18.08.2013 Views

2008 edition - Fort Sam Houston - U.S. Army

2008 edition - Fort Sam Houston - U.S. Army

2008 edition - Fort Sam Houston - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

R.C.M. 307(c)(5)<br />

j o i n t o f f e n s e s t h e p a r t i c i p a n t s m a y b e s e p a r a t e l y o r j o i n t l y<br />

charged. However, if the participants are members of different<br />

armed forces, they must be charged separately because their trials<br />

must be separately reviewed. The preparation of joint charges is<br />

discussed in subsection (c)(3) Discussion (H) (viii)(a) of this rule.<br />

The advantage of a joint charge is that all accused will be tried at<br />

one trial, thereby saving time, labor, and expense. This must be<br />

weighed against the possible unfairness to the accused which may<br />

result if their defenses are inconsistent or antagonistic. An accused<br />

cannot be called as a witness except upon that accused’s<br />

own request. If the testimony of an accomplice is necessary, the<br />

accomplice should not be tried jointly with those against whom<br />

the accomplice is expected to testify. See also Mil. R. Evid. 306.<br />

See R.C.M. 603 concerning amending specifications.<br />

See R.C.M. 906(b)(5) and (6) concerning motions to amend<br />

specifications and bills of particulars.<br />

(d) Harmless error in citation. Error in or omission<br />

of the designation of the article of the code or other<br />

statute, law of war, or regulation violated shall not<br />

be ground for dismissal of a charge or reversal of a<br />

conviction if the error or omission did not prejudicially<br />

mislead the accused.<br />

II-30<br />

Rule 308. Notification to accused of charges<br />

( a ) I m m e d i a t e c o m m a n d e r . T h e i m m e d i a t e c o m -<br />

mander of the accused shall cause the accused to be<br />

informed of the charges preferred against the accused,<br />

and the name of the person who preferred the<br />

charges and of any person who ordered the charges<br />

to be preferred, if known, as soon as practicable.<br />

Discussion<br />

When notice is given, a certificate to that effect on the Charge<br />

Sheet should be completed. See Appendix 4.<br />

(b) Commanders at higher echelons. When the accused<br />

has not been informed of the charges, commanders<br />

at higher echelons to whom the preferred<br />

charges are forwarded shall cause the accused to be<br />

informed of the matters required under subsection<br />

(a) of this rule as soon as practicable.<br />

(c) Remedy. The sole remedy for violation of this<br />

rule is a continuance or recess of sufficient length to<br />

permit the accused to adequately prepare a defense,<br />

and no relief shall be granted upon a failure to<br />

comply with this rule unless the accused demonstrates<br />

that the accused has been hindered in the<br />

preparation of a defense.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!