18.08.2013 Views

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Spatial autocorrelation analysis assesses whether the abundance of a species from one<br />

sample is significantly dependent on the abundances in neighbouring samples using<br />

Moran's 'V and/or Geary's 'c' coefficients, or the Mantel coefficient for the<br />

multivariate situation (Sokal, 1986; Sokal and Thomson, 1987; Legendre and Fortin,<br />

1989; Wartenberg, 1989). Correlograms, or graphs of these autocorrelation<br />

coefficients for various distance classes, allow inferences to be made on a variety of<br />

spatial patterns, heterogeneity in abundance, patch size and density gradients (Sokal<br />

and Oden, 1978; Sokal, 1979). Oden and Sokal (1986) and Sokal (1986) suggested<br />

that since correlograms describe the underlying spatial relationships of a pattern rather<br />

than its appearance, they may be closer guides to some of the processes that have<br />

generated these patterns than the patterns themselves. Consequently, spatial<br />

autocorrelation analysis has been widely used in many areas of ecology (Legendre and<br />

Trousellier, 1988; Leduc et al., 1992; Hinch et al., 1993; Diniz-Filho and Bini, 1994;<br />

Burgman and Williams, 1995) as well as in marine benthic studies (Jumars, 1978;<br />

Eckman, 1979; McArdle and Blackwell, 1989; Thrush et al., 1989; Lawrie, 1996;<br />

Hewitt et al., 1997) to describe the spatial pattern exhibited by macrobenthic<br />

populations and to help elucidate the processes producing them. The pattern observed<br />

depends upon the grain, lag and the extent and, therefore, there is a limit to the scales<br />

of patterns detected within any one survey.<br />

Since correlograms may only ambiguously correspond to a single type of spatial<br />

structure (Sokal and Oden, 1978) their interpretation should be complemented by<br />

maps representing the spatial variation of the variable(s) of interest (Legendre, 1993).<br />

The easiest way to obtain a contour map of a single variable is to use inverse-square<br />

distance or other interpolation methods, such as kriging. However, interpretation of<br />

interpolation plots may be subjective: the patterns produced depend to a certain extent<br />

on the interpolation method and the distance classes chosen.<br />

This study involved a detailed investigation into the spatial patterns exhibited by<br />

macrobenthic invertebrate species on an intertidal sandflat using some of the above<br />

described numerical techniques including the variance to mean ratio, Morisita index<br />

and standardised Morisita index, mapping with kriging and spatial autocorrelation<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!