Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

researchrepository.napier.ac.uk
from researchrepository.napier.ac.uk More from this publisher
18.08.2013 Views

5 350 — 300 250 200 — ISO — 100 — 50 — 0 350 — 300 — 250 — 200 — 150 — 100 — 50 — 0 350 — 150 100 — 350 E 300 .E 250 50 lcm 2cm 4cm 300 ---- 250 — 200 — 50 — (i) April 1997 Sediment depth (iii) December 1997 ............... 1 cm 2cm 4cm Sediment depth (iv) August 1998 Patch Non-patch lcm 2cm 4cm Sediment depth (ii) August 1997 Patch Non-patch Patch Non-patch 0 lcm 2cm 4cm Sediment depth Figures 8.13(i-iv) : Mean redox potential results (±S.E.Mean, n.6) for each sampling month showing the results of Two-sample t-tests between patch and non-patch values. ** Denotes a statistical difference between patch and non-patch means at 0.01 level of significance and *** at 0.001. 225

DISCUSSION This study monitored the faunal and sediment conditions of P. elegans patches and non-patch areas between April 1997 and August 1998. This discussion will firstly address the faunal differences observed between the two habitat types, and secondly, the differences observed in their sediment variables. Finally, since the results obtained at the end of this study revealed the demise of the P. elegans patches, this discussion will conclude with the faunal changes occurring within patches and the possible processes causing their decline on Drum Sands. Faunal differences between P. elegans patches and non-patch areas. The results indicated that many species showed significant differences in abundance between these two areas. C. capitata (April 1997), C. edule (April and August 1997, August 1998), M. balthica (December 1997 and August 1998) and C. volutator (April to December 1997) were all significantly more abundant in P. elegans patches compared with non-patch areas while no species were significantly more abundant in non-patch areas. The size distributions of certain species, i.e., P. elegans (April to December 1997) and C. capitata (December 1997), were also significantly different between the two habitat types. Multivariate analysis together with non-parametric ANOSIIVI tests revealed that the community compositions were always significantly different between the two habitat types and this was consistently due to several species such as C. edule, C. cap itata and C. volutator. The significant differences between the fauna of P. elegans patches compared with those of non-patch areas in this study support the results of previous studies. Fager (1964) noted that several species, the isopod Munna ubiquita, the pycnogonid Oropallene heterodentata, the hermit crab Pa gurus sp. and the anemone Zaolitus actius were only found in the stabilised sediments within the dense Owenia fusiformis tube-beds in his study. Similarly, Sanders et al. (1962) found that the small amphipod Listriella clymenella was only found within the tube arrays of the maldanid Clymenella torquata in the intertidal flats of Barnstable Harbor, Massachusetts. Woodin (1981) experimentally demonstrated that increases in the density of Diopatra cuprea tubes resulted in increases in macroinvertebrate species richness and abundances. Within the spionids, Noji (1994) noted that areas with moderate 226

5<br />

350 —<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200 —<br />

ISO —<br />

100 —<br />

50 —<br />

0<br />

350 —<br />

300 —<br />

250 —<br />

200 —<br />

150 —<br />

100 —<br />

50 —<br />

0<br />

350 —<br />

150<br />

100 —<br />

350<br />

E 300<br />

.E<br />

250<br />

50<br />

lcm 2cm 4cm<br />

300<br />

----<br />

250 —<br />

200 —<br />

50 —<br />

(i) April 1997<br />

Sediment depth<br />

(iii) December 1997<br />

...............<br />

1 cm 2cm 4cm<br />

Sediment depth<br />

(iv) August 1998<br />

Patch<br />

Non-patch<br />

lcm 2cm 4cm<br />

Sediment depth<br />

(ii) August 1997<br />

Patch<br />

Non-patch<br />

Patch<br />

Non-patch<br />

0<br />

lcm 2cm 4cm<br />

Sediment depth<br />

Figures 8.13(i-iv) : Mean redox potential results (±S.E.Mean, n.6) for each sampling<br />

month showing the results of Two-sample t-tests between patch and non-patch values.<br />

** Denotes a statistical difference between patch and non-patch means at 0.01 level of<br />

significance and *** at 0.001.<br />

225

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!