18.08.2013 Views

Entire Book - Southwest Consortium for Environmental Research ...

Entire Book - Southwest Consortium for Environmental Research ...

Entire Book - Southwest Consortium for Environmental Research ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Snapshot of the Border<br />

Interestingly, the peak of the EKC is estimated to be between<br />

a per capita income of $5,000 and $8,000, which means<br />

Mexican per capita income is such that economic development<br />

is associated with improvements in air and water quality.<br />

Moreover, as Mexico moves further along the EKC, Mexican and<br />

U.S. preferences <strong>for</strong> improved air quality should converge.<br />

1 See, <strong>for</strong> example, Grossman and Krueger 1995; Wheeler 2001; Cole, et al.<br />

1997; and Hettige, et al. 2000. For evidence contradicting the EKC hypothesis<br />

see Stern, et al. 2001.<br />

POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT<br />

Perhaps the most significant stressor on the environment is human<br />

population, so understanding border population trends is useful in<br />

determining the environmental pressures faced by the border. Table<br />

2 reports population statistics <strong>for</strong> 1990 and 2000 <strong>for</strong> the largest border<br />

cities and <strong>for</strong> the overall border. Also included <strong>for</strong> comparison<br />

are figures <strong>for</strong> Mexico and the United States as a whole. According<br />

to the 2000 census, the largest U.S. city on the border was San<br />

Diego (about 2.8 million), followed by El Paso (about 680,000).<br />

The largest Mexican cities are Ciudad Juárez (1.3 million) and<br />

Tijuana (1.2 million). Looking at combined populations, the largest<br />

twin cities are San Diego-Tijuana (slightly more than 4 million) and<br />

El Paso-Ciudad Juárez (slightly less than 2 million). These large<br />

cities have stressed the border environment in general and air quality<br />

in particular.<br />

Population growth along the U.S.-Mexican border has varied<br />

(Table 3). On the U.S. side, the border population grew by 21%<br />

between the 1990 census and 2000 census, compared to 13% <strong>for</strong> the<br />

United States as a whole. McAllen was the fastest growing city<br />

(48%), followed by Laredo (45%). The only two U.S. border cities<br />

to lag behind the U.S. average population growth were San Diego<br />

(13%) and El Paso (15%). Population growth in Mexico is even<br />

more dramatic. Total Mexican border population grew by 43%<br />

between 1990 and 2000 while the overall population of Mexico<br />

increased by 20%. The Mexican cities with the most rapid growth<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!