Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

researchrepository.napier.ac.uk
from researchrepository.napier.ac.uk More from this publisher
18.08.2013 Views

CHAPTER 4 THE EFFECTS OF MACROALGAL COVER ON THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF MACROBENTHIC INVERTEBRATES: AN INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL STUDY Excessive growth of green macroalgae in response to nutrient inputs is a common phenomenon in marine estuaries and sheltered bays. In temperate regions, the growth of mat-forming algae occurs mainly in the spring and is capable of persisting at high maintained densities throughout the summer before disappearing in the late autumn (Hull, 1987). The effects of such growth of macroalgae on the benthic environment have been well documented (Perkins and Abbott, 1972; Fahy et al., 1975; Wharfe, 1977; Nicholls et al., 1981; Soulsby et al., 1982, 1985; Reise, 1983a, 1985; Tubbs and Tubbs, 1983; Thrush, 1986a; Hull, 1987, 1988; Olafsson, 1988; Sundback et al., 1990; Everett, 1991, 1994; Raffaelli et al., 1991; Bonsdorff, 1992; Raffaelli et al., 1999). Generally, macroalgal mats, usually of the genera Enteromorpha, Cladophora, Chaetomorpha or Ulva cause the underlying sediments to become more reducing, often leading to anoxia and the accumulation of toxic hydrogen sulphide (Wharfe, 1977; Reise, 1985). These chemical and physico-chemical changes within the sediments cause a general decline in species richness (Reise, 1985; Raffaelli et al., 1991) and an increase in opportunistic species (Thrush, 1986a) similar to the changes occurring in areas of high organic loading (Pearson and Rosenberg, 1978). The resulting changes in infaunal invertebrates have an indirect effect on the numbers of predators, notably wading birds (Fahy et al., 1975; Nicholls et al., 1981; Soulsby et al., 1982; Tubbs and Tubbs, 1983) and fish (Perkins and Abbott, 1972) that these areas are able to support. The causes of increased growth of macroalgae on the sediment surface of many estuaries and sheltered bays have attracted considerable concern, mainly as a 83

consequence of the detrimental effects of algae on the health, amenity, economy and general ecology of affected areas. However, understanding the causes of macroalgal blooms is complicated as they are the result of the interaction of many factors. An increase in the availability of nutrients such as nitrogen or phosphorus or changes in the hydrography of the area are thought to be the most influential factors (Raffaelli et al., 1999). Even when these suitable conditions are present, macroalgal mat formation on more exposed intertidal sandflats has been shown to be facilitated by the invertebrate species present. Reise (1983a, 1985), for example, has shown that the thalli of green algae can become anchored by the feeding funnels of the lugworm Arenicola marina. Once a feeding funnel is clogged by algae, the lugworm builds a new funnel which again may serve to anchor more algae. He suggested that weed mats would not have been able to become established on the sandflats of the island of Sylt, North Sea, if it were not for the presence of the lugworm. Similarly, the importance of tube-building polychaetes and shell fragments in the establishment of macroalgal mats have been noted by Woodin (1977), Everett (1991) and Schories and Reise (1993). Generalisations concerning the effects of weed mats upon soft-sediment invertebrate assemblages are very difficult and their effects still remain unclear (Everett, 1994). Differences in the nature of the environment, the genera of the algal species, whether the algae is attached or floating and differences in the weed biomass all have different effects upon the fauna (Raffaelli et al., 1999). This makes direct comparisons between studies very difficult. Previous studies investigating the effects of weed mats on the sediments and associated fauna have been either descriptive surveys (e.g., Perkins and Abbott, 1972; Fahy et al., 1975) or controlled, manipulated experiments (e.g., Woodin, 1977; Reise, 1983a; Hull, 1987, 1988; Everett, 1994; Cha, in prep.). Surveys have involved comparing the invertebrate communities of areas where algal mats are present to those where they are absent, usually in another part of the same estuary or sandflat (e.g., Nicholls et al., 1981). However, Lowthian et al. (1985) suggested that the presence of algal mats may be influenced by factors other than nutrient availability and that these factors may affect the infaunal communities independent to the effects of the weed. Consequently, because of their large-scale separation, weed-affected and weed-free areas which have been used in observational 84

CHAPTER 4<br />

THE EFFECTS OF MACROALGAL COVER ON THE SPATIAL<br />

DISTRIBUTION OF MACROBENTHIC INVERTEBRATES: AN<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY<br />

Excessive growth of green macroalgae in response to nutrient inputs is a common<br />

phenomenon in marine estuaries and sheltered bays. In temperate regions, the growth<br />

of mat-forming algae occurs mainly in the spring and is capable of persisting at high<br />

maintained densities throughout the summer before disappearing in the late autumn<br />

(Hull, 1987). The effects of such growth of macroalgae on the benthic environment<br />

have been well documented (Perkins and Abbott, 1972; Fahy et al., 1975; Wharfe,<br />

1977; Nicholls et al., 1981; Soulsby et al., 1982, 1985; Reise, 1983a, 1985; Tubbs and<br />

Tubbs, 1983; Thrush, 1986a; Hull, 1987, 1988; Olafsson, 1988; Sundback et al.,<br />

1990; Everett, 1991, 1994; Raffaelli et al., 1991; Bonsdorff, 1992; Raffaelli et al.,<br />

1999). Generally, macroalgal mats, usually of the genera Enteromorpha, Cladophora,<br />

Chaetomorpha or Ulva cause the underlying sediments to become more reducing,<br />

often leading to anoxia and the accumulation of toxic hydrogen sulphide (Wharfe,<br />

1977; Reise, 1985). These chemical and physico-chemical changes within the<br />

sediments cause a general decline in species richness (Reise, 1985; Raffaelli et al.,<br />

1991) and an increase in opportunistic species (Thrush, 1986a) similar to the changes<br />

occurring in areas of high organic loading (Pearson and Rosenberg, 1978). The<br />

resulting changes in infaunal invertebrates have an indirect effect on the numbers of<br />

predators, notably wading birds (Fahy et al., 1975; Nicholls et al., 1981; Soulsby et<br />

al., 1982; Tubbs and Tubbs, 1983) and fish (Perkins and Abbott, 1972) that these<br />

areas are able to support.<br />

The causes of increased growth of macroalgae on the sediment surface of many<br />

estuaries and sheltered bays have attracted considerable concern, mainly as a<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!