2008 edition - Fort Sam Houston - U.S. Army
2008 edition - Fort Sam Houston - U.S. Army 2008 edition - Fort Sam Houston - U.S. Army
M.R.E. 803(18) t i o n , s t a t e m e n t s c o n t a i n e d i n p u b l i s h e d t r e a t i s e s , periodicals, or pamphlets on a subject of history, medicine or other science or art, established as a reliable authority by the testimony or admission of the witness or by other expert testimony or by judicial notice. If admitted, the statements may be read into evidence but may not be received as exhibits. (19) Reputation concerning personal or family history. Reputation among members of the person’s family by blood, adoption, or marriage, or among the person’s associates, or in the community, concerning the person’s birth, adoption, marriage, div o r c e , d e a t h , l e g i t i m a c y , r e l a t i o n s h i p b y b l o o d , adoption, or marriage, ancestry, or other similar fact of the person’s personal or family history. (20) Reputation concerning boundaries or general history. Reputation in a community, arising before the controversy, as to boundaries of or customs affecting lands in the community, and reputation as to events of general history important to the community or State or nation in which located. (21) Reputation as to character. Reputation of a person’s character among the person’s associates or in the community. (22) Judgment of previous conviction. Evidence of a final judgment, entered after a trial or upon a plea of guilty (but not upon a plea of nolo contendere), adjudging a person guilty of a crime punishable by death, dishonorable discharge, or imprisonment in excess of one year, to prove any fact essential to sustain the judgment, but not including, when offered by the Government for purposes other than impeachment, judgments against persons other than the accused. The pendency of an appeal may be shown but does not affect admissibility. In determining whether a crime tried by court-martial was puni s h a b l e b y d e a t h , d i s h o n o r a b l e d i s c h a r g e , o r imprisonment in excess of one year, the maximum punishment prescribed by the President under Article 56 at the time of the conviction applies without regard to whether the case was tried by general, special, or summary court-martial. (23) Judgment as to personal, family or general history, or boundaries. Judgments as proof of matters of personal, family, or general history, or boundaries essential to the judgment, if the same would be provable by evidence of reputation. (24) Other exceptions. [Transferred to M.R.E. 807] III-42 Rule 804. Hearsay exceptions; declarant unavailable (a) Definitions of unavailability. “Unavailability as a witness” includes situations in which the declarant— (1) is exempted by ruling of the military judge on the ground of privilege from testifying concerning the subject matter of the declarant’s statement; or (2) persists in refusing to testify concerning the subject matter of the declarant’s statement despite an order of the military judge to do so; or (3) testifies to a lack of memory of the subject matter of the declarant’s statement; or (4) is unable to be present or to testify at the hearing because of death or then existing physical or mental illness or infirmity; or (5) is absent from the hearing and the proponent of the declarant’s statement has been unable to procure the declarant’s attendance (or in the case of a hearsay exception under subdivision (b)(2), (3), or ( 4 ) , t h e d e c l a r a n t ’ s a t t e n d a n c e o r t e s t i m o n y ) b y process or other reasonable means; or (6) is unavailable within the meaning of Article 49(d)(2). A declarant is not unavailable as a witness if the d e c l a r a n t ’ s e x e m p t i o n , r e f u s a l , c l a i m o f l a c k o f memory, inability, or absence is due to the procurem e n t o r w r o n g d o i n g o f t h e p r o p o n e n t o f t h e declarant’s statement for the purpose of preventing the witness from attending or testifying. (b) Hearsay exceptions. The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a witness. (1) Former testimony. Testimony given as a witness at another hearing of the same or different proceeding, or in a deposition taken in compliance w i t h l a w i n t h e c o u r s e o f t h e s a m e o r a n o t h e r proceeding, if the party against whom the testimony is now offered had an opportunity and similar motive to develop the testimony by direct, cross, or redirect examination. A record of testimony given b e f o r e c o u r t s - m a r t i a l , c o u r t s o f i n q u i r y , m i l i t a r y c o m m i s s i o n s , o t h e r m i l i t a r y t r i b u n a l s , a n d b e f o r e proceedings pursuant to or equivalent to those required by Article 32 is admissible under this subdivision if such a record is a verbatim record. This paragraph is subject to the limitations set forth in Articles 49 and 50. (2) Statement under belief of impending death. In a prosecution for homicide or for any offense result-
ing in the death of the alleged victim, a statement m a d e b y a d e c l a r a n t w h i l e b e l i e v i n g t h a t t h e d e c l a r a n t ’ s d e a t h w a s i m m i n e n t , c o n c e r n i n g t h e cause or circumstances of what the declarant believed to be the declarant’s impending death. (3) Statement against interest. A statement which was at the time of its making so far contrary to the declarant’s pecuniary or proprietary interest, or so far tended to subject the declarant to civil or criminal liability, or to render invalid a claim by the declarant against another, that a reasonable person in the position of the declarant would not have made the statement unless the person believed it to be true. A statement tending to expose the declarant to criminal liability and offered to exculpate the accused is not admissible unless corroborating circumstances clearly indicate the trustworthiness of the statement. (4) Statement of personal or family history. (A) A s t a t e m e n t c o n c e r n i n g t h e d e c l a r a n t ’ s o w n b i r t h , adoption, marriage, divorce, legitimacy, relationship by blood, adoption, or marriage, ancestry, or other s i m i l a r f a c t o f p e r s o n a l o r f a m i l y h i s t o r y , e v e n though declarant had no means of acquiring personal knowledge of the matter stated; or (B) a statement concerning the foregoing matters, and death also, of another person, if the declarant was related to the other by blood, adoption, or marriage or was so intimately associated with the other’s family as to be likely to have accurate information concerning the matter declared. (5) Other exceptions. [Transferred to M.R.E. 807] ( 6 ) F o r f e i t u r e b y w r o n g d o i n g . A s t a t e m e n t o f - fered against a party that has engaged or acquiesced in wrongdoing that was intended to, and did, procure the unavailability of the declarant as a witness. Rule 805. Hearsay within hearsay Hearsay included within hearsay is not excluded under the hearsay rule if each part of the combined statements conforms with an exception to the hearsay rule provided in these rules. Rule 806. Attacking and supporting credibility of declarant When a hearsay statement, or a statement defined in Mil. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(C), (D), or (E), has been admitted in evidence, the credibility of the declarant may be attacked, and if attacked may be supported, M.R.E. 901(b)(2) b y a n y e v i d e n c e w h i c h w o u l d b e a d m i s s i b l e f o r those purposes if declarant had testified as a witness. Evidence of a statement or conduct by the declarant at any time, inconsistent with the declarant’s hearsay statement, is not subject to any requirement that the declarant may have been afforded an opportunity to deny or explain. If the party against whom a hearsay statement has been admitted calls the declarant as a w i t n e s s , t h e p a r t y i s e n t i t l e d t o e x a m i n e t h e declarant on the statement as if under cross-examination. Rule 807. Residual exception. A statement not specifically covered by Rule 803 or 804 but having equivalent circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness, is not excluded by the hears a y r u l e , i f t h e c o u r t d e t e r m i n e s t h a t ( A ) t h e statement is offered as evidence of a material fact; (B) the statement is more probative on the point for which it is offered than other evidence which the proponent can procure through reasonable efforts; and (C) the general purposes of these rules and the interests of justice will best be served by admission of the statement into evidence. However, a statement may not be admitted under this exception unless the proponent of it makes known to the adverse party sufficiently in advance of the trial or hearing to provide the adverse party with a fair opportunity to prepare to meet it, the proponent’s intention to offer the statement and the particulars of it, including the name and address of the declarant. SECTION IX AUTHENTICATION AND IDENTIFICATION Rule 901. Requirement of authentication or identification (a) General provision. The requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims. (b) Illustrations. By way of illustration only, and not by way of limitation, the following are examples of authentication or identification conforming with the requirements of this rule: (1) Testimony of witness with knowledge. Testimony that a matter is what it is claimed to be. (2) Nonexpert opinion on handwriting. Nonexpert III-43
- Page 225 and 226: shall take action under subsection
- Page 227 and 228: e submitted by the accused personal
- Page 229 and 230: CHAPTER XIII. SUMMARY COURTS-MARTIA
- Page 231 and 232: substantial irregularity in the cha
- Page 233 and 234: Discussion See Appendix 15 for a sa
- Page 235 and 236: Rule 101. Scope ( a ) A p p l i c a
- Page 237 and 238: Rule 301. Privilege concerning comp
- Page 239 and 240: evidence would have been obtained e
- Page 241 and 242: agent of a military unit or of a pe
- Page 243 and 244: (3) Evidence that was obtained as a
- Page 245 and 246: Rule 312. Body views and intrusions
- Page 247 and 248: the time of the search. Under norma
- Page 249 and 250: ( e ) P o w e r t o s e a r c h . A
- Page 251 and 252: (2) takes place outside the United
- Page 253 and 254: tendency to make the existence of a
- Page 255 and 256: (1) Evidence offered to prove that
- Page 257 and 258: (2) contact between the mouth and t
- Page 259 and 260: Rule 504. Husband-wife privilege (a
- Page 261 and 262: judge to have access to the classif
- Page 263 and 264: any order that the interests of jus
- Page 265 and 266: (A) Finding of identifiable damage.
- Page 267 and 268: sonable period of time disclosure i
- Page 269 and 270: of evidence of a patient’s record
- Page 271 and 272: inadmissible except that a convicti
- Page 273 and 274: Rule 702. Testimony by experts If s
- Page 275: with the provisions of paragraph (6
- Page 279 and 280: and actually recorded or filed in a
- Page 281: i n g s e x c e p t t h o s e i n w
- Page 284 and 285: 1.b.(2)(b)(ii) as a party, where th
- Page 286 and 287: 3.b.(2) robbery, but guilty of wron
- Page 288 and 289: 5.c.(3) agreement must, at least in
- Page 290 and 291: 6.f.(1) or committed, add the follo
- Page 292 and 293: 9.a.(a)(3) (3) without being regula
- Page 294 and 295: 9.c.(2)(c) ous duty or important se
- Page 296 and 297: 10.c.(4)(d) or duty section with th
- Page 298 and 299: 11.c. c. Explanation. (1) Movement.
- Page 300 and 301: 13.c.(1)(b) prevented. The victim i
- Page 302 and 303: 14.c.(2)(b) must be directed specif
- Page 304 and 305: 15.b.(3)(f) or was disrespectful to
- Page 306 and 307: 16.c.(1)(b) tains its character as
- Page 308 and 309: 17.c.(2) even though the duties are
- Page 310 and 311: 18.f.(3) with intent to cause the (
- Page 312 and 313: 19.c.(5)(c) without force or artifi
- Page 314 and 315: 20.e.(3) Dishonorable discharge, fo
- Page 316 and 317: 23.b.(2)(c) (c) That this act occur
- Page 318 and 319: 23.d.(6)(b) (b) Article 80—attemp
- Page 320 and 321: 24.f.(1) of , (to give up to the en
- Page 322 and 323: 27.b.(3)(a) otherwise dealt in or d
- Page 324 and 325: 28.c.(5)(a) i n f o r m a t i o n v
M.R.E. 803(18)<br />
t i o n , s t a t e m e n t s c o n t a i n e d i n p u b l i s h e d t r e a t i s e s ,<br />
periodicals, or pamphlets on a subject of history,<br />
medicine or other science or art, established as a<br />
reliable authority by the testimony or admission of<br />
the witness or by other expert testimony or by judicial<br />
notice. If admitted, the statements may be read<br />
into evidence but may not be received as exhibits.<br />
(19) Reputation concerning personal or family history.<br />
Reputation among members of the person’s<br />
family by blood, adoption, or marriage, or among<br />
the person’s associates, or in the community, concerning<br />
the person’s birth, adoption, marriage, div<br />
o r c e , d e a t h , l e g i t i m a c y , r e l a t i o n s h i p b y b l o o d ,<br />
adoption, or marriage, ancestry, or other similar fact<br />
of the person’s personal or family history.<br />
(20) Reputation concerning boundaries or general<br />
history. Reputation in a community, arising before<br />
the controversy, as to boundaries of or customs affecting<br />
lands in the community, and reputation as to<br />
events of general history important to the community<br />
or State or nation in which located.<br />
(21) Reputation as to character. Reputation of a<br />
person’s character among the person’s associates or<br />
in the community.<br />
(22) Judgment of previous conviction. Evidence of a<br />
final judgment, entered after a trial or upon a plea of<br />
guilty (but not upon a plea of nolo contendere),<br />
adjudging a person guilty of a crime punishable by<br />
death, dishonorable discharge, or imprisonment in<br />
excess of one year, to prove any fact essential to<br />
sustain the judgment, but not including, when offered<br />
by the Government for purposes other than<br />
impeachment, judgments against persons other than<br />
the accused. The pendency of an appeal may be<br />
shown but does not affect admissibility. In determining<br />
whether a crime tried by court-martial was puni<br />
s h a b l e b y d e a t h , d i s h o n o r a b l e d i s c h a r g e , o r<br />
imprisonment in excess of one year, the maximum<br />
punishment prescribed by the President under Article<br />
56 at the time of the conviction applies without<br />
regard to whether the case was tried by general,<br />
special, or summary court-martial.<br />
(23) Judgment as to personal, family or general history,<br />
or boundaries. Judgments as proof of matters<br />
of personal, family, or general history, or boundaries<br />
essential to the judgment, if the same would be<br />
provable by evidence of reputation.<br />
(24) Other exceptions. [Transferred to M.R.E. 807]<br />
III-42<br />
Rule 804. Hearsay exceptions; declarant<br />
unavailable<br />
(a) Definitions of unavailability. “Unavailability as a<br />
witness” includes situations in which the declarant—<br />
(1) is exempted by ruling of the military judge on<br />
the ground of privilege from testifying concerning<br />
the subject matter of the declarant’s statement; or<br />
(2) persists in refusing to testify concerning the<br />
subject matter of the declarant’s statement despite an<br />
order of the military judge to do so; or<br />
(3) testifies to a lack of memory of the subject<br />
matter of the declarant’s statement; or<br />
(4) is unable to be present or to testify at the<br />
hearing because of death or then existing physical or<br />
mental illness or infirmity; or<br />
(5) is absent from the hearing and the proponent<br />
of the declarant’s statement has been unable to procure<br />
the declarant’s attendance (or in the case of a<br />
hearsay exception under subdivision (b)(2), (3), or<br />
( 4 ) , t h e d e c l a r a n t ’ s a t t e n d a n c e o r t e s t i m o n y ) b y<br />
process or other reasonable means; or<br />
(6) is unavailable within the meaning of Article<br />
49(d)(2).<br />
A declarant is not unavailable as a witness if the<br />
d e c l a r a n t ’ s e x e m p t i o n , r e f u s a l , c l a i m o f l a c k o f<br />
memory, inability, or absence is due to the procurem<br />
e n t o r w r o n g d o i n g o f t h e p r o p o n e n t o f t h e<br />
declarant’s statement for the purpose of preventing<br />
the witness from attending or testifying.<br />
(b) Hearsay exceptions. The following are not excluded<br />
by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable<br />
as a witness.<br />
(1) Former testimony. Testimony given as a witness<br />
at another hearing of the same or different<br />
proceeding, or in a deposition taken in compliance<br />
w i t h l a w i n t h e c o u r s e o f t h e s a m e o r a n o t h e r<br />
proceeding, if the party against whom the testimony<br />
is now offered had an opportunity and similar motive<br />
to develop the testimony by direct, cross, or<br />
redirect examination. A record of testimony given<br />
b e f o r e c o u r t s - m a r t i a l , c o u r t s o f i n q u i r y , m i l i t a r y<br />
c o m m i s s i o n s , o t h e r m i l i t a r y t r i b u n a l s , a n d b e f o r e<br />
proceedings pursuant to or equivalent to those required<br />
by Article 32 is admissible under this subdivision<br />
if such a record is a verbatim record. This<br />
paragraph is subject to the limitations set forth in<br />
Articles 49 and 50.<br />
(2) Statement under belief of impending death. In<br />
a prosecution for homicide or for any offense result-