21.08.2013 Views

UNIVERSITÄT POTSDAM - Prof. Dr. Paul JJ Welfens

UNIVERSITÄT POTSDAM - Prof. Dr. Paul JJ Welfens

UNIVERSITÄT POTSDAM - Prof. Dr. Paul JJ Welfens

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

structure capital were of equal size in the US and Euroland, the slower growth rate of<br />

gQ in the latter – mainly caused by low infrastructure expenditures in Germany, Belgium<br />

and Austria – would explain part of the transatlantic growth differential. Germany<br />

together with Belgium indeed recorded the lowest ratio of public investment to GDP in<br />

2000; this might be understandable in Belgium where government is facing the challenge<br />

to reduce a debt-GDP ratio of more than 100% in 2000, but for reunited Germany<br />

that is a real puzzle since its debt-GDP ratio stood at an uncritical 60%; additionally<br />

since economic catching-up of eastern Germany requires relatively high public investment<br />

one would expect Germany to have one of the highest public investment-GDP<br />

ratios among the members of Euroland.<br />

If we assume for the medium term that the number of skilled labor is exogenous<br />

– not a realistic presumption for the long run taking into account long-term opportunities<br />

for training and education – then the growth rate Y/H in the above equation is identical<br />

with the overall growth rate of output.<br />

3. Innovation, ICT Dynamics and Growth: Theoretical and Empirical Aspects<br />

3.1 Basic Theoretical Issues<br />

The positive impact of technological change and innovation on fostering economic<br />

growth is generally acknowledged. Although the growth enhancing effects of new<br />

products and processes had been known for some time, it took some decades to attract<br />

the interest of researchers to study technical change. This lack of interest may be explained<br />

in part by complex procedures ruling science and technology (S&T) and the<br />

unknown mechanisms translating innovations into broad-based economic effects.<br />

However, it is a matter of fact that technological change is a driving force behind economic<br />

growth.<br />

Thus, it is not surprising that recent approaches in growth theory pay much attention<br />

to technological change or its “mate”: human capital or knowledge. The basic<br />

models of the new growth theory which are in the meantime standard in modern textbooks<br />

are presented in ROMER (1986), LUCAS (1988) and ROMER (1990). A large<br />

part of new growth theory assumes a beneficial know-how “transfer” from a knowledge-generating<br />

sector which performs R&D to the sector of the economy in which<br />

companies simply adopt it. Part of this knowledge as a result of R&D efforts is paid for<br />

by the receiving firms while some part diffuses without appropriate compensation.<br />

Thus, external effects of knowledge creation (so called spillover effects) are followed<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!