20.08.2013 Views

Recording Handbook - Hol.gr

Recording Handbook - Hol.gr

Recording Handbook - Hol.gr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MICROPHONE PATTERNS<br />

These are polar <strong>gr</strong>aphs of the output produced vs. the angle of the sound source. The output is represented<br />

by the radius of the curve at the incident angle.<br />

Omni<br />

The simplest mic design will pick up all sound, regardless of its point of origin, and is thus known as an<br />

omnidirectional microphone. They are very easy to use and generally have good to outstanding frequency<br />

response. To see how these patterns are produced, here's a sidebar on directioal microphones.<br />

Bi-directional<br />

It is not very difficult to produce a pickup pattern that accepts sound striking the front or rear of the<br />

diaphragm, but does not respond to sound from the sides. This is the way any diaphragm will behave if<br />

sound can strike the front and back equally. The rejection of undesired sound is the best achievable with<br />

any design, but the fact that the mic accepts sound from both ends makes it difficult to use in many<br />

situations. Most often it is placed above an instrument. Frequency response is just as good as an omni, at<br />

least for sounds that are not too close to the microphone.<br />

Cardioid<br />

This pattern is popular for sound reinforcement or recording concerts where audience noise is a possible<br />

problem. The concept is <strong>gr</strong>eat, a mic that picks up sounds it is pointed at. The reality is different. The first<br />

problem is that sounds from the back are not completely rejected, but merely reduced about 10-30 dB.<br />

This can surprise careless users. The second problem, and a severe one, is that the actual shape of the<br />

pickup pattern varies with frequency. For low frequencies, this is an omnidirectional microphone. A mic<br />

that is directional in the range of bass instruments will be fairly large and expensive. Furthermore, the<br />

frequency response for signals arriving from the back and sides will be uneven; this adds an undesired<br />

coloration to instruments at the edge of a large ensemble, or to the reverberation of the concert hall.<br />

A third effect, which may be a problem or may be a desired feature, is that the microphone will emphasize<br />

the low frequency components of any source that is very close to the diaphragm. This is known as the<br />

"proximity effect", and many singers and radio announcers rely on it to add "chest" to a basically light<br />

voice. Close, in this context, is related to the size of the microphone, so the nice large mics with even back<br />

and side frequency response exhibit the strongest presence effect. Most cardioid mics have a built in<br />

lowcut filter switch to compensate for proximity. Missetting that switch can cause hilarious results.<br />

Bidirectional mics also exhibit this phenomenon.<br />

Tighter Patterns<br />

It is posible to exaggerate the directionality of cardioid type microphones, if you don't mind exaggerating<br />

some of the problems. The Hypercardioid pattern is very popular, as it gives a better overall rejection and<br />

25<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!