Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier
Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier
8m survey - spatial patterns Figures 2.7(i-viii) present the interpolated density maps of the non-randomly distributed species from the 8m survey while Figures 2.8(i-v) display the significant correlograms. The distance classes 1-6 for these correlograms represent inter-sample distances of 0-8m, 8-12m, 12-16m, 16-20m, 20-24m and 24-28m, respectively. The density maps suggest that 2 species appeared to form patches less than 8m 2 (E. cf flava and G. duebeni; both of which produced non-significant correlograms) while the other species either formed patches between 8-24m 2 (C. capitata, S. martinensis and L. conchilega) or patches of various sizes (P. elegans). The correlograms do not appear to support the density plots for all species. For example, while the density plot for L. conchilega (Figure 2.7(iii)) suggests a patch of approximately 20m 2 was present, the correlogram (Figure 2.8(ii)) implies a patch size of only 8-12m2. Areas of increased densities of some species, C. edule and M. balthica for example, were located at the edges of the 56x56m survey area and therefore it is not possible to give an indication of patch sizes from the density plots and one must be cautious when drawing conclusions from their correlograms. Figures 2.7(i-xii) support the results of the correlation analyses (Table 2.5). The non- significant correlations between P. elegans and most of the other species are clearly defended by the maps since high density patches of most species do not seem to have been spatially correlated within the survey area. Furthermore, the significant positive correlation between P. elegans and M. balthica is vindicated by their contour plots, although the locations of moderate M. balthica densities as well as high densities have to be observed to see this. Figures 2.7(ix-xii) suggest that the 4 measured sediment variables were spatially correlated with each other to a certain extent. Increased levels of organic carbon and silt/clay, together with Md 0 and sorting coefficient were mainly found at the top of the 56x56m grid, although high levels of organic carbon content and Md (I) were also found in other small areas. The significant correlograms produced for the distribution of these variables (except % organic content) in Figures 2.8(vi-viii) indicate patch sizes of approximately 20-24m 2. However, since these were located at the edges of 42
the survey area, one must be cautious. The significant positive correlations between P. elegans abundance and the levels % silt/clay, % organics and sorting coefficient are supported by the contour plots. 40m survey - spatial patterns Figures 2.9(i-xi) present the contour maps of the non-randomly distributed species from the 40m survey and Figures 2.10(i-ix) display the significant correlograms. The distance classes 1-6 for these correlograms represent inter-sample distances 0-40m, 40-60m, 60-80m, 80-100m, 100-120m and 120-140m respectively. These Figures suggest that P. elegans, E. cfflava, M. balthica and C. edule formed patches between 40-60m2. Some species, S. martinensis, A. marina, L. conchilega and B. sarsi for example, formed patches which were located at the edge of the survey area and so it is difficult to estimate their patch sizes. Although not formally tested, none of the species appeared to form patches which were spatially correlated with any other species. The significant positive correlation between P. elegans and M. balthica (Table 2.5) is not strongly supported by the contour plots, although their patch sizes were similar they were not spatially correlated. Figure 2.9(xii-xv) show that the sediment variables appear to have had increased levels approximately across the middle region of the survey area. The correlograms indicated that these patches were approximately 80-100m2. The significant positive correlations between P. elegans and % organic carbon, % silt/clay and sorting coefficient (Table 2.5) were better supported by the maps for the 40m survey than they were for the 8m survey with high levels of these variables occurring at approximately the same areas as the P. elegans patches. The contour plots support the significant positive correlations between P. elegans and % silt/clay, % organics and sorting coefficient and suggest that no other species was positively correlated with them. 43
- Page 5 and 6: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to m
- Page 7 and 8: Results. . 65 Size distribution of
- Page 9 and 10: CHAPTER 9. GENERAL DISCUSSION . . 2
- Page 11 and 12: Figure 5.4 Figure 5.5 Figure 6.1 Fi
- Page 13 and 14: LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Statistica
- Page 15 and 16: BACKGROUND CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION A
- Page 17 and 18: The scales of observation, or the s
- Page 19 and 20: systematic sampling design to inves
- Page 21 and 22: aised sediment within an otherwise
- Page 23 and 24: Fauchald and Jumars (1979) describe
- Page 25: Dalmeny House and sewage discharged
- Page 28 and 29: E 7— E 6-ac. MHWS MHWN t co 4 —
- Page 30 and 31: variance (TTLQV) techniques (see Lu
- Page 32 and 33: analysis using Moran's and Geary's
- Page 34 and 35: Holme and McIntyre (1984). Percenta
- Page 36 and 37: Pattern Analysis - Grid Surveys Sur
- Page 38 and 39: 57 64 1=1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0
- Page 40 and 41: Maps produced by kriging and other
- Page 42 and 43: 200 180 1160 140 100 1-3 80 g 60 c.
- Page 44 and 45: 2.5 1.5 0.5 0 3 T (i) % Silt/clay%
- Page 46 and 47: v : m pattern Id pattern Ip pattern
- Page 48 and 49: " v : m pattern Id pattern Ip patte
- Page 50 and 51: The results show that at the smalle
- Page 52 and 53: Nephtys hombergii's spatial distrib
- Page 54 and 55: (vii) G. duebeni (ix) % Organic con
- Page 58 and 59: (1) P. elegans (iii) L. conchilega
- Page 60 and 61: a) Ts 1.4 0.6 u 0.2 -0.2 1.4 'E5 0.
- Page 62 and 63: 200m 150m 100m 50m (ix) C. edule 56
- Page 64 and 65: 73 ‘a• el 1.4 (ix) G. duebeni 1
- Page 66 and 67: DISCUSSION The main aims of this st
- Page 68 and 69: formed patches less than 1m2 and th
- Page 70 and 71: stutchbutyi, at Wirroa island, New
- Page 72 and 73: exhibited by the tube-building poly
- Page 74 and 75: CHAPTER 3 THE POPULATION STRUCTURE
- Page 76 and 77: Asexual reproduction by fragmentati
- Page 78 and 79: METHODS Survey design - It has been
- Page 80 and 81: RESULTS The species abundances in e
- Page 82 and 83: corresponds to 44 setigers using Eq
- Page 84 and 85: 1 0000000 00 rg 0 00 d- - Xauanbau
- Page 86 and 87: Reproductive activity of Pygospio e
- Page 88 and 89: P. elegans larvae at Drum Sands hav
- Page 90 and 91: Pygospio elegans showed great seaso
- Page 92 and 93: Previous studies have produced simi
- Page 94 and 95: The sole reliance on a planktonic m
- Page 96 and 97: abundance are highly seasonal, were
- Page 98 and 99: CHAPTER 4 THE EFFECTS OF MACROALGAL
- Page 100 and 101: studies may have been completely di
- Page 102 and 103: METHODS Study site - The exact posi
- Page 104 and 105: 1 C N W 4----111" 1.5m 2 NW C Contr
8m survey - spatial patterns<br />
Figures 2.7(i-viii) present the interpolated density maps of the non-randomly<br />
distributed species from the 8m survey while Figures 2.8(i-v) display the significant<br />
correlograms. The distance classes 1-6 for these correlograms represent inter-sample<br />
distances of 0-8m, 8-12m, 12-16m, 16-20m, 20-24m and 24-28m, respectively. The<br />
density maps suggest that 2 species appeared to form patches less than 8m 2 (E. cf<br />
flava and G. duebeni; both of which produced non-significant correlograms) while the<br />
other species either formed patches between 8-24m 2 (C. capitata, S. martinensis and<br />
L. conchilega) or patches of various sizes (P. elegans). The correlograms do not<br />
appear to support the density plots for all species. For example, while the density plot<br />
for L. conchilega (Figure 2.7(iii)) suggests a patch of approximately 20m 2 was<br />
present, the correlogram (Figure 2.8(ii)) implies a patch size of only 8-12m2.<br />
Areas of increased densities of some species, C. edule and M. balthica for example,<br />
were located at the edges of the 56x56m survey area and therefore it is not possible to<br />
give an indication of patch sizes from the density plots and one must be cautious when<br />
drawing conclusions from their correlograms.<br />
Figures 2.7(i-xii) support the results of the correlation analyses (Table 2.5). The non-<br />
significant correlations between P. elegans and most of the other species are clearly<br />
defended by the maps since high density patches of most species do not seem to have<br />
been spatially correlated within the survey area. Furthermore, the significant positive<br />
correlation between P. elegans and M. balthica is vindicated by their contour plots,<br />
although the locations of moderate M. balthica densities as well as high densities have<br />
to be observed to see this.<br />
Figures 2.7(ix-xii) suggest that the 4 measured sediment variables were spatially<br />
correlated with each other to a certain extent. Increased levels of organic carbon and<br />
silt/clay, together with Md 0 and sorting coefficient were mainly found at the top of<br />
the 56x56m grid, although high levels of organic carbon content and Md (I) were also<br />
found in other small areas. The significant correlograms produced for the distribution<br />
of these variables (except % organic content) in Figures 2.8(vi-viii) indicate patch<br />
sizes of approximately 20-24m 2. However, since these were located at the edges of<br />
42