18.08.2013 Views

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Nephtys hombergii's spatial distribution produced a significant correlogram (Figure<br />

2.6v) even though its distribution was not significantly different from random (Table<br />

2.2). The correlogram implies that N. hombergii formed patches between 1-1.5m2<br />

which were 1.5-2m apart, this is supported by its density plot, Figure 2.5(viii).<br />

Similarly, Thrush et al. (1989) found that some species which were randomly<br />

distributed according to their indices of dispersion did in fact have significant spatial<br />

structures.<br />

Figures 2.5(ix-xii) display the spatial heterogeneity of % organic carbon, % silt/clay,<br />

Md (1) and sorting coefficient. These sediment variables also appeared clumped:<br />

patches of increased organic carbon and silt/clay contents, together with areas of<br />

higher Md Os and sorting coefficients, were present. These patches appeared larger<br />

than those formed by most of the faunal species analysed. The significant<br />

correlograms presented in Figures 2.6(vi-ix) suggest spatial structures with patch sizes<br />

1.5-2m2 for % organic content, % silt/clay and sorting coefficient and >3.5m 2 for Md<br />

(1). Within these patches, sediments contained higher levels of these variables<br />

compared to surrounding sediments. According to their contour plots, these 4<br />

sediment variables appeared to have been positively correlated with each other in their<br />

spatial distributions. A comparison of the spatial heterogeneity of these sediment<br />

variables with those of the fauna must be made with caution due to the mis-match of<br />

scales (see Methods). Although % organic content, % silt/clay and sorting coefficient<br />

formed patches similar in size (1.5-2m 2) to many of the species the contour plots<br />

suggest that they were not spatially correlated. This was formally tested for P. elegans<br />

(Table 2.5) but the density plots suggest that this appears to have been the case for all<br />

the other species.<br />

Figures 2.5(i-xi) support the results of the correlation analyses. For example, high<br />

density areas, or patches, of P. elegans did not occur in the same areas as those formed<br />

by other species, nor did they appear in the same areas as high levels of the 4 sediment<br />

variables.<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!