21.08.2013 Views

The Future is Bright for Medical Home: Prevention and ... - HRSA

The Future is Bright for Medical Home: Prevention and ... - HRSA

The Future is Bright for Medical Home: Prevention and ... - HRSA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Future</strong> <strong>is</strong> <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong>:<br />

<strong>Prevention</strong> <strong>and</strong> Quality in the Context of <strong>Medical</strong><br />

<strong>Home</strong><br />

Jeanne McAll<strong>is</strong>ter, BSN, MS, MHA<br />

Paula Duncan, MD, FAAP<br />

Angela Tobin, AM, LSW<br />

Jane Bassewitz, MA


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Future</strong> <strong>is</strong> <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong>:<br />

<strong>Prevention</strong> <strong>and</strong> Quality in the Context of<br />

<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong><br />

Jeanne W. McAll<strong>is</strong>ter, BSN, MS, MHA<br />

www.medicalhomeimprovement.org<br />

di lh i t


<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong>s: Living, Breathing, Complex Organizations


<strong>Medical</strong> home trans<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> high quality<br />

care across the lifespan since 1993<br />

As a result of our session today learners learners will:<br />

• Explain the primary care medical home, its relationship to<br />

<strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s as a key preventive component, <strong>and</strong> d<strong>is</strong>cuss<br />

national, state <strong>and</strong> practice level activities of interest to all<br />

MCH partners.<br />

• Link quality q yimprovement p methodologies g to the achievement<br />

of improved/trans<strong>for</strong>med primary care<br />

• Explore key actions/roles around partnerships with health<br />

care teams teams, engagement of families <strong>and</strong> care coordination<br />

• D<strong>is</strong>cuss specific personal/professional strategies <strong>for</strong><br />

implementation that could be tried by learners "next week".


Agenda<br />

Welcome<br />

<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s Overview<br />

• What <strong>is</strong> it?<br />

• How do they relate?<br />

• Quality Improvement strategies<br />

Buzz Group: Outreach to Primary Care<br />

Break<br />

Breakout Groups:<br />

• FFamily il EEngagement t<br />

• Care Coordination<br />

Next Steps: What can/will you do?


<strong>The</strong> Primary Care <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong><br />

At the Crossroads Integrating:<br />

Vertically –among health care systems/special<strong>is</strong>ts/PCPs/patients & families<br />

HHorizontally i ll – among patients i & families/community f ili / i agencies/schools, i / h l etc …<br />

Continuously –with continuity of clinicians <strong>and</strong> medical home team members<br />

Longitudinally –over time with anticipatory guidance<br />

Health<br />

System<br />

Community<br />

Resources/Policies<br />

<strong>Medical</strong><br />

<strong>Home</strong><br />

Continuously<br />

Continuously…<br />

Longitudinally….


<strong>The</strong> Feeding <strong>and</strong> Nour<strong>is</strong>hing of a <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong><br />

A Few Good Food Analogies<br />

Pollan & Graumbach<br />

NYTimes Dr. Graumbach<br />

Eat food Get health care<br />

Not too much Not too much<br />

Mostly plants Mostly primary care<br />

Nutting et al – (Lessons from first Trans<strong>for</strong>MED demonstration)<br />

Primary care ‐ like healthy food food, works best at a local <strong>and</strong> personal level<br />

Kingsolver & McAll<strong>is</strong>ter Tomatoes …<br />

Animal, , Vegetable, g , Miracle, , by y Barbara Kingsolver g


Part of the local community<br />

“Barter” or exchange assets<br />

Local Tomato Grower <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong>?<br />

Value health, quality products, <strong>and</strong> safety<br />

Sell “product” directly to customers<br />

Livelihood <strong>is</strong> m<strong>is</strong>sion as well as business<br />

Customers show up week after week, at a community<br />

gathering place<br />

First names common; open door/welcoming policy<br />

Name of the heirloom tomato she <strong>is</strong> growing? { ? }


Local Tomato Grower <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong>?<br />

Part of the local community ✔<br />

“Barter” or exchange assets ✔<br />

Value health, quality products, <strong>and</strong> safety ✔<br />

Sell “product” directly to customers ✔<br />

Livelihood <strong>is</strong> m<strong>is</strong>sion as well as business ✔<br />

Customers show up week after week, at a community<br />

gathering place<br />

First names common; open door/welcoming policy ✔<br />

Name of the heirloom tomato she <strong>is</strong> growing? { “TRUST” }<br />


<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> – Timeline – <strong>The</strong> Pediatric Era<br />

1967 AAP centralized medical record = medical home<br />

1992 AAP Cal Sia –Hawaii<br />

• Pediatric <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong>; coordinates care with early intervention<br />

1994 <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s Guideines First publ<strong>is</strong>hed<br />

1996 AAP & MCHB<br />

• <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> initiatives ‐ children with special health care needs<br />

• CMHI applies li CQI methods th d to t office ffi practice ti change h methodology th d l<br />

2000 <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s Guidelines –2nd Edition<br />

2002 AAP selected by MCHB to implemt the next phase of <strong>Bright</strong><br />

<strong>Future</strong>s Initiative<br />

2003 <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> Index –first quantitative measure of “medical<br />

homeness” homeness ‐ developed, validated, publ<strong>is</strong>hed‐CMHI<br />

publ<strong>is</strong>hed CMHI


<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> – Timeline – <strong>The</strong> Pediatric Era<br />

2003 2006 –1 st , 2 nd National <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> Learning Collaborative<br />

• MCHB funded partnership between CMHI <strong>and</strong> NICHQ<br />

AAP/MCHB National Center <strong>for</strong> <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong><br />

Implementation /<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> Toolkit –uptakes CMHI/other<br />

tools l<br />

2007 <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s, 3rd Edition Released<br />

2007 AAP was awarded a second cooperative agreement to address<br />

implementation<br />

2008 <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s Tool <strong>and</strong> Resource Kit Released<br />

2010 CMHI awarded ddAHRQ AHRQ grant to study d medical di l hhome<br />

trans<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

CMHI awarded National Health Care Transition Center


A <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong><br />

• Is a community‐based community based primary care setting which<br />

provides <strong>and</strong> coordinates high quality, planned,<br />

family‐centered health promotion <strong>and</strong> prevention,<br />

acute illness care, <strong>and</strong> chronic condition<br />

management —across the lifespan.<br />

– Care in a medical home <strong>is</strong> rewarding <strong>for</strong> clinical teams to provide<br />

<strong>and</strong> sat<strong>is</strong>fying <strong>for</strong> patients <strong>and</strong> families to receive


<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> – Timeline –Primary Care<br />

Trans<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

1970’s First mention in pediatric literature<br />

2004 AAFP publ<strong>is</strong>hes <strong>The</strong> <strong>Future</strong> of Family Medicine<br />

• <strong>Medical</strong> home model <strong>is</strong> the foundation<br />

2006 ACP promotes Advanced Primary Care<br />

• Uses medical home language <strong>and</strong> model<br />

2007 Joint Statement on the Primary Care <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong><br />

• AAP, AAFP, ACP, <strong>and</strong> AOA; <strong>Medical</strong> home model as the st<strong>and</strong>ard of primary<br />

care<br />

2007 Er<strong>is</strong>a‐related Industries Committee launches the Patient‐Centered<br />

Primary Care Collaborative (PCPCC)<br />

• Pcpcc.net, (Waiting <strong>for</strong> pediatric incentives)<br />

New—Current New Current (January 2010 2010‐2011) 2011)<br />

• Medicare Advanced Primary Care Pilot Demonstrations…<br />

• Af<strong>for</strong>dable Care Act<br />

• AHRQ Trans<strong>for</strong>mation Studies (1 of 14 a pediatric study!)


Accountable Care Organizations<br />

Key Elements<br />

• Pi Primary CCare i<strong>is</strong> ffoundational d i l<br />

• Define Roles of Subspecial<strong>is</strong>ts<br />

• Dfi Define Role R l of f HHospitals it l<br />

• Governance<br />

• Define Population<br />

Challenges<br />

• R<strong>is</strong>k Adjustment<br />

• Time Horizon <strong>for</strong> Outcomes


Leveraging Opportunities<br />

Af<strong>for</strong>dable Care Act<br />

• Quality primary care, extended age to remain on family plan, no charge<br />

preventative care<br />

<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> – st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>for</strong> recognition<br />

• Reimbursement potential <strong>for</strong> population care/reg<strong>is</strong>tries, care plans,<br />

coordination coordination, population population, reg<strong>is</strong>tries reg<strong>is</strong>tries, care plans, plans etc. etc<br />

• Youth/family involvement, partnership <strong>and</strong> leadership<br />

• Professional Organizations (AAP, AAFP, ACP, AANP etc.)<br />

– Resources/toolkits / lk<br />

– Education, skills, proficiencies<br />

– Clinical training/residencies<br />

– MOC<br />

Accountable Care Organizations<br />

– Primary y<br />

Care <strong>is</strong> foundational


Families Want <strong>and</strong> Need<br />

• Offers a collaborative family family‐<br />

centered, team approach<br />

• Develops p a written summary y<br />

of critical care in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

• Has a developed p pprocess<br />

to<br />

integrate <strong>and</strong> coordinate care<br />

across multiple services


Emphas<strong>is</strong> on partnerships with families<br />

Continuum of ways y to engage gg p patients & families, ,<br />

as:


Every Child, Youth, & Adult<br />

Benefits from a Proactive, Planned, <strong>and</strong> Coordinated <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong><br />

• Jamie, an 11‐yo female, affected by Spina Bifida, arrives at<br />

pediatricians <strong>for</strong> a well child examination.<br />

examination<br />

• Special<strong>is</strong>ts—orthoped<strong>is</strong>t, urolog<strong>is</strong>t, <strong>and</strong> neurosurgeon<br />

• Jamie’s mother has two pressing concerns:<br />

1) JJamie i <strong>is</strong> i pubescent; b t will ill likely lik l begin b i menstruating t ti soon<br />

oHow to h<strong>and</strong>le th<strong>is</strong> event given Jamie’s catheterization program, (both<br />

at school <strong>and</strong> home).<br />

o Jamie’s Jamie s father has declared he does not want to be a part of Jamie Jamie’ss<br />

“home team” once menarche has occurred.<br />

2) Jamie endures teasing at school because her periodic urine leakage<br />

leaves an odor.<br />

o<strong>The</strong> office nurse finds that none of the recent special<strong>is</strong>t’s notes have<br />

arrived &<br />

o<strong>The</strong> PCP did not plan time to address these concerns today…


Jamie in a <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong><br />

Proactive, Planned, Coordinated Care<br />

Time Form trusting partnership with care team.<br />

Teamwork <strong>for</strong><br />

Team <strong>is</strong> getting stronger; partner in helping<br />

Jamie to take a more active role/ progressively plan<br />

increased independence<br />

Care Plan Team & family develop, use, <strong>and</strong> share a<br />

plan of care<br />

Learning to partner<br />

in care <br />

Jamie, encouraged, begins to ask questions; she<br />

contacts her coordinator <strong>for</strong> ass<strong>is</strong>tance or questions<br />

Explicit p roles Family y underst<strong>and</strong>s their role<br />

‐ Prepare questions, maintain records, <strong>and</strong> ensure<br />

evaluations or tests are sent regularly<br />

Events Coordination & community outreach;<br />

‐ Gather in<strong>for</strong>mation about events: school/urgent care/ER/<br />

hospitalizations—family underst<strong>and</strong>s staff want <strong>and</strong> need to<br />

be in<strong>for</strong>med<br />

Leadership Family’s ability to lead <strong>is</strong> variable/may at times need<br />

more active ti engagement t of f coordinator di t & team.<br />

t


Measuring the <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong><br />

• Quality Assurance Assurance—Do Do you meet st<strong>and</strong>ards?<br />

– National Committee <strong>for</strong> Quality Assurance (NCQA)<br />

• 10 St<strong>and</strong>ards; Levels 1, 2, <strong>and</strong> 3<br />

• Basic requirement <strong>for</strong> many pilots<br />

• Quality Improvement—Where you are on the<br />

medical home continuum?<br />

– CMHI <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> Index (Validation Study 2003)<br />

– <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> Family Index & Survey<br />

• Pediatric & adult versions: long & short <strong>for</strong>ms


<strong>The</strong> CMHI <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> Index<br />

6 Domains (25 <strong>The</strong>mes)<br />

• Organizational Capacity (7)<br />

• Chronic Condition Management (6)<br />

• Care Coordination (6)<br />

• Community Outreach (2)<br />

• Data Management (2)<br />

• Quality Improvement/Change (2)<br />

Cooley Cooley, McAll<strong>is</strong>ter McAll<strong>is</strong>ter, Sherrieb, Sherrieb & Clark; Ambulatory Pediatrics, Pediatrics July 2003


Support pp <strong>for</strong> ppediatric trans<strong>for</strong>mation leads to 30% improvement p overall in 3 years, y<br />

n=10.


Pediatric <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong><br />

Family Outcome Data of Significance<br />

• ↑ Family y feedback<br />

• ↑ Care plans/summary<br />

• ↑ Health status<br />

• ↓ Parental Worry<br />

• ↓ School absences<br />

• ↓ ER, hospitalizations, & specialty v<strong>is</strong>its<br />

Pre & Post n=83 data sets, (p‐value of


CMHI National Outcomes Study<br />

Cost/Utilization<br />

<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> Index; 43 Practices, 7 Plans/5 States<br />

– Higher overall MHI scores or higher domain scores<br />

<strong>for</strong> care coordination coordination, chronic condition<br />

management, office organizational capacity<br />

• Lower hospitalization rates<br />

– Higher Chronic Condition Management domain<br />

scores<br />

• Fewer ER v<strong>is</strong>its<br />

Cooley, McAll<strong>is</strong>ter, Sherrieb, Kuhlthau, Pediatrics, July 2009


Where does practice<br />

support come from<br />

now?<br />

What does it take?


CMHI Lessons Learned<br />

• Patient/family engagement<br />

– GGuidance id & vitality it lit ( (see continuum ti of f strategies t t i slide) lid )<br />

• Trans<strong>for</strong>mation help<br />

Support pp redesign g <strong>and</strong> improvement p processes p<br />

– Guide with their personal mastery<br />

• Teamwork, access, population approaches, coordinated planned care,<br />

technology skills, etc.<br />

• Leadership<br />

Alignment of messages from all interested/investing in<br />

primary care<br />

• Payment re<strong>for</strong>m<br />

& reinvest payment into primary care infrastructure/<br />

coordination of care


CMHI’s CMHI s TAPPP (Gap) Analys<strong>is</strong>:<br />

A <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> Assessment with Trans<strong>for</strong>mation &<br />

Measurement Methods<br />

• Teamwork<br />

• Access & Communication<br />

• Population Approach<br />

• Planned, Coordinated Care<br />

• Patient & Family‐Centered Care


TAPPP TAPPP (Pediatric & Adult Adult Versions)<br />

Incorporates:<br />

• <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> Definition<br />

• <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> Index<br />

• Elements from:<br />

– Care Model <strong>for</strong> Child Health in the <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong><br />

– PCMH St<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

– Other criteria<br />

• CMHI lessons learned –what it takes


CMHI ‐ TAPPP Process


Patient & Family‐Centered <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong><br />

Across the lifespan <strong>for</strong> children, youth <strong>and</strong> adults<br />

Re<strong>for</strong>med Coverage & Continuous Trans<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

Re<strong>for</strong>med Coverage & Continuous Trans<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

Supports


References/Resources<br />

• McAll<strong>is</strong>ter JW, Presler E, Turchi R, Antonelli RC. Achieving Effective Care Coordination in the<br />

<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong>. Pediatric Annals. 2009:38(10)<br />

• McAll<strong>is</strong>ter JW, Sherrieb K, Cooley WC. Improvement in the Family‐Centered Family Centered <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong><br />

Enhances Outcomes <strong>for</strong> Children & Youth with Special Health Care Needs. Journal of<br />

Ambulatory Care Management. 2009:32(3);188‐196<br />

• Cooley WC, McAll<strong>is</strong>ter JW, Sherrieb K, Kulthau K. Improved Chronic Condition Outcomes<br />

Associated with <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> Implementation in Pediatric Primary Care. Pediatrics.<br />

2009:358‐364<br />

• Antonelli RW, McAll<strong>is</strong>ter JW, Popp J. Developing Care Coordination as a Critical Component<br />

of a High Per<strong>for</strong>mance Pediatric Health Care System. A Commonwealth Fund Report. 2009<br />

(www.commonwealthfund.org)<br />

• McAll<strong>is</strong>ter JW, Presler E, Cooley WC. Practice‐Based Care Coordination: A <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong><br />

Essential. Pediatrics. 2007;120;e723‐e733.<br />

• Cooley WC, McAll<strong>is</strong>ter JW. Building <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong>s: Improvement Strategies in Primary<br />

Care <strong>for</strong> Children with Special Health Care Needs Needs. Pediatrics Pediatrics. 2004;113:1499 2004;113:1499‐1506 1506<br />

• Cooley WC, McAll<strong>is</strong>ter JW, Sherrieb K, Clark RE. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> Index: Development<br />

<strong>and</strong> Validation of a New Practice‐level Measure of Implementation of the <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong><br />

Model. Ambulatory Pediatrics. 2003:3(4);173‐180<br />

• AAP/MCHB BBuilding ildi YYour Mdi <strong>Medical</strong> lH<strong>Home</strong> TToolkit. lkit www.pediatricsmedhome.org<br />

di t i dh


<strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s: Health<br />

Promotion/D<strong>is</strong>ease<br />

<strong>Prevention</strong> in the <strong>Medical</strong><br />

<strong>Home</strong><br />

At the heart of the medical home <strong>is</strong> the<br />

relationship between the clinician <strong>and</strong> the<br />

ffamily l or youthh


<strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s: Guidelines <strong>for</strong> Health<br />

Superv<strong>is</strong>ion of Infants, Children, <strong>and</strong><br />

Adolescents, 3rd Edition<br />

Paula Duncan, MD, FAAP<br />

AMCHP Annual Meeting<br />

February 2011


H<strong>is</strong>tory of the <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s Guidelines<br />

Supported <strong>and</strong> funded by the Maternal <strong>and</strong> Child Health<br />

Bureau (MCHB) of the Health Resources <strong>and</strong> Services<br />

Admin<strong>is</strong>tration (<strong>HRSA</strong>), Department of Health <strong>and</strong> Human<br />

Services<br />

• First publ<strong>is</strong>hed in 1994<br />

• Updated in 2000—2nd edition<br />

• In 2002, AAP selected by MCHB to implement the next<br />

phase of the initiative<br />

• 3rd edition released in October 2007<br />

• In 2007, the AAP was awarded a second cooperative<br />

agreement to address implementation.


Development p of<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s Guidelines, 3 rd Ed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> M<strong>is</strong>sion<br />

– Develop one set of uni<strong>for</strong>m guidelines <strong>for</strong> the health<br />

superv<strong>is</strong>ion/well care of infants infants, children children, adolescents<br />

<strong>and</strong> young adults<br />

– Address biopsychosocial <strong>is</strong>sues impacting on child<br />

health<br />

– Strengthen medical homes<br />

– Use interventions which are evidence driven<br />

– Include recommendations on immunizations, routine<br />

health screening, <strong>and</strong> anticipatory guidance


Development p of<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s Guidelines, 3 rd Ed.<br />

• Our process<br />

– 4 Multid<strong>is</strong>ciplinary Age‐Stage Expert Panels<br />

• IInfancy f<br />

• Early Childhood<br />

• Middl Middle Childh Childhoodd<br />

• Adolescence<br />

– Numerous AAP Leadership Groups Groups, including the AAP<br />

Committee on Practice <strong>and</strong> Ambulatory Medicine<br />

(co‐authors (co authors of the AAP Periodicity Schedule)


Development p of<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s Guidelines, 3 rd Ed.<br />

• Our process<br />

– Evidence Panel<br />

• NNominated i d<strong>and</strong> d SSelected l d<br />

• Worked with each age/stage panel<br />

– Child Children <strong>and</strong> d Youth Y thWith With Special S i lH Health lthCCare NNeeds d<br />

Panel<br />

• Nominated <strong>and</strong> Selected<br />

• Worked with each age/stage panel


2000 & 2002<br />

…<strong>is</strong> a set of principles,<br />

strategies <strong>and</strong> tools that<br />

are th theory ‐ bbased, d<br />

evidence ‐ driven, <strong>and</strong><br />

systems y ‐ oriented, , that<br />

can be used to improve<br />

the health <strong>and</strong> well‐<br />

being of all children<br />

through culturally<br />

appropriate pp p<br />

interventions that<br />

address the current <strong>and</strong><br />

emerging health<br />

promotion needs at the<br />

family, clinical practice,<br />

community, health<br />

system <strong>and</strong> policy levels.


HHealth lthCCare Re<strong>for</strong>m Rf<br />

•“With “ respect to infants, children, <strong>and</strong> adolescents,<br />

evidence‐in<strong>for</strong>med preventive care <strong>and</strong> screenings<br />

provided <strong>for</strong> in the comprehensive guidelines supported<br />

by the Health Resources <strong>and</strong> Services Admin<strong>is</strong>tration<br />

(<strong>HRSA</strong>).” (<strong>HRSA</strong>).<br />

•Recognizes that <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong> Health Superv<strong>is</strong>ion V<strong>is</strong>its<br />

are the guidelines g referred to as “Recommended<br />

Guidelines”


Developing the Guidelines<br />

• Structure<br />

– Part I—<strong>The</strong>mes<br />

– Includes 10 chapters highlighting key health promotion<br />

themes<br />

– Emphasizes “significant challenges”—mental health<br />

<strong>and</strong> healthy weight<br />

– Part II—V<strong>is</strong>its<br />

– Provides detailed health superv<strong>is</strong>ion guidance <strong>and</strong><br />

anticipatory guidance <strong>for</strong> 31 age‐specific v<strong>is</strong>its<br />

– L<strong>is</strong>ts 5 priorities <strong>for</strong> each v<strong>is</strong>it<br />

– Includes sample questions <strong>and</strong> d<strong>is</strong>cussion topics <strong>for</strong><br />

parent <strong>and</strong> child


Developing the Guidelines<br />

• Health ea t Superv<strong>is</strong>ion Supe s o Priorities o tes<br />

– Designed to focus v<strong>is</strong>it on most important <strong>is</strong>sues <strong>for</strong><br />

age of child<br />

– AAnticipatory i i guidance id presented d in i several l ways<br />

– Include health r<strong>is</strong>ks, developmental <strong>is</strong>sues, positive<br />

rein<strong>for</strong>cement


PPeriodicity i di it Schedule<br />

Shdl


Setting the<br />

agenda<br />

M<strong>Medical</strong> di l<br />

Screening<br />

Developmental<br />

p<br />

Surveillance


Vermont Child Health Improvement Project<br />

Let’s ’ think about Samantha <strong>and</strong> Tiffany<br />

• Samantha age 22 <strong>and</strong> Tiffany age 18 months have been<br />

living in the shelter <strong>for</strong> about four months<br />

• Lived with mom but left abruptly<br />

• Doesn’t Doesn t follow through with finding childcare <strong>for</strong> Tiffany<br />

•Has a boyfriend who lives with h<strong>is</strong> mom


Vermont Child Health Improvement Project<br />

Worried about<br />

additional shots<br />

shots<br />

because<br />

boyfriend boyfriend’s s<br />

mother had a<br />

child with aut<strong>is</strong>m<br />

<strong>The</strong>re <strong>is</strong> a family from<br />

Laos at the homeless<br />

shelter; h lt child hild had hdb been<br />

playing with their<br />

children


Vermont Child Health Improvement Project<br />

• Helps out at the shelter with reading‐<br />

went to the h lib library to get the h bbooks k<br />

(Helps out)<br />

• WWants t to t hhave hher ddaughter ht grow up always l ffeeling li<br />

safe <strong>and</strong> smoke‐ free ( independent dec<strong>is</strong>ion‐making<br />

• Fin<strong>is</strong>hed her GED GED, works as a waitress waitress, never<br />

interacted with an agency be<strong>for</strong>e (Mastery)<br />

• Has a partner who has been with her <strong>and</strong> Samantha<br />

<strong>for</strong> 6 months – lives with h<strong>is</strong> parents (Belonging)


<strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s Implementation<br />

• <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s Guidelines, 3 d rd Edition<br />

– Implementation<br />

– MMeasurement of f Bih <strong>Bright</strong> F<strong>Future</strong>s.<br />

• BihtF <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s t measures encompass rigorous i national ti l<br />

measures but also integrate the comprehensive<br />

recommendations necessary y to pprovide quality q yp preventive<br />

care.


CDC Domestic D ti Winnable Wi bl Battles Bttl<br />

• Obesity, Nutrition, Physical Activity, <strong>and</strong> Food Safety<br />

• Teen Pregnancy<br />

• Motor Vehicle Injuries<br />

• Tobacco<br />

• HIV<br />

• Healthcare Associated Infections


<strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s Quality Measures Crosswalk


Compar<strong>is</strong>on p of Components p at Baseline<br />

<strong>and</strong> Follow‐up<br />

Perceent<br />

of Childrenn<br />

With Positivve<br />

Result Docuumented<br />

Percent of Children Age 0-5 Years In 15 <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s Training<br />

Intervention Practices With 4 <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s Outcomes Documented<br />

by Chart Review At Baseline <strong>and</strong> Follow-Up<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Preventive<br />

Services<br />

Prompting<br />

System<br />

<strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s Training Intervention Project<br />

Structured<br />

Developmental<br />

Assessment<br />

Special<br />

Healthcare Needs<br />

Identified<br />

Structured<br />

Assessment of<br />

Parent Strengths<br />

<strong>and</strong> Needs<br />

Baseline* Baseline<br />

Follow-Up**


Results from 2009 office intervention( (<br />

VCHIP 2011)<br />

YHII Pre vs. Post Office Based Education Changes<br />

by Training Topic<br />

Percent Change in Rates of Composite<br />

Measures of R<strong>is</strong>ks <strong>and</strong> Strengths


Quality Q yImprovement p in Practice Preventive<br />

Services to Improve Patient Outcomes<br />

Use ex<strong>is</strong>ting mechan<strong>is</strong>ms:<br />

– Maintenance of certification<br />

• AAP chapter p activities<br />

• AAP Education in Quality Improvement in Pediatric<br />

Practice (EQIPP)<br />

• Improvement Partnerships<br />

– Link with National Committee <strong>for</strong> Quality Assurance (NCQA)<br />

medical home scoring <strong>and</strong> reimbursement<br />

– Accreditation Council <strong>for</strong> Graduate <strong>Medical</strong> Education<br />

(ACGME) requirements <strong>for</strong> residency program<br />

– Presentations at partner national meetings


NNew AApproaches h<br />

• National AAP Preventive Services Implementation<br />

Project (Jan –Oct 2011)<br />

– Pediatricians, , family y pphysicians, y , nurse practitioners p ,<br />

physician ass<strong>is</strong>tants,<br />

in<br />

– Rural, urban <strong>and</strong> suburban practices <strong>and</strong> clinics as<br />

well as community health centers <strong>and</strong> the Indian<br />

Health service<br />

• Partner with Health Plan <strong>and</strong> Medicaid QI activities (e.g.<br />

CHIPRA)


RRev<strong>is</strong>ion i i PProcess<br />

• <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong> Guidelines, 3 d rd Edition, Rev<strong>is</strong>ion<br />

– Evidence in USPSTF, CDC Community Guide <strong>and</strong><br />

CCochrane h<br />

– Expert Opinion/Clinical Guidelines that change<br />

Uni Universal ersal or Selective Selecti e Screening<br />

– Implementation Projects Lessons Learned<br />

– RReview i bby EExpert PPanel lCh Chairs i <strong>and</strong> d AAP Eid Evidence<br />

Experts


Rf References<br />

Hagan JF, Shaw JS, Duncan PM, eds. 2008. 2008. <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s:<br />

Guidelines <strong>for</strong> Health Superv<strong>is</strong>ion of Infants, Children <strong>and</strong><br />

Adolescents, Third Edition. Elk Grove Village, IL: American<br />

Academy of Pediatrics<br />

Lannon CM, Flower K, Duncan P, Moore KS, Stuart J, Bassewitz J.<br />

Th <strong>The</strong> BihtF <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s t TTraining i i IIntervention t ti PProject: j t iimplementing l ti<br />

systems to support preventive <strong>and</strong> developmental services in<br />

practice. Pediatrics. 2008;122 e163‐e171<br />

http://www.cdc.gov/about/winnablebattles.htm


Buzz Activity<br />

• What <strong>is</strong> your charge as you underst<strong>and</strong> it in linking<br />

public health <strong>and</strong> primary care?<br />

• What prepares p p yyou<br />

to do th<strong>is</strong>?<br />

• What has been working well in achieving th<strong>is</strong><br />

linkage? g<br />

• How do we replicate these successful strategies?


OOutreach t htto Pi Primary CCare – Si Simple l St Steps<br />

• PPartnerships t hi<br />

• Lunches<br />

• Joint offerings<br />

• Scholarships<br />

• Collaboratives<br />

• Share data<br />

• Share family feedback<br />

• Link coordinators


Outreach to Primary Care<br />

• Various Levels of Quality Improvement, based on<br />

experience i<br />

• Level 1<br />

• Level 2<br />

• Level 3<br />

• Use Quality Improvement Strategies<br />

• Build on the public health model (data‐action–data)<br />

• Adopt or establ<strong>is</strong>h guidelines, (eg <strong>Bright</strong> <strong>Future</strong>s <strong>for</strong><br />

EPSDT )<br />

• Consider partnership with AAP or AAFP chapters <strong>and</strong><br />

medical schools


Outreach to Primary Care<br />

• Use <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> Payment Re<strong>for</strong>m Incentives<br />

– In some states payment re<strong>for</strong>m has been linked to<br />

recognition under the NCQA PCMH st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />

– Other states are using unique scoring systems.<br />

– Some are not pursuing payment re<strong>for</strong>m at th<strong>is</strong> time.


Outreach to Primary Care<br />

• For Pediatricians, the use of new 2010 Maintenance<br />

of Certification (MOC) requirements <strong>is</strong> an incentive<br />

– Consider partnership with AAP chapter <strong>and</strong> medical school<br />

to develop <strong>and</strong> submit an MOC application to the<br />

American Board of Pediatrics<br />

– Topics: medical home home, preventive services services, obesity obesity,<br />

developmental screening, asthma, etc.<br />

– Need 40 points


Outreach to Primary Care<br />

• Choice<br />

• True partnership with respect<br />

• Willingness to try something new (co‐location)<br />

• Easy as possible<br />

• Find a champion/partner<br />

p /p<br />

• Look <strong>for</strong> flexibility in practice/clinic structure<br />

• Celebrate small steps


Outreach to Primary Care<br />

• Accelerate the Process<br />

– Consider AAP <strong>and</strong> AAFP chapter grants on shared<br />

outcomes<br />

– Form an Improvement Partnership (Paula)


Improvement Partnership<br />

…a durable, regional collaboration of public <strong>and</strong> private<br />

…a durable, regional collaboration of public <strong>and</strong> private<br />

partners that uses measurement‐based ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>and</strong> a<br />

systems approach to improve the quality of children’s<br />

health care.


Why are States Developing Improvement<br />

Partnerships?<br />

• Investments in improving the health care of children<br />

• Recognition <strong>and</strong> embracing the local expert<strong>is</strong>e – “all<br />

improvement p <strong>is</strong> local”<br />

• Innovation <strong>and</strong> success in the State <strong>is</strong> often not<br />

connected nor broadly y d<strong>is</strong>seminated, limiting g the<br />

impact on child health outcomes


VERMONT CHILD HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM<br />

.<br />

<strong>The</strong> OKlahoma Key<br />

to Improving<br />

Developmental-<br />

Behavioral Services


What Do Improvement Partnerships Do?<br />

• Develop p <strong>and</strong> test tools, , measures <strong>and</strong> strategies g<br />

• Serve as a resource <strong>for</strong> improvement ass<strong>is</strong>tance<br />

• Translate knowledge g through g engagement gg of<br />

national <strong>and</strong> local experts<br />

• D<strong>is</strong>seminate findings, spreading successful<br />

approaches h <strong>and</strong> d iin<strong>for</strong>ming f i policy li<br />

• Serve as convener, “honest broker”


AZ<br />

NM<br />

VT<br />

UT<br />

WV<br />

• Convener <strong>for</strong> the States<br />

• Sharing, problem solving <strong>and</strong><br />

connecting states/regions<br />

• Repository <strong>for</strong> tools, materials,<br />

speakers<br />

RI<br />

WA<br />

NY<br />

OR<br />

CT<br />

MI • Tech ass<strong>is</strong>tance/Mentor<br />

‐ developing an IP<br />

OK<br />

MN<br />

• Adv<strong>is</strong>ory to federal government<br />

<strong>and</strong> other national initiatives<br />

• Scholarship ‐ publ<strong>is</strong>hing results<br />

• Shaping funding opportunities<br />

DC<br />

OH


Six Core Outcomes (Charge to All of US)<br />

• Children will be screened early <strong>and</strong> continuously <strong>for</strong><br />

special health care need<br />

• Families of CSHCN will participate in dec<strong>is</strong>ion making at<br />

all levels <strong>and</strong> will be sat<strong>is</strong>fied with the services they<br />

receive<br />

• CSHCN will receive regular ongoing comprehensive care<br />

within a medical home.<br />

• Families of CSHCN will have adequate public <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

private insurance to pay <strong>for</strong> the services they need.<br />

• Community‐based service systems will be organized so<br />

families can use them easily<br />

• Youth with special health care needs (YSHCN) will receive<br />

the services necessary to make transitions to all aspects<br />

of adult life life.


Break 10"<br />

D<strong>is</strong>cussion Groups:<br />

Family Engagement<br />

Care Coordination


Family Engagement<br />

• Title V /state level<br />

– Support practice /clinic level data collection <strong>and</strong><br />

improvement activties<br />

– Provide tools. Analyze data<br />

– Materials <strong>and</strong> strategies <strong>for</strong> improvement<br />

– Parent adv<strong>is</strong>ory committee or members on all<br />

committees<br />

– Employ parents as team professionals<br />

– Support parent to parent groups


Family Engagement<br />

• At the medical home level<br />

– Share materials that involve parents in the v<strong>is</strong>it<br />

• prev<strong>is</strong>it questionnaires<br />

• Prev<strong>is</strong>it developmental screening tools<br />

• H<strong>and</strong>outs<br />

– Consider shared documentation <strong>for</strong>ms<br />

– Survey data from parents (PHDS)<br />

– Parents/youth practice adv<strong>is</strong>ory committee<br />

– Employ parents as navigators <strong>and</strong> parent adv<strong>is</strong>ors


<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> Index Family y<br />

Involvement –Care Coordination<br />

• Asked what care supports parents need <strong>and</strong> shared<br />

dec<strong>is</strong>ions<br />

• Given option of centralizing care coordination<br />

• Involved with care coordinator


Family Feedback Organizational Capacity<br />

• Elicited individually <strong>and</strong> shared with others<br />

• SSurveys, ffocus groups, iinterviews i<br />

• Tan ible s pports in pla e <strong>for</strong> parents to parti ipate<br />

• Tangible supports in place <strong>for</strong> parents to participate<br />

in practice needs assessment <strong>and</strong> solutions


Family Engagement – D<strong>is</strong>cussion<br />

• How do you involve families <strong>and</strong> MCH at the state<br />

<strong>and</strong> local level?<br />

• How do you encourage medical homes to involve<br />

families?


Care Coordination<br />

• Public health <strong>and</strong> the medical home<br />

– Care Coordination


<strong>The</strong> Primary Care <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong><br />

At the Crossroads Integrating:<br />

• Vertically –among health care systems/special<strong>is</strong>ts/PCPs/families<br />

• HHorizontally i ll – among ffamilies/community ili / i agencies/schools i / h l etc …<br />

• Longitudinally –over time<br />

• Continuously – continuity of provider <strong>and</strong> team<br />

Community Co u ty<br />

Resources/Policies<br />

Health<br />

System<br />

<strong>Medical</strong><br />

<strong>Home</strong><br />

Continuously… i l<br />

Longitudinally….<br />

Opportunities <strong>and</strong> need <strong>for</strong> care coordination functions/care coordinators.


CMWF Framework Framework—AA Definition<br />

• Care coordination <strong>is</strong> a patient p <strong>and</strong><br />

family‐centered, assessment driven,<br />

team‐based activity …<br />

– …designed d i dto meet the h needs d of f children, hild youth h <strong>and</strong> d adults d l<br />

while enhancing the care giving capabilities of families.<br />

– …care coordination addresses interrelated medical, social,<br />

developmental, behavioral, educational <strong>and</strong> financial needs<br />

in order to achieve optimal health <strong>and</strong> wellness outcomes<br />

Antonelli, McAll<strong>is</strong>ter, Popp, 2009


Components of CC<br />

• Patient & Family‐centered y<br />

• Community‐based<br />

• Proactive, Providing Planned, Comprehensive Care<br />

• Promotes the Development of Self‐Management<br />

Skills (Care Partnership Support) with Children,<br />

Youth, Adults <strong>and</strong> Families<br />

• Facilitates cross‐organizational linkages <strong>and</strong><br />

relationships<br />

Antonelli Antonelli, McAll<strong>is</strong>ter, McAll<strong>is</strong>ter Popp, Popp 2009


Delivery of Patient & Family‐Centered Care Coordination Services


CC Functions<br />

• Provides separate CC v<strong>is</strong>its<br />

• CCompletes/analyzes l / l assessments<br />

• Manages continuous communications<br />

• Develops care plans with patients/families<br />

• Manages/tracks tests, referrals, <strong>and</strong> outcomes<br />

• Coaches patients/families<br />

p /<br />

• Integrates/consolidates critical care in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

• Supports/facilitates care transitions (pedi, adult,<br />

nursing i hhome, hospital, h it l etc.) t )<br />

• Facilitates (participates in) team meetings<br />

• Uses health in<strong>for</strong>mation technology (IT)


Our <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> Until<br />

1:30 p.m. 2/15/01<br />

Support<br />

Family &<br />

Friends<br />

FAMILY<br />

MEDICALHOME<br />

PRIMARY DOCTOR<br />

CARE COORDINATOR*<br />

DAYCARE


And <strong>The</strong>n… <strong>The</strong>n Along Came <strong>The</strong><br />

Amazing M<strong>is</strong>s Kate<br />

Congenital<br />

Hydrocephalus<br />

Multiple rev<strong>is</strong>ions,<br />

infections,<br />

complications<br />

Cerebral Palsy,<br />

Epilepsy l<br />

Downright remarkable


Our <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong><br />

Post Diagnos<strong>is</strong><br />

1:35 pm 2/15/01<br />

SUPPORTS<br />

Family,<br />

Friends,<br />

Respite<br />

Advocacy<br />

HOME CARE<br />

SPECIALISTS<br />

Hospital<br />

FAMILY<br />

MEDICALHOME<br />

PRIMARY DOCTOR<br />

CARE COORDINATOR<br />

On-Going Care Team<br />

Social Worker<br />

OT/PT/SLP <strong>The</strong>rap<strong>is</strong>ts<br />

Daycare Staff & Aide<br />

EDUCATION<br />

EI, Preschool<br />

School School, Work<br />

AGENCIES<br />

CSHCN<br />

Clinics<br />

Equipment<br />

FUNDING


Care Coordination ‐ D<strong>is</strong>cussion<br />

• What <strong>is</strong> your public health charge related to care<br />

coordination?<br />

• How do you y provide p care coordination<br />

services/resources to primary care?<br />

• What strategies/tools work well to integrate current<br />

g g<br />

care coordination ef<strong>for</strong>ts?


Right about now?


Strengths – National, Local<br />

• <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong> fervor f<br />

– Care Coordination Integral to <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong><br />

• Pockets of Organization <strong>and</strong> Ef<strong>for</strong>t<br />

– E.g. 28 Care Coordinators in th<strong>is</strong> DHMC ef<strong>for</strong>t!<br />

– 40+ PPOC in Boston<br />

• CMHI began in 1997 with few (4) practices<br />

• You bring (or how can you bring your):<br />

– Skills, personal <strong>and</strong> professional experience, continuous learning<br />

interest, , adaptable/flexible p / approach, pp , enthusiasm, , ability y to pull p ppeople p<br />

together <strong>and</strong> be peacekeepers, ability to make the in<strong>for</strong>mation flow<br />

(communication, communication…), collaborative nature, advocacy,<br />

willingness to teach others, out of box thinking <strong>and</strong> more!


What Are Your Best Strategies to Partner<br />

With Primary Care <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Home</strong>s –<br />

Individual or Group p Of?<br />

• BEST IDEAS?<br />

– Link coordinators<br />

– Lunch <strong>and</strong> learn<br />

– Resource contact people<br />

– Facilitate a team wrap around meeting<br />

• Help with care plans, insurance other….<br />

• Worries?<br />

• What supports you?<br />

• Who can you partner with?


Some Tools <strong>for</strong> Delivery<br />

• www.medicalhomeimprovement.org<br />

p g<br />

• www.Gottransition.org<br />

• Framework Link (www.commonwealthfund.org)<br />

• www.medicalhomeinfo.org <strong>and</strong> www.pediatricmedhome.org<br />

– Care Coordination Assessment (adult/pedi)<br />

– Complexity/Acuity<br />

– Planned Care:<br />

• Care Plans/Care Plan Oversight (have)<br />

• PreV<strong>is</strong>it Contact<br />

• Community resources (starter sheet adult/pedi)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!