stage)
Figure 8. Landings (tonnes) of Lamna nasus by Norway in the Northeast Atlantic, 1926–2009. (Source:
Norwegian fisheries data & ICES WGEF) (Data will be updated at a later stage)
Figure 9. Landings (tonnes) of Lamna nasus by Denmark in the Northeast Atlantic, 1954–2009.
(Source: ICES Working Group on Elasmobranch Fishes) (Data will be updated at a later stage)
Figure 10. Landings (tonnes) of Lamna nasus by Faroe Islands in the Northeast Atlantic, 1973–2009.
(Source: ICES WGEF and European Commission.) (Data will be updated at a later stage)
Figure 11. French landings (tonnes) of Lamna nasus in the Northeast Atlantic, 1978–2009. (Source:
ICES Working Group on Elasmobranch Fishes) (Data will be updated at a later stage)
Figure 12. Surplus production age-structured model fits to French longline CPUE indices (assuming
virgin conditions in 1926) for northeast Atlantic porbeagle shark. Source ICCAT SCRS/ICES
2009.
Figure 13. Depletion in total biomass (upper panel) and numbers (lower panel) for a surplus production
age-structured model for Northeast Atlantic porbeagle shark. The dots indicated on the line
correspond to depletion at the beginning of the modern period (1972) and current depletion
(2008).Source ICCAT/ICES 2009.
Figure 14. Lamna nasus landings in the Northwest Atlantic, 1961–2008 (excluding unreported high seas
captures). (Source: Campana et al. 2010)
Figure 15. Estimated trends in numbers of mature females (top), age-1 recruits (centre) and total
number of Lamna nasus in Canadian waters, 1960–2010, from four porbeagle population
models (all show similar trajectories). (Source: Campana et al. 2010.)
Figure 16. Comparison of recovery targets and trajectories for the Canadian porbeagle stock during
2009–2100, obtained using Population Viability Analysis from four population models projected
deterministically under four different exploitation rates (0% to 8% per annum). (Source:
Campana et al. 2010.)
Figure 17. New Zealand commercial landings of porbeagle sharks reported by fishers and processors
(LFRR), 1989/90 to 2004/05. (Source Ministry of Fisheries 2008.)
Figure 18. Unstandardised CPUE indices (number of Lamna nasus per 1000 hooks) for the New
Zealand tuna longline fishery based on observer reports.
Figure 19. Relative spawning stock biomass (SSB) trend for the catch free age structured production
model, assuming virgin conditions in 1961, for southwest Atlantic porbeagle shark.
Figure 20. Southern hemisphere landings of porbeagle Lamna nasus, 1990–2009 (FISHSTAT).
Annexes p. 1 of 24
AC26 Doc. 26.2, Annex 1 – p. 15
AC26 Doc. 26.2
Annex / Anexo /Annexe
(English only / únicamente en inglés / seulement en anglais)