Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden

Histogramme zu den Skalafragen
The aim of the course was clear from the very
beginning.
100%
75%
50%
25%
completely
54%
31%
15%
not at all
mw = 1.6
n = 13
s = 0.8
The instructor made sure that students understood
the learning material
100%
75%
50%
25%
completely
54%
38%
8%
not at all
mw = 1.5
n = 13
s = 0.7
The media incorporated in the course (board,
transparencies, presentations, ...) contributed to the
100%
75%
50%
25%
completely
33% 33% 33%
not at all
n = 12
mw = 2
s = 0.9
The instructor was able to answer questions posed in
class satisfactorily.
100%
75%
50%
25%
completely
71%
29%
not at all
mw = 1.3
n = 14
s = 0.5
In general, the instructor offered adequate assistance
and support in regard to the learning of course
100%
75%
50%
25%
completely
55%
27%
18%
not at all
mw = 1.6
n = 11
s = 0.8
By the end of the semester, the aim of the course
had been achieved.
100%
75%
50%
25%
completely
36%
21%
43%
Prof. Dr. Paul J.J. Welfens, Globalization, Integration and International Organizations
14.07.2011 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 5
not at all
mw = 2.1
n = 14
s = 0.9
The explanations provided by the instructor were
comprehensible.
100%
75%
50%
25%
completely
57%
29%
14%
not at all
mw = 1.6
n = 14
s = 0.8
This part of the module is in line with the module as a
whole.
100%
75%
50%
25%
completely
69%
15% 15%
not at all
mw = 1.5
n = 13
s = 0.8
The requirements for earning a "Schein" were clearly
stated.
100%
75%
50%
25%
completely
50%
21%
29%
not at all
mw = 1.8
n = 14
The overall effectiveness of this course was
100%
75%
50%
25%
very high
46%
38%
15%
very low
s = 0.9
mw = 1.7
n = 13
s = 0.8
Each session adequately made reference to the
material covered in the last session.
100%
75%
50%
25%
completely
46%
31%
15%
8%
not at all
mw = 1.8
n = 13
The instructor appeared to be well-prepared.
100%
75%
50%
25%
completely
73%
27%
not at all
s = 1
mw = 1.3
n = 11
The material of the course corresponds to the
description of the module.
100%
75%
50%
25%
completely
54%
31%
15%
not at all
s = 0.5
mw = 1.6
n = 13
s = 0.8
There was sufficient opportunity to speak with the
instructor during his or her office hours.
100%
75%
50%
25%
completely
58%
17%
25%
not at all
In general, I found the course to be
100%
75%
50%
25%
very good
64%
36%
very bad
mw = 1.7
n = 12
s = 0.9
mw = 1.4
n = 11
s = 0.5