18.08.2013 Views

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

exhibited by the tube-building polychaete has an effect upon the spatial pattern of<br />

other species.<br />

Species with similar structure functions (correlograms) do not necessarily occupy the<br />

same spatial locations (Hewitt et al., 1996). For example, while the correlograms of<br />

P. elegans, L. conchilega, B. sarsi and N. hombergii suggested that these species<br />

formed patches of increased densities approximately 1-1.5m2, their density plots<br />

revealed that their patches were not spatially correlated. For P. elegans, this was<br />

examined more formally using correlation analyses which supported the observations<br />

that P. elegans abundances were not correlated with the abundances of L. conchilega<br />

or M. balthica (B. sarsi and N. hombergii were not considered sufficiently abundant<br />

for correlation analyses). This suggests that the spatial patterns of P. elegans on Drum<br />

Sands did not have a large positive effect on those of the other common species.<br />

Pygospio elegans was only positively correlated with one species in this study, M.<br />

balthica (8m and 40m surveys). However, positive association does not necessarily<br />

imply a positive interaction, since negative interactions (e.g., predation) can take place<br />

between species coincident in space, or coincidence may occur due to some common<br />

ecological preference between two species. Controlled manipulative experiments,<br />

together with spatial autocorrelation analysis, are needed to test explicitly for the<br />

presence of an interaction between these two species.<br />

Tube-building polychaetes are capable of affecting species distributions via many<br />

direct and/or indirect interactions, e.g., hydrodynamic effects (Eckman et al., 1981;<br />

Eckman, 1983), provision of refuges (Woodin, 1978, 1981; Lukenbach, 1986) and<br />

increased food availability (Eckman, 1983; Noji, 1994) which suggest that the positive<br />

association between P. elegans and M. balthica in this study may have been non-<br />

coincidental. A change in spatial pattern of M. balthica or reduced survival, growth or<br />

recruitment may, therefore, be expected in the absence of P. elegans. The processes<br />

by which P. elegans affect other fauna are discussed further in Chapter 8 in which the<br />

faunal communities and sediment variables of P. elegans patches are compared with<br />

non-patch sediments using not a non-parametric correlation approach as in this study<br />

but a more suitable, parametric method of statistical analysis, i.e., t-tests.<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!