Social, Humanitarian and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM)

Social, Humanitarian and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM) Social, Humanitarian and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM)

22.08.2013 Views

do provide hope that an improvement in the situation of indigenous peoples is possible. The impoverishment of indigenous peoples is not a problem that is confined to the developing world. The united States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand also have small indigenous populations that exhibit developmental indices well below those of the nonindigenous populations. in terms of unemployment, indigenous rates are two to three times higher in these countries than the non-indigenous rates. As of 2009 in New Zealand, for example, 7.7% of indigenous peoples did not have meaningful employment, as opposed to 3.8% of the rest of the population. 176 Income levels for indigenous populations are significantly lower than those for non-indigenous groups; in the United States, Native Americans earn approximately half of what the general population makes. In Canada, 60% of the indigenous population in cities live below the poverty line, including 80% of indigenous peoples in Winnipeg. 177 Of these countries, Australia has the worst record in terms of indigenous poverty, with only 34% of indigenous peoples owning their own In developed countries, like the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, indigenous peoples comprise a large proportion of the poor population homes and half of all indigenous communities lacking access to a safe water supply. 178 As mentioned in the introduction to this topic, the need to diminish the impoverishment of indigenous peoples can be thought of as an aspect of the first MDG: to eradicate extreme poverty and hunger worldwide. The specific subgoals of the first MDG are to halve the proportion of people living on less than $1 a day and the proportion of people who suffer from hunger and to achieve decent employment for women, men, and young people. The twelve years since the establishment of the MDGs have seen mixed overall progress toward these targets. Only slight progress has been made in reducing hunger; while the percentage of people that are undernourished has dropped from 19.8% to 15.5% between 1990 and 2008, the overall number of undernourished individuals has remained stagnant at around 850 million, and rates of undernourishment are still around 20% in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia. 179 A similar situation is evident with the target of achieving decent employment, with a decrease in the working poverty rate but not in the absolute number of employed people living beneath the poverty line. The vast majority of progress in the area has been made in eastern Asia, meaning that the situation remains grim for the poor in other regions. 180 On a more positive note, however, the first subgoal of the first MDG, halving the number of people living on less than $1 per day, has likely already been achieved on a global scale. According to a United Nations progress report on the MDG, the portion of people living on less than $1.25 (inflation-adjusted) per day dropped from 47% in 1990 to 24% in 2008; a preliminary World Bank report has this figure even lower for 2010, which would put the poverty rate at less than half of the 1990 baseline. 181 While the global progress on poverty reduction is laudable, it masks the fact that many indigenous populations are not enjoying the same reductions in impoverishment and hunger. Most countries will likely reach the benchmark set out in the Millennium Declaration of halving the number of proportion of 42 Melbourne Host Directorate PTY LTD | Office of Media and Design

people living on $1 per day, but the indigenous groups within their borders will not. 182 Because indigenous peoples do not make up a large percentage of the total population of many countries, the levels of various development indicators achieved by these countries are hardly affected by worse statistics for indigenous communities. That should not be taken to mean, however, that the economic development of indigenous communities should not be a priority for national governments. Many policies aimed at reducing poverty and hunger to the targets set in the first MDG do not reach indigenous peoples and do not take their specific needs and circumstances into account. 183 Any plan to achieve true success with the Millennium Development Goals will have to include special policies designed specifically for indigenous peoples. the importance of targeting indigenous peoples for achieving the MDGs becomes evident by examining the progress of nations and their indigenous populations toward various MDG targets. Two types of countries emerge through this analysis. The first are countries that are on track to achieve certain MDG targets but have indigenous minorities that will not reach the same level of improvement. Minorities in Vietnam, for example, have poverty rates 40% higher than the majority ethnic population. Mexico, a member of the Organisation for economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), is likely to reach almost all of the MDG targets, but the region of Metlatonoc, which is 98% indigenous, has development indices comparable to Malawi and Angola, two of the most underdeveloped countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. 184 the second category of countries are those that are not going to reach some of the MDG targets because of their indigenous minority groups, including many African nations like Cameroon, Mali, and Senegal. In Niger, for example, 29% of children experienced nutrition deprivation in 2006, a figure that was elevated due to the 33% and 30% rates among the Peul and tuareg minority populations. 185 these statistics make it clear that more must be done to specifically target indigenous peoples in order to achieve the MdGs for all segments of the population. Many people working toward improving the situation for indigenous peoples believe that the framework of the MDGs needs to be altered if we hope to achieve the MDG targets among indigenous populations. Firstly, the MDGs do not explain the need to address indigenous groups differently. Because of this, national development policies do not take indigenous groups into account. A survey of MDG reports from various nations shows that 68% of countries’ plans do not respond to the special needs of indigenous peoples, and many do not even mention the existence of indigenous peoples at all; additionally, when indigenous populations are mentioned in these reports, it is almost exclusive in the sections about the second MDG, which concern universal primary education. 186,187 As shown above, general statistics on MDG progress make the condition of indigenous peoples invisible. Secondly, the desire to achieve the MdG targets has encouraged some countries to take actions that harm their indigenous populations, like increased mining efforts in the Philippines and seizing of pastoral lands for agriculture in Kenya. 188 thirdly, the MdGs are not framed in a human rightsbased way, meaning that they do not take into consideration the fact that a population cannot make significant developmental progress if they do not have basic human rights. It is impossible to talk about reducing hunger, for example, without first ensuring that everyone has secured his or her right to food. 189 Finally, the MDGs are enumerated as development targets and do not take account for the structural causes of poverty, including discrimination and a lack of indigenous civic involvement as discussed above. 190 Reflecting on the way that the MDGs have been 43 Melbourne Host Directorate PTY LTD | Office of Media and Design

do provide hope that an improvement in the situation<br />

of indigenous peoples is possible.<br />

The impoverishment of indigenous peoples is not a<br />

problem that is confined to the developing world. The<br />

united States, Canada, Australia, <strong>and</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong><br />

also have small indigenous populations that exhibit<br />

developmental indices well below those of the nonindigenous<br />

populations. in terms of unemployment,<br />

indigenous rates are two to three times higher in these<br />

countries than the non-indigenous rates. As of 2009 in<br />

New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, for example, 7.7% of indigenous peoples<br />

did not have meaningful employment, as opposed to<br />

3.8% of the rest of the population. 176 Income levels<br />

for indigenous populations are significantly lower<br />

than those for non-indigenous groups; in the United<br />

States, Native Americans earn approximately half of<br />

what the general population makes. In Canada, 60%<br />

of the indigenous population in cities live below the<br />

poverty line, including 80% of indigenous peoples<br />

in Winnipeg. 177 Of these countries, Australia has the<br />

worst record in terms of indigenous poverty, with<br />

only 34% of indigenous peoples owning their own<br />

In developed countries, like the United States, Canada, Australia,<br />

<strong>and</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, indigenous peoples comprise a large proportion<br />

of the poor population<br />

homes <strong>and</strong> half of all indigenous communities lacking<br />

access to a safe water supply. 178<br />

As mentioned in the introduction to this topic, the<br />

need to diminish the impoverishment of indigenous<br />

peoples can be thought of as an aspect of the first<br />

MDG: to eradicate extreme poverty <strong>and</strong> hunger<br />

worldwide. The specific subgoals of the first MDG<br />

are to halve the proportion of people living on less<br />

than $1 a day <strong>and</strong> the proportion of people who suffer<br />

from hunger <strong>and</strong> to achieve decent employment for<br />

women, men, <strong>and</strong> young people. The twelve years<br />

since the establishment of the MDGs have seen mixed<br />

overall progress toward these targets. Only slight<br />

progress has been made in reducing hunger; while<br />

the percentage of people that are undernourished<br />

has dropped from 19.8% to 15.5% between 1990<br />

<strong>and</strong> 2008, the overall number of undernourished<br />

individuals has remained stagnant at around 850<br />

million, <strong>and</strong> rates of undernourishment are still<br />

around 20% in Sub-Saharan Africa <strong>and</strong> Southern<br />

Asia. 179 A similar situation is evident with the target of<br />

achieving decent employment, with a decrease in the<br />

working poverty rate but not in the absolute number<br />

of employed people living beneath the poverty line.<br />

The vast majority of progress in the area has been<br />

made in eastern Asia, meaning that the situation<br />

remains grim for the poor in other regions. 180 On a<br />

more positive note, however, the first subgoal of the<br />

first MDG, halving the number of people living on less<br />

than $1 per day, has likely already been achieved on a<br />

global scale. According to a United Nations progress<br />

report on the MDG, the portion of people living on<br />

less than $1.25 (inflation-adjusted) per day dropped<br />

from 47% in 1990 to 24% in 2008; a preliminary World<br />

Bank report has this figure even lower for 2010, which<br />

would put the poverty rate at less than half of the<br />

1990 baseline. 181<br />

While the global progress on poverty reduction<br />

is laudable, it masks the fact that many indigenous<br />

populations are not enjoying the same reductions<br />

in impoverishment <strong>and</strong> hunger. Most countries will<br />

likely reach the benchmark set out in the Millennium<br />

Declaration of halving the number of proportion of<br />

42<br />

Melbourne Host Directorate PTY LTD | Office of Media <strong>and</strong> Design

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!