21.08.2013 Views

Rotationally Invariant Descriptors using Intensity Order ... - IEEE Xplore

Rotationally Invariant Descriptors using Intensity Order ... - IEEE Xplore

Rotationally Invariant Descriptors using Intensity Order ... - IEEE Xplore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication.<br />

<strong>IEEE</strong> TRANSACTION ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE 10<br />

pooling local features according to intensity orders. The proposed two descriptors are not only<br />

inherently rotation invariant, but also more distinctive than state-of-the-art local descriptors as<br />

shown by experiments in Section V.<br />

recall<br />

recall<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

New York 1 V 5<br />

Ori−DAISY<br />

DAISY<br />

Ori−SIFT<br />

SIFT<br />

0<br />

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7<br />

1−precision<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

(a) 45 o rotation<br />

ubc 1 V 6<br />

0.2<br />

Ori−DAISY<br />

DAISY<br />

0.1<br />

Ori−SIFT<br />

SIFT<br />

0<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1<br />

1−precision<br />

(d) JPEG compression<br />

recall<br />

recall<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

boat 1 V 3<br />

Ori−DAISY<br />

DAISY<br />

Ori−SIFT<br />

SIFT<br />

0<br />

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4<br />

1−precision<br />

0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8<br />

(b) 40 o rotation + 0.75 scale changes<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

bikes 1 V 6<br />

0<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1<br />

1−precision<br />

(e) image blur<br />

Ori−DAISY<br />

DAISY<br />

Ori−SIFT<br />

SIFT<br />

recall<br />

recall<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

EAST PARK 0 V 3<br />

Ori−DAISY<br />

DAISY<br />

Ori−SIFT<br />

SIFT<br />

0<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1<br />

1−precision<br />

(c) 50 o rotation + 0.6 scale changes<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

leuven 1 V 6<br />

Ori−DAISY<br />

DAISY<br />

Ori−SIFT<br />

SIFT<br />

0<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1<br />

1−precision<br />

(f) illumination change<br />

Fig. 3. Image matching results of SIFT and DAISY with two different orientation assignment methods. See text for details.<br />

IV. THE PROPOSED METHOD<br />

The key idea of our method is to pool rotation invariant local features based on intensity orders.<br />

Instead of assigning a reference orientation to each interest point to make the computation of local<br />

features rotation invariant, we calculate local features in a locally rotation invariant coordinate<br />

system. Thus they are inherently rotation invariant. Meanwhile, sample points are adaptively<br />

partitioned into several groups based on their intensity orders. Then the rotation invariant local<br />

November 26, 2011 DRAFT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!