18.08.2013 Views

2008 edition - Fort Sam Houston - U.S. Army

2008 edition - Fort Sam Houston - U.S. Army

2008 edition - Fort Sam Houston - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

R.C.M. 912(f)(1)<br />

( 1 ) G r o u n d s . A m e m b e r s h a l l b e e x c u s e d f o r<br />

cause whenever it appears that the member:<br />

(A) Is not competent to serve as a member under<br />

Article 25(a), (b), or (c);<br />

(B) Has not been properly detailed as a member<br />

of the court-martial;<br />

(C) Is an accuser as to any offense charged;<br />

(D) Will be a witness in the court-martial;<br />

(E) Has acted as counsel for any party as to any<br />

offense charged;<br />

(F) Has been an investigating officer as to any<br />

offense charged;<br />

(G) Has acted in the same case as convening authority<br />

or as the legal officer or staff judge advocate<br />

to the convening authority;<br />

(H) Will act in the same case as reviewing authority<br />

or as the legal officer or staff judge advocate<br />

to the reviewing authority;<br />

(I) Has forwarded charges in the case with a personal<br />

recommendation as to disposition;<br />

(J) Upon a rehearing or new or other trial of the<br />

case, was a member of the court-martial which heard<br />

the case before;<br />

(K) Is junior to the accused in grade or rank,<br />

u n l e s s i t i s e s t a b l i s h e d t h a t t h i s c o u l d n o t b e<br />

avoided;<br />

(L) Is in arrest or confinement;<br />

(M) Has informed or expressed a definite opinion<br />

as to the guilt or innocence of the accused as to any<br />

offense charged;<br />

(N) Should not sit as a member in the interest of<br />

having the court-martial free from substantial doubt<br />

as to legality, fairness, and impartiality.<br />

Discussion<br />

Examples of matters which may be grounds for challenge under<br />

subsection (N) are that the member: has a direct personal interest<br />

in the result of the trial; is closely related to the accused, a<br />

counsel, or a witness in the case; has participated as a member or<br />

counsel in the trial of a closely related case; has a decidedly<br />

friendly or hostile attitude toward a party; or has an inelastic<br />

o p i n i o n c o n c e r n i n g a n a p p r o p r i a t e s e n t e n c e f o r t h e o f f e n s e s<br />

charged.<br />

(2) When made.<br />

( A ) U p o n c o m p l e t i o n o f e x a m i n a t i o n . U p o n<br />

completion of any examination under subsection (d)<br />

of this rule and the presentation of evidence, if any,<br />

II-104<br />

on the matter, each party shall state any challenges<br />

for cause it elects to make.<br />

(B) Other times. A challenge for cause may be<br />

made at any other time during trial when it becomes<br />

apparent that a ground for challenge may exist. Such<br />

examination of the member and presentation of evidence<br />

as may be necessary may be made in order to<br />

resolve the matter.<br />

(3) Procedure. Each party shall be permitted to<br />

make challenges outside the presence of the members.<br />

The party making a challenge shall state the<br />

grounds for it. Ordinarily the trial counsel shall enter<br />

any challenges for cause before the defense counsel.<br />

The military judge shall rule finally on each challenge.<br />

When a challenge for cause is granted, the<br />

member concerned shall be excused. The burden of<br />

establishing that grounds for a challenge exist is<br />

upon the party making the challenge. A member<br />

successfully challenged shall be excused.<br />

(4) Waiver. The grounds for challenge in subsection<br />

(f)(1)(A) of this rule may not be waived except<br />

that membership of enlisted members in the same<br />

unit as the accused may be waived. Membership of<br />

enlisted members in the same unit as the accused<br />

and any other ground for challenge is waived if the<br />

party knew of or could have discovered by the exercise<br />

of diligence the ground for challenge and failed<br />

to raise it in a timely manner. Notwithstanding the<br />

absence of a challenge or waiver of a challenge by<br />

the parties, the military judge may, in the interest of<br />

justice, excuse a member against whom a challenge<br />

for cause would lie. When a challenge for cause has<br />

been denied the successful use of a peremptory challenge<br />

by either party, excusing the challenged member<br />

from further participation in the court-martial,<br />

shall preclude further consideration of the challenge<br />

of that excused member upon later review. Further,<br />

failure by the challenging party to exercise a peremptory<br />

challenge against any member shall constitute<br />

waiver of further consideration of the challenge<br />

upon later review.<br />

Discussion<br />

See also Mil. R. Evid. 606(b) when a member may be a witness.<br />

(g) Peremptory challenges.<br />

( 1 ) P r o c e d u r e . E a c h p a r t y m a y c h a l l e n g e o n e<br />

member peremptorily. Any member so challenged<br />

shall be excused. No party may be required to exer-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!