18.08.2013 Views

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

formed patches less than 1m2 and thus had non-significant correlograms at this scale.<br />

At a larger scale, the 8m survey also revealed patches of different sizes, e.g., less than<br />

8m2 (P. elegans, E. cf flava and G. duebeni) and 8-24m2 (C. capitata, S. martinensis<br />

and L. conchilega). The two bivalve species M. balthica and C. edule had significant<br />

spatial structures at this scale but the sizes of their patches could not be estimated<br />

because of their location at the edge of the survey area. At the largest scale<br />

investigated, 8 of the 11 species with aggregated distributions exhibited significant<br />

spatial patterns. Many of these formed patches between 40-60m2, P. elegans, E. cf<br />

flava, C. edule and M. balthica, for example.<br />

The sediments were also spatially structured within the study area. Again, mapping,<br />

together with spatial autocorrelation analysis revealed that at the smallest scale,<br />

patches of 1.5-2m2 of increased % organic carbon content, % silt/clay and sorting<br />

coefficient were present while patches >3.5m 2 of increased median particle size (Md<br />

4)) were present. These variables formed larger patches in the 8m survey but their<br />

sizes could not be ascertained with any confidence because they were located at the<br />

edge of the survey area. The 40m survey indicated that these sediment variables<br />

formed patches approximately 80-100m 2 across the centre of the survey area.<br />

High-density patches formed by tube-dwelling polychaetes on intertidal sandflats have<br />

been well documented (e.g., Sanders et al., 1962; Daro and Polk, 1973; Dupont, 1975;<br />

Featherstone and Risk, 1977; Noji and Noji, 1991; Morgan, 1997). Patches of spionid<br />

polychaetes vary greatly in size from 0.04-9m2 (Marenzelleria viridis; Zettler and<br />

Bick, 1996) to 150,000m2 (Clymenella torquata; Sanders et al., 1962). However,<br />

comparisons of the spatial patterns identified in this study with those of tube-builders<br />

found at other intertidal sandflats are difficult since most studies have been carried out<br />

in either very different habitats and/or focused on defining smaller-scale patterns. The<br />

few studies explicitly investigating spatial distributions at this scale have found that<br />

soft-bottom macroinvertebrates generally exhibit significant spatial structuring on<br />

intertidal sandflats, forming patches of various sizes. For example, Thrush et al.<br />

(1989) investigated the spatial arrangements of polychaetes and bivalves in the<br />

intertidal sandflats of Manukau Harbour, New Zealand. Of the 36 populations<br />

studied, 30 were found to have significant spatial patterns, as assessed by variance to<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!