18.08.2013 Views

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Transect survey - Micro-scale patterns of P. elegans - Table 7.1 presents the results<br />

of the indices of dispersion of adult P. elegans densities from March 1997 to February<br />

1998. An overall non-random distribution here is one in which at least 2 indices of<br />

dispersion indicated a significant departure from random. The results suggest that<br />

adult P. elegans exhibited an aggregated distribution all through the year, except<br />

during October 1997. The greatest amount of clumping was generally observed<br />

during the summer months of June and July (highest v:m ratios). There was some<br />

variability between patches - for 4 months (April, May and December 1997 and<br />

February 1998) adult P. elegans were randomly distributed in one patch replicate<br />

while aggregated in the other 2 replicates. There was a good agreement between the 3<br />

dispersion indices, only during May (replicates 2 and 3) and August (replicate 2) were<br />

there discrepancies between the results obtained from the variance : mean ratio, Id and<br />

Ip.<br />

Figures 7.4(i-xxvii) present the density plots of P. elegans adults throughout the<br />

sampling period. The plots of P. elegans with random distributions, i.e., April 1997<br />

(replicate 1); October 1997 (replicates 1, 2 and 3); December 1997 (replicate 3); and<br />

February 1998 (replicate 3), are included for comparison with plots of non-randomly<br />

distributed P. elegans. Generally, the plots do not differentiate between random and<br />

non-random distributions very clearly. However, it was pointed out in Chapter 2 that<br />

a random distribution (according to indices of dispersion) could still have a significant<br />

underlying spatial structure (e.g., N. hombergii, 1 m survey), especially for low-density<br />

species. The plots show that for those transects in which P. elegans had statistically<br />

significant aggregated distributions, patches of P. elegans were generally smaller than<br />

3cm across, i.e., less than the size of the sampling unit, for most months. However,<br />

since the pilot survey suggested that patches formed tended not to be symmetrical (see<br />

Figure 7.2) it is possible that these micro-scale patches were larger than revealed by<br />

the transects as some of them may have been perpendicular to the direction of the<br />

tran sect.<br />

The significant correlograms produced by spatial autocorrelation analysis are<br />

presented in Figures 7.5(i-viii). The majority of transects with aggregated<br />

distributions of adult P. elegans produced non-significant spatial autocorrelation<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!