21.08.2013 Views

UNIVERSITÄT POTSDAM - Prof. Dr. Paul JJ Welfens

UNIVERSITÄT POTSDAM - Prof. Dr. Paul JJ Welfens

UNIVERSITÄT POTSDAM - Prof. Dr. Paul JJ Welfens

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Tab 9: Sources of Growth in the Business Sector, Germany 1961 - 1990<br />

Source Average annual percentage changes<br />

61 - 90 61 - 65 66 - 70 71 - 75 76 - 80 81 - 85 86 - 90<br />

k t 1.5 2.5 1.9 1.8 1.1 0.8 1.0<br />

l t 0.2 0.7 0.1 -0.6 0.5 -0.6 1.1<br />

pat t−2 0.1 0.3 0.2 -0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3<br />

lex t 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.8<br />

tc t 1.1 1.2 1.7 1.2 1.3 0.7 0.7<br />

Total:<br />

fitted 3.3 5.2 4.3 2.3 3.2 0.9 4.0<br />

realized 3.3 5.2 4.4 1.7 3.6 1.1 3.8<br />

Note: Differences between the sums of the individual components of the growth rates and the fitted total<br />

growth rates are caused by rounding up and down and by joint effects.<br />

Due to the approximation of different sources or causes of technical progress and of<br />

information and communication by means of appropriate indicator variables, it was<br />

then possible to assess, at least roughly, the effects of these variables as well as of the<br />

usual production factors on the growth of real gross value-added. The results of the expost<br />

forecasts of average annual growth rates for the whole observation period as well<br />

as for different subperiods are reported in Table 9. The comparison of the realized total<br />

and the forecasted total growth rates of real gross value-added in the business sector<br />

without agriculture, forestry, and fishing and without housing rental shows a good fitting<br />

of the model to the observed data. Only in the first half of the seventies when the<br />

first oil price crisis takes place does the model overestimate the growth rate by 0.6 percentage<br />

points. Partly to even things out, the model underestimates growth by 0.4 percentage<br />

points in the second half of the seventies.<br />

Turning to the individual factors, it can be seen that the development of the<br />

capital stock has the greatest impact on the growth rates of gross value-added in most<br />

cases, accounting for 0.8 to 2.5 percentage points. This result is in accord with the results<br />

for other countries (cf. BUDD / HOBBIS, 1989a, BUDD / HOBBIS, 1989b and<br />

COE / MOGHADAM, 1993). The influence of telephone calls (as an indicator for information<br />

and communication) is in second position, accounting for 0.7 to 1.7 percentage<br />

points of the average annual growth rates. Here, it must be stressed, that even in<br />

phases of low growth rates this influence was a substantial engine of the remaining<br />

economic growth. The impact of the factor labor on economic growth is strongly influenced<br />

by fluctuations of the number of employees due to business cycles. Especially<br />

the reductions of the number of employees after the first and second oil price crises had<br />

negative impacts on economic growth. On the other hand, the strong increase of the<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!