18.08.2013 Views

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

corresponds to 44 setigers using Equation 2. Several individuals with a 5th setiger<br />

width of 0.37mm were randomly selected and their number of segments were found to<br />

be approximately 40. This agrees with the results of Gudmundsson (1985) and<br />

Morgan (1997) who suggested, based on the size which gametes first appear, that P.<br />

elegans become sexually mature when they reach 40 setigers. This agreement<br />

supports the contention that the relatively simple method of sex determination used in<br />

this study is a reliable one.<br />

Figures 3.2(i-ix) displays the P. elegans population size distribution throughout the<br />

sampling period. New recruits (individuals with a 5th setiger width of 0.13-0.17mm)<br />

were present throughout the study period. However, intense recruitment was confined<br />

to two relatively short periods, one during April/May and the second during<br />

November/December. Only two cohorts could be clearly defined at any one time<br />

during the sampling period. This was because newly settled individuals reached the<br />

size of the adult population before the next cohort appeared. In March 1997 (Figure<br />

3.2(i)), when the abundance of P. elegans was relatively low, the population structure<br />

followed an asymmetric distribution, skewed towards adults. In April, the population<br />

structure followed a bell-shaped distribution, although the majority of the individuals<br />

fell into the adult size categories. In May, there was a sudden increase in new recruits<br />

which resulted in a rapid increase in total abundance and a bimodal appearance of the<br />

population size distribution. One month later, in June, the population size structure<br />

was much the same except the modal size class for the smallest individuals had<br />

slightly increased. In July and August (Figures 3.2(v) and (vi) respectively), the<br />

structure of the population was still slightly bimodal and it was still possible to<br />

distinguish the April/May cohort from the parental population. During October, the<br />

April/May cohort became indistinguishable from the parental population. The<br />

population structure was distinctly bimodal in December due to another sudden<br />

increase in new recruits. Since the modal size class of this cohort approximately<br />

corresponded to that of the cohort observed in May (i.e., 0.17mm 5th setiger width)<br />

when sampling was monthly, it is likely that these new recruits had settled no more<br />

than one month before the sampling date for December (sampling at this time was on<br />

alternate months). This caused the marked increase in total abundance between<br />

October and December. In February 1998 (Figure 3.2(ix)), abundance was relatively<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!