Social, Humanitarian and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM)

Social, Humanitarian and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM) Social, Humanitarian and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM)

22.08.2013 Views

Saharan Africa. On her website, for example, Janet Museveni, the First Lady of Uganda and the national minister for the Karamoja region, calls upon pastoral Advanced farming equipment has allowed the agricultural industry of certain developed nations to flourish at the expensive of indigenous ways of life. farmers to settle their livestock on one location and begin practicing sedentary agriculture. 126 One of the regional industries in which the liberalization of trade has had the most effect is mining in Africa. Many African countries have liberalized their mining laws over the past thirty years to encourage foreign investment, in the hopes that this will help boost their economic growth and overall gross domestic product (GDP), a primary measure of economic development. In response, many British, American, Canadian, and Australian companies have established operations on these previously untouched lands with little regard for the indigenous populations that live and farm there. The presence of these transnational companies is so extensive that over 2,600 bilateral agreements had been signed between African governments and foreign mining companies by 2008. 127 As may be expected, these transnational mining companies generally do not take environmental factors into consideration when building their infrastructure and implementing their extractive techniques, which further harms the situation in which indigenous populations find themselves. In Africa, the most common environmental impact is the dissemination of toxic chemicals in the water supply, which has ruined crops and farming land and has caused dangerous illnesses and problems with pregnancies and childbirth. 128 Because they are no longer able to practice their traditional farming techniques, which are usually relatively sustainable, indigenous peoples are often forced to employ other, less environmentally-friendly methods; this worsens the situation and leaves them with no means of subsistence or employment. This pattern is not only evident in the African mining industry but is also observed in Indonesia’s nickel industry and the Amazonian natural gas industry. 129 Disregard for Indigenous Land Rights Another cause of the impoverishment of indigenous populations is the disregard for local land rights, an issue that is closely connected to the liberalization of trade regulations. As alluded to above, in the process of creating the infrastructure for massive agricultural or resource extraction industries in a developing country, many governments and transnational corporations either explicitly or implicitly expel the indigenous residents from their land. in many Asian and African nations, indigenous peoples have no title to the land on which they reside, and the government has the complete authority to distribute that land to members of the country’s ethnic majority or to domestic or foreign companies. 130 When their land is taken away, most indigenous peoples lose their traditional methods of subsistence and are either forced to live in extreme poverty or migrate to a city for employment, another problem that will be discussed. The problems with the legal frameworks for indigenous land rights are numerous. Many countries simply do not have such laws in the first place, so indigenous populations have no authority 34 Melbourne Host Directorate PTY LTD | Office of Media and Design

over the land that they have lived on for centuries. Another problem is the failure to consult indigenous communities when developing land rights policies. Many indigenous communities have their own local land practices that policymakers completely disregard in the drafting of their frameworks for land rights. The Samburu of Kenya, for example, use the Lkiama system, which their ancestors developed centuries ago. The Lkiama system states that all tribal lands are collectively owned by the community and entrusts them to a group of elders, who then distribute them for use to the rest of the tribe. The Samburu also negotiate directly with other tribes for lands rights, outside of the jurisdiction of national laws. The Kenyan government, however, did not take the Lkiama system or these direct negotiations in account when developing its new land policy, which has led to dissention among the Samburu people. 131 Further problems with legal frameworks for local land rights include overly complicated procedures for securing these land rights, imprecision in the definitions of who is entitled to local land rights, and conflict over ownership of natural resources within certain territories. 132 Upon removing indigenous populations from ancestral lands, governments sometimes resettle them on lands entirely unfamiliar to the populations. For example, the Batwa people of Central Africa have traditionally lived in the forests of Rwanda, Uganda, Burundi, and the eastern part of the democratic Republic of the Congo. In past few decades, these governments have expelled the Batwa from their lands because they wished to either undertake a large infrastructural development program or form a national park or nature reserve on the territory. Currently, fewer than 10% of the Batwa still retain access to traditional forest lands while the rest have been resettled to villages on the periphery of mainstream society. 133 These resettled citizens cannot continue the forms of employment that they used to undertake in the forest, and discrimination from the majority ethnic group prevents them from obtaining meaningful work. Most end up working as labor on other people’s farms and have to borrow food in order to survive. This entraps the Batwa people in a cycle of debt from which they rarely escape. While the populations of these African nations are rapidly rising, the Batwa population is falling, most likely because of the extreme poverty they face and the subsequent lack of access to food and healthcare. 134 The problem of indigenous populations losing their local land rights is not always forced upon them by national governments. In some instances, immediate economic pressures can encourage indigenous peoples to sell their plots to whomever is willing to pay, whether it be members of the majority population or a dominant company. The Olkaria Maasai population of Kenya, for example, live in Hell’s Gate National Park, where the Kenya electricity Generating Company (KenGen), a parastatal organization that produces the vast majority of the electricity consumed in the country, has been developing geothermal energy since before the founding of the park in 1984. After a long legal dispute, a Kenyan court ruled in 2009 that the Maasai had rights to the land but, ignoring the local land customs as discussed above, divided the land into plots owned by individual members of the Maasai tribe. While some have retained their land and resumed traditional agricultural practices, KenGen has bought out many others, paying them substantial amounts for their individual titles. This issue has brought significant intertribal violence and conflict to the region, as those that do not sell were angry with those that do. 135 Although it seems that the selling of individual titles benefits the economic situations of these Maasai, in the long run it will most likely leave them in a worse position, as most of them do not have the education or the skills for other occupations 35 Melbourne Host Directorate PTY LTD | Office of Media and Design

over the l<strong>and</strong> that they have lived on for centuries.<br />

Another problem is the failure to consult indigenous<br />

communities when developing l<strong>and</strong> rights policies.<br />

Many indigenous communities have their own<br />

local l<strong>and</strong> practices that policymakers completely<br />

disregard in the drafting of their frameworks for l<strong>and</strong><br />

rights. The Samburu of Kenya, for example, use the<br />

Lkiama system, which their ancestors developed<br />

centuries ago. The Lkiama system states that all<br />

tribal l<strong>and</strong>s are collectively owned by the community<br />

<strong>and</strong> entrusts them to a group of elders, who then<br />

distribute them for use to the rest of the tribe. The<br />

Samburu also negotiate directly with other tribes for<br />

l<strong>and</strong>s rights, outside of the jurisdiction of national<br />

laws. The Kenyan government, however, did not take<br />

the Lkiama system or these direct negotiations in<br />

account when developing its new l<strong>and</strong> policy, which<br />

has led to dissention among the Samburu people.<br />

131 Further problems with legal frameworks for local<br />

l<strong>and</strong> rights include overly complicated procedures<br />

for securing these l<strong>and</strong> rights, imprecision in the<br />

definitions of who is entitled to local l<strong>and</strong> rights, <strong>and</strong><br />

conflict over ownership of natural resources within<br />

certain territories. 132<br />

Upon removing indigenous populations from<br />

ancestral l<strong>and</strong>s, governments sometimes resettle<br />

them on l<strong>and</strong>s entirely unfamiliar to the populations.<br />

For example, the Batwa people of Central Africa have<br />

traditionally lived in the forests of Rw<strong>and</strong>a, Ug<strong>and</strong>a,<br />

Burundi, <strong>and</strong> the eastern part of the democratic<br />

Republic of the Congo. In past few decades, these<br />

governments have expelled the Batwa from their<br />

l<strong>and</strong>s because they wished to either undertake a<br />

large infrastructural development program or form<br />

a national park or nature reserve on the territory.<br />

Currently, fewer than 10% of the Batwa still retain<br />

access to traditional forest l<strong>and</strong>s while the rest<br />

have been resettled to villages on the periphery of<br />

mainstream society. 133 These resettled citizens cannot<br />

continue the forms of employment that they used to<br />

undertake in the forest, <strong>and</strong> discrimination from the<br />

majority ethnic group prevents them from obtaining<br />

meaningful work. Most end up working as labor on<br />

other people’s farms <strong>and</strong> have to borrow food in<br />

order to survive. This entraps the Batwa people in a<br />

cycle of debt from which they rarely escape. While<br />

the populations of these African nations are rapidly<br />

rising, the Batwa population is falling, most likely<br />

because of the extreme poverty they face <strong>and</strong> the<br />

subsequent lack of access to food <strong>and</strong> healthcare. 134<br />

The problem of indigenous populations losing their<br />

local l<strong>and</strong> rights is not always forced upon them by<br />

national governments. In some instances, immediate<br />

economic pressures can encourage indigenous<br />

peoples to sell their plots to whomever is willing to pay,<br />

whether it be members of the majority population or a<br />

dominant company. The Olkaria Maasai population of<br />

Kenya, for example, live in Hell’s Gate National Park,<br />

where the Kenya electricity Generating Company<br />

(KenGen), a parastatal organization that produces<br />

the vast majority of the electricity consumed in the<br />

country, has been developing geothermal energy<br />

since before the founding of the park in 1984. After a<br />

long legal dispute, a Kenyan court ruled in 2009 that<br />

the Maasai had rights to the l<strong>and</strong> but, ignoring the<br />

local l<strong>and</strong> customs as discussed above, divided the<br />

l<strong>and</strong> into plots owned by individual members of the<br />

Maasai tribe. While some have retained their l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

resumed traditional agricultural practices, KenGen<br />

has bought out many others, paying them substantial<br />

amounts for their individual titles. This issue has<br />

brought significant intertribal violence <strong>and</strong> conflict to<br />

the region, as those that do not sell were angry with<br />

those that do. 135 Although it seems that the selling of<br />

individual titles benefits the economic situations of<br />

these Maasai, in the long run it will most likely leave<br />

them in a worse position, as most of them do not<br />

have the education or the skills for other occupations<br />

35<br />

Melbourne Host Directorate PTY LTD | Office of Media <strong>and</strong> Design

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!