18.08.2013 Views

2008 edition - Fort Sam Houston - U.S. Army

2008 edition - Fort Sam Houston - U.S. Army

2008 edition - Fort Sam Houston - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pun. Art. 119 APPENDIX 23<br />

slaughter. See United States v. Emmons, 31 M.J. 108 (C.M.A.<br />

1990).<br />

45. Article 120— Rape, sexual assault, and other<br />

sexual misconduct<br />

b. Elements. 2004 Amendment: Paragraph 45(b)(2) was amended<br />

to add two distinct elements of age based upon the 1994 amendment<br />

to paragraph 45(e). See also concurrent change to R.C.M.<br />

307(c)(3) and accompanying analysis.<br />

c. Explanation. This paragraph is based on paragraph 199 of<br />

MCM, 1969 (Rev.). The third paragraph of paragraph 199(a) was<br />

deleted as unnecessary. The third paragraph of paragraph 199(b)<br />

was deleted based on the preemption doctrine. See United States<br />

v. Wright, 5 M.J. 106 (C.M.A. 1978); United States v. Norris, 2<br />

U.S.C.M.A. 236, 8 C.M.R. 36 (1953). Cf. Williams v. United<br />

States, 327 U.S. 711 (1946) (scope of preemption doctrine). The<br />

Military Rules of Evidence deleted the requirement for corroboration<br />

of the victim’s testimony in rape and similar cases under<br />

former paragraph 153 a of MCM, 1969. See Analysis, Mil. R.<br />

Evid. 412.<br />

d. Lesser included offenses. Carnal knowledge was deleted as a<br />

lesser included offense of rape in view of the separate elements in<br />

each offense. Both should be separately pleaded in a proper case.<br />

See generally United States v. Smith , 7 M.J. 842 (A.C.M.R.<br />

1979).<br />

1993 Amendment. The amendment to para 45 d(1) represents<br />

an administrative change to conform the Manual with case authority.<br />

Carnal knowledge is a lesser included offense of rape<br />

where the pleading alleges that the victim has not attained the age<br />

of 16 years. See United States v. Baker, 28 M.J. 900 (A.C.M.R.<br />

1989); United States v. Stratton, 12 M.J. 998 (A.F.C.M.R. 1982),<br />

pet. denied, 15 M.J. 107 (C.M.A. 1983); United States v. Smith, 7<br />

M.J. 842 (A.C.M.R. 1979).<br />

e. Maximum punishment.<br />

1994 Amendment. Subparagraph e was amended by creating<br />

two distinct categories of carnal knowledge for sentencing purposes<br />

-- one involving children who had attained the age of 12<br />

years at the time of the offense, now designated as subparagraph<br />

e(2), and the other for those who were younger than 12 years.<br />

The latter is now designated as subparagraph e(3). The punishment<br />

for the older children was increased from 15 to 20 years<br />

confinement. The maximum confinement for carnal knowledge of<br />

a child under 12 years was increased to life. The purpose for<br />

these changes is to bring the punishments more in line with those<br />

for sodomy of a child under paragraph 51e of this part and with<br />

the Sexual Abuse Act of 1986, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2241–2245. The<br />

alignment of the maximum punishments for carnal knowledge<br />

with those of sodomy is aimed at paralleling the concept of<br />

gender–neutrality incorporated into the Sexual Abuse Act.<br />

1995 Amendment. The offense of rape was made gender neutral<br />

and the spousal exception was removed under Article 120(a).<br />

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993, Pub. L.<br />

No. 102–484, 106 Stat. 2315, 2506 (1992).<br />

Rape may “be punished by death” only if constitutionally permissible.<br />

In Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977), the Court<br />

held that the death penalty is “grossly disproportionate and excess<br />

i v e p u n i s h m e n t f o r t h e r a p e o f a n a d u l t w o m a n , ” a n d i s<br />

“therefore forbidden by the Eighth Amendment as cruel and unu-<br />

A23-14<br />

sual punishment.” Id. at 592 (plurality opinion). Coker, however,<br />

leaves open the question of whether it is permissible to impose<br />

the death penalty for the rape of a minor by an adult. See Coker,<br />

433 U.S. at 595. See Leatherwood v. State, 548 So.2d 389 (Miss.<br />

1989) (death sentence for rape of minor by an adult is not cruel<br />

and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth Amendment).<br />

But see Buford v. State, 403 So.2d 943 (Fla. 1981) (sentence of<br />

death is grossly disproportionate for sexual assault of a minor by<br />

an adult and consequently is forbidden by Eighth Amendment as<br />

cruel and unusual punishment).<br />

1998 Amendment: In enacting section 1113 of the National<br />

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-<br />

106, 110 Stat. 186, 462 (1996), Congress amended Article 120,<br />

UCMJ, to make the offense gender neutral and create a mistake<br />

of fact as to age defense to a prosecution for carnal knowledge.<br />

The accused must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that<br />

the person with whom he or she had sexual intercourse was at<br />

least 12 years of age, and that the accused reasonably believed<br />

that this person was at least 16 years of age.<br />

f . S a m p l e S p e c i f i c a t i o n . 2 0 0 4 A m e n d m e n t : P a r a g r a p h 4 5 ( f ) ( 2 )<br />

was amended to aid practitioners in charging the two distinct<br />

categories of carnal knowledge created in 1994. For the same<br />

reason paragraph 45(f)(1) was amended to allow for contingencies<br />

of proof because carnal knowledge is a lesser-included offense<br />

of rape if properly pleaded. See also concurrent change to<br />

R.C.M.307(c)(3) and accompanying analysis.<br />

2007 Amendment: Changes to this paragraph are contained in<br />

Div. A. Title V. Subtitle E, Section 552(a)(1) of the National<br />

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, P.L. 109-163,<br />

119 Stat. 3257 (6 January 2006), which supersedes the previous<br />

paragraph 45, Rape and Carnal Knowledge, in its entirety and<br />

replaces paragraph 45 with Rape, sexual assault and other sexual<br />

misconduct. In accordance with Section 552(c) of that Act, the<br />

amendment to the Article applies only with respect to offenses<br />

committed on or after 1 October 2007.<br />

Nothing in these amendments invalidates any nonjudicial punishment<br />

proceeding, restraint, investigation, referral of charges,<br />

trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action begun prior to<br />

1 October 2007. Any such nonjudical punishment proceeding,<br />

restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment<br />

occurred, or other action may proceed in the same manner<br />

and with the same effect as if these amendments had not been<br />

prescribed.<br />

This new Article 120 consolidates several sexual misconduct<br />

offenses and is generally based on the Sexual Abuse Act of 1986,<br />

18 U.S.C. Sections 2241-2245. The following is a list of offenses<br />

that have been replaced by this new paragraph 45:<br />

(1) Paragraph 63, 134 Assault - Indecent, has been replaced in<br />

its entirety by three new offenses under paragraph 45. See subsections<br />

(e) Aggravated Sexual Contact, (h) Abusive Sexual Contact,<br />

and (m) Wrongful Sexual Contact.<br />

(2) Paragraph 87, 134 Indecent Acts or Liberties with a Child,<br />

has been replaced in its entirety by three new offenses under<br />

paragraph 45. See subsections (g) Aggravated Sexual Contact<br />

with a Child, (i) Abusive Sexual Contact with a Child, and (j)<br />

Indecent Liberty with a Child.<br />

(3) Paragraph 88, Article 134 Indecent Exposure, has been<br />

replaced in its entirety by a new offense under paragraph 45. See<br />

subsection (n) Indecent Exposure.<br />

(4) Paragraph 90, Article 134 Indecent Acts with Another, has

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!