Entire Book - Southwest Consortium for Environmental Research ...
Entire Book - Southwest Consortium for Environmental Research ...
Entire Book - Southwest Consortium for Environmental Research ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A Snapshot of the Border<br />
Interestingly, the peak of the EKC is estimated to be between<br />
a per capita income of $5,000 and $8,000, which means<br />
Mexican per capita income is such that economic development<br />
is associated with improvements in air and water quality.<br />
Moreover, as Mexico moves further along the EKC, Mexican and<br />
U.S. preferences <strong>for</strong> improved air quality should converge.<br />
1 See, <strong>for</strong> example, Grossman and Krueger 1995; Wheeler 2001; Cole, et al.<br />
1997; and Hettige, et al. 2000. For evidence contradicting the EKC hypothesis<br />
see Stern, et al. 2001.<br />
POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT<br />
Perhaps the most significant stressor on the environment is human<br />
population, so understanding border population trends is useful in<br />
determining the environmental pressures faced by the border. Table<br />
2 reports population statistics <strong>for</strong> 1990 and 2000 <strong>for</strong> the largest border<br />
cities and <strong>for</strong> the overall border. Also included <strong>for</strong> comparison<br />
are figures <strong>for</strong> Mexico and the United States as a whole. According<br />
to the 2000 census, the largest U.S. city on the border was San<br />
Diego (about 2.8 million), followed by El Paso (about 680,000).<br />
The largest Mexican cities are Ciudad Juárez (1.3 million) and<br />
Tijuana (1.2 million). Looking at combined populations, the largest<br />
twin cities are San Diego-Tijuana (slightly more than 4 million) and<br />
El Paso-Ciudad Juárez (slightly less than 2 million). These large<br />
cities have stressed the border environment in general and air quality<br />
in particular.<br />
Population growth along the U.S.-Mexican border has varied<br />
(Table 3). On the U.S. side, the border population grew by 21%<br />
between the 1990 census and 2000 census, compared to 13% <strong>for</strong> the<br />
United States as a whole. McAllen was the fastest growing city<br />
(48%), followed by Laredo (45%). The only two U.S. border cities<br />
to lag behind the U.S. average population growth were San Diego<br />
(13%) and El Paso (15%). Population growth in Mexico is even<br />
more dramatic. Total Mexican border population grew by 43%<br />
between 1990 and 2000 while the overall population of Mexico<br />
increased by 20%. The Mexican cities with the most rapid growth<br />
29